User talk:Kokuna

United World Chart (www.mediatraffic.de) =

Please do not add information from the United World Chart, or any other chart listed at WP:BADCHARTS, to any Wikipedia articles. Thank you.—Kww(talk) 16:25, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 2009 in music. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. You must stop adding information from charts listed at WP:BADCHARTS—Kww(talk) 16:38, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2009 in music, you will be blocked from editing. —Kww(talk) 17:28, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2009 in music. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. —Kww(talk) 17:31, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

United World Chart

I don't respond to e-mails because I don't like to give out my e-mail address. Also, I didn't even realize you had sent me messages ... when I'm on Wikipedia, I usually respond to e-mail slowly. If you would like to leave me a message, please use my talk page (click here). It's prohibited because it isn't a legitimate chart. It's a hobby chart made by amateurs. It's been discussed here and on German Wikipedia, and both of us have decided that it cannot be used.—Kww(talk) 20:30, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

United World Chart

You have been warned several times. Please stop adding material to Wikipedia based on the United World Chart. It's listed at WP:BADCHARTS, and all material derived from it will be deleted. Repeatedly adding information based on it is a form of disruptive editing, and will eventually result in your account being blocked.—Kww(talk) 12:40, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Best selling music in 2009. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. You must stop adding material to Wikipedia based on the United World Chart—Kww(talk) 16:26, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not the only decision maker

I am not the only decision maker. WP:BADCHARTS is a guideline generated by the community as to what charts cannot be included. The United World Chart is on that guideline. The people expressing their opinion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best selling albums in 2009‎ are editors from all over Wikipedia, the vast majority of which are saying that the article must be deleted. Creating an exact copy of the article so that you can try to evade the deletion discussion is clearly disruptive editing. You must stop creating articles or adding information based on the United World Chart. If you do so again, you will be blocked from editing.—Kww(talk) 16:46, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's what Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best selling albums in 2009‎ is: an open discussion where any Wikipedia editor that is interested can express an opinion. At this time, you are the only editor that has asked for the article to be kept. All others have said it should be deleted.—Kww(talk) 17:01, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The reasonable argument against the article was written down many times. I'll write it again, simply. The Wikipedia community has decided that the United World Chart is a bad chart. That was recorded at WP:BADCHARTS. Since your article is based on the United World Chart, it must be deleted.

What chart do you think is an official chart for Brazil? Hopefully not the Brazil Hot 100, which is another chart listed at WP:BADCHARTS.—Kww(talk) 17:26, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

You are being discussed at the administrator's noticeboard.—Kww(talk) 18:43, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No reason to stop contributing

There's no reason for you to stop contributing. You just need to understand that we have guidelines about content, and guidelines about behaviour. There must be something you are interested in besides the United World Chart. You did a good job on the table, and the article looked nice ...it's just that mediatraffic.de wasn't a good thing to take stuff from. There's always a lot of work to do on music articles, and lots of chart positions to fill in and to verify. User:Kww/goodcharts contains a list of charts that are known to be good.—Kww(talk) 20:37, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 08:53, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

I started the deletion process when I opened the AFD. That will last for five days. When it is over, an admin will look at what people said. He will delete the article then. Neither of us can delete an article by ourselves.—Kww(talk) 12:13, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]