User talk:JonC0001

Feel free to leave comments here if you are responding to a comment I left somewhere else at wikipedia. NewYorkeruser (talk) 15:22, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please view the mistakes section of my page. Feel free to make the edits to the pages listed. After you make the edits to the pages listed, please edit this talk page to tell me what was done. NewYorkeruser (talk) 19:46, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Total Area includes water

Hello, I responded to your comment at Talk:Brookhaven,_New_York#Check_your_facts. --Neighborhoodpalmreader (talk) 03:44, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

West Elmira, New York

Thanks for catching this page; I had no idea that it was missing from the county template. Nyttend (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zip codes

You asked: "What is the purpose in listing only eleven California zip codes" and "What is the purpose in listing only nine New York zip codes".

Those happen to be the only ones that we have articles on... so far. (Unless there are ones that exist but don't have category tags yet.)

Just a fluke, is all. DS (talk) 21:58, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adams-Ryan House

Well, I just noticed that you left a question at the article two years ago, but better later than never, eh? So now I know how to find town boundaries in New York State using the USGS National Map Viewer. Thanks for making me think -:) --Arg342 (talk) 10:14, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New York Adirondack Park map

Please stop replacing the "New York Adirondack Park" map with the plain New York state version in locales within and near the park! On your user page you write "Some [pages] have a map of New York's Adirondack Park instead of a map of New York." This is wrong: the "New York Adirondack Park" map is a map of New York State, but with the addition of the Adirondack Park (granted, it's badly named). For towns within and near the six million-acre park, its presence is hugely significant. Thanks, -- Mwanner | Talk 00:47, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New York Adirondack Park map

Sorry, I didn't notice the county lines. You're right, they're important too. Yes, we could use both maps, but the ideal would be to have a map with the county lines and the Adirondack Park, for use on North Country pages. I'll see if I can get it made. -- Mwanner | Talk 14:29, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And while we're at it, it would be good to keep the rivers! -- Mwanner | Talk 14:32, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I made Template:Geobox locator New York Adirondack which works with the Geobox family of infoboxes. I tried to make a pushpin map template similar to Template:Location map USA New York Adirondack Park but could not get it to work in preview mode. I have now spent a lot more time than I really have on this. Sorry, but you'll have to find someone else to make the template. I also restored the map on Mwanner's talk page (which you could have also done). Take care, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 04:33, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Eagle Lake, Texas

Erroneous deletion. Suppose I got ahead of myself. Thank you for your work on the list. Löthar the Tërrible 04:02, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Newark, NY

You edited the infobox on this article, and it moved the pushpin to a location that is clearly not correct. Newark is in Wayne County. You're about a hundred miles (if not more) off. I have no idea how to edit things like this, but it's a pretty glaring error. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.138.177.239 (talk) 11:26, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits on Texas "vanished communities"

Ghost towns have remains, and even some people who still live there. Pedernales, Texas and Bettina, Texas left behind no remains. Poof! Gone. And they were both early settlements during the 19th Century migration of Germans to Texas - please do not edit out that fact. Zodiac, Texas is also a vanished community, as opposed to a ghost town. There are no remains of Zodiac, and it is not unnecessary text to mention the three Mormon communities founded by Lyman Wight. Who settled these communities, how and why is what makes them notable enough to have an article. I know your intents were in Good Faith, but you got those wrong. In reverting out what you saw as "unnecessary text", you changed the historical content. Please leave them as is. Thank you. — Maile (talk) 18:04, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, JonC0001. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, JonC0001. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Template for counties of Texas

It turns out that the exact alignment of those labels depends on the browser and what CSS line-height values they use by default. What looks fine in one browser may not look right in another. -- Denelson 83 23:30, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I just looked at it in Google Chrome, and it looks like every single one of these labels is offset upward, so I will need to adjust them. -- Denelson 83 04:16, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And those adjustments have now been made. Does that look any better to you? -- Denelson 83 04:33, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Nice map! Nadalex (talk) 10:12, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]