User talk:Leandrokillers

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Leandrokillers, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 23:51, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from 2011 Stock Car Brasil season. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cs-wolves (talk) 20:48, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If I could furtherr suggest you use the Show preview buyyon occasionally instead of Save page for each minor edit, then that would be good too. Thank you. --Falcadore (talk) 01:53, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Context and Inadequate lead mark-up tags

Could I ask that you please read Wikipedia:Writing better articles#Lead section before removing any Inadequate lead mark up templates. One or two senetneces is not long enough. The lead section should convey enough information that a reader can understand the article without needing to click on any links. Adding wikileaks to other wikipedia articles and references to external sources does not allow you to get away from writing only a two sentence introduction. Writw it in a way so a reader can understand the article without having to click on anyway wikileaks or references. Two sentences is far too short. --Falcadore (talk) 02:16, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:F1 driver results legend 2

Unless you plan on modifying several thousand driver articles entirely by yourself, this sort of modification should not be attempted. You should bear in mind that this key my already be widely in use. If you are attempting to modify something for your own purposes and your own series of articles, perhaps a new template should be started rather than modify an existing one? --Falcadore (talk) 02:44, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stop vandalising this template. --Falcadore (talk) 02:50, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011 Formula Future Fiat season

Might it be possible to have some feedback with regards to: Talk:2011 Formula Future Fiat season? Thank you. --Falcadore (talk) 02:48, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 2010 GT Brasil season, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 22:55, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011 Formula Three Sudamericana season

If it is wrong or bad then try Articles for deletion. Don't make edits particularly blanking edits without making any edit summaries. --Falcadore (talk) 02:58, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I invote you to explain here where this sort of discussion is supposed to take place. Please operate with, no against. --Falcadore (talk) 03:36, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to help you fix it, but when you refuse to talk to anyone, and delete large sections of the article it looks to many like you are vandalising it. If I may make a suggestion, make all of your change here on this test page I set up for you. Fix all of it - then move the contents to the Wikiepdia article when its finished. --Falcadore (talk) 01:27, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2011 Formula Three Sudamericana season, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --Davejohnsan (talk) 03:39, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at 2011 Formula Three Sudamericana season, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Davejohnsan (talk) 01:29, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Go easy here please. This user is making a genuine effort to clean this article up after s IP user filled that article with some WP:OR attempt at results. This user just isn't good at communicating. I suspected a Portuguese speaker without good conversation English. --Falcadore (talk) 01:36, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user has had over five months to explain his intentions, and has not once done so. Even if he does have the intention to improve the pages from which he keeps removing large portions of contents, he's doing it the wrong way. Even an explanation in Portuguese is better than total silence. --Davejohnsan (talk) 02:03, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but at this point I feel the need to report this user to the administrators. It's extremely difficult to understand the intentions of this user when he does not communicate on any talk pages nor does he ever provide an explanation via edit summaries. --Davejohnsan (talk) 19:37, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 Hours for Repeated unexplained removal of content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here Your reason here The template of Stock Car Light / Copa Vicar / Copa Chevrolet Montana is wrong, I would delete and create another, Please do not block}}

, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:43, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Formula Future Fiat, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Davejohnsan (talk) 22:08, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Are you planning at all to explain why you keep arbitrarily removing content from pages? --Davejohnsan (talk) 22:10, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing, particularly repeated unexplained removal of content, with no response whatsoever to messages about this. If you continue like this there is a likelihood that you will be blocked for much longer, so I urge you, when the block expires, to explain any removals you make. If you do have good reasons then let us know what they are, so we can accept them. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:37, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Leandrokillers (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The template of Stock Car Light / Copa Vicar / Copa Chevrolet Montana is wrong, I would delete and create another, Please do not block. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leandrokillers (talk • contribs) 01:26, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Nick-D (talk) 09:28, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

When this block expires, I would recommend you discuss any major editing at the appropriate talk page - or (since all your edit are motorsport) at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Motorsport. There are a very large band of motorsport editors on en-Wiki, and undiscussed major changes are likely to be very quickly reverted. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 01:54, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. There is no Template:Stock Car Light / Copa Vicar / Copa Chevrolet Montana. There was a Template:Stock Car Light / Copa Vicar / Copa Chevrolet Montana years which you created and then blanked - then it was therefore tagged as WP:CSD#G7 and deleted. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 02:05, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The template you refer to is irrelevant, as your block has nothing to do with that template. It was due to edits such as this recent one (which followed an earlier block for edits such as this one), together with a complete failure ever to give any explanation of what you were doing, either in edit summaries, on the talk pages of the relevant articles,or on this page when other editors posted messages to you. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:00, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Leandrokillers for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. --Davejohnsan (talk) 22:21, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry.

January 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Formula Future Fiat, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Please provide an explanation when you remove a significant portion of a section. If you cannot provide it via edit summary, then please write "See talk page" and provide the explanation there. Without one, it is almost impossible to give you the benefit of the doubt. Davejohnsan (talk) 19:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here (English) Another trouble I have caused: Lsfmuse was my first account, I lost the password, and recovered one month ago, I thought I'd have no problem using two accounts, sorry (Portuguese) Outro problema que eu causei: Lsfmu foi minha primeira conta, acabei perdendo a senha, e a um mes atras recuperei, achei que nao teria problema usar duas contas, desculpa}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Slon02 (talk) 01:50, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Leandrokillers (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

(English) I am Brazilian and I can not speak English very well, but always helped with Motorsports-related pages on Wikipedia, it was not my intention to vandalize pages, Sorry. (Portuguese) Eu sou brasileiro e não consigo falar Inglês muito bem, mas sempre ajudo com páginas relacionadas á Motorsports na Wikipedia, não era minha intenção vandalizar as páginas, Desculpa.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Leandrokillers (talk • contribs) 02:06, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Whatever you intended to do, you have edited disruptively. You have persistently removed content from articles because you personally didn't want it there, irrespective of the opinions of others, you have attempted to take ownership of at least one article, being unwilling to accept that other editors have as much right to edit it as you; you have used more than one account in the course of this disruptive editing, together with editing anonymously from numerous IP addresses. Nowhere have you given any explanation as to why you have used multiple accounts. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:27, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This does not appear to address the reason for the block: it appears that you have been using more than one account on Wikipedia to edit articles. Could you explain? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:14, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Formula Future Fiat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Autódromo Internacional Ayrton Senna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Leandrokillers (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Lsfmuse was my first account, I lost the password, and recovered one month ago, I thought I'd have no problem using two accounts, please delete lsfmuse account (Portuguese) Outro problema que eu causei: Lsfmu foi minha primeira conta, acabei perdendo a senha, e a um mes atras recuperei, achei que nao teria problema usar duas contas, por favor deleta minha conta lsfmuse

Decline reason:

You have still failed to address the reason you are blocked. It is not merely that you have used two accounts, it is that you have done so abusively. Danger ^{High voltage!} 19:15, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Leandrokillers for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Davejohnsan (talk) 01:51, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]