User talk:Leahmurry

Welcome!

Hello, Leahmurry, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 02:22, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Leahmurry, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Leahmurry! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Burning Down the House, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 01:52, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Burning Down the House, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:06, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of We All Stand

The article We All Stand has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to pass WP:NSONG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 22:59, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Violator (album), you may be blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 01:10, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Leahmurry. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 05:52, 2 May 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

December 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Speak & Spell (album), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Rob van vee 15:12, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Age of Consent (song) has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 21:42, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Age of Consent (song). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Age of Consent (song) was changed by Leahmurry (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957217 on 2016-06-11T21:52:12+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:52, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 22:47, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]