User talk:Jaiquiero

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome Jaiquiero!

Hello Jaiquiero. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Ad Orientem, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:   Introduction to Wikipedia   The five pillars of Wikipedia   Editing tutorial   How to edit a page   Simplified Manual of Style   The basics of Wikicode   How to develop an article   How to create an article   Help pages   What Wikipedia is not

Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:   Do be bold   Do assume good faith   Do be civil   Do keep cool!   Do maintain a neutral point of view   Don't spam   Don't infringe copyright   Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest   Don't commit vandalism   Don't get blocked

If you need further help, you can:   Ask a question

or you can:   Get help at the Teahouse

or even:   Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{Help me}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:   Fight vandalism   Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome   Help contribute to articles   Perform maintenance tasks

Become a member of a project that interests you   Help design new templates   Subscribe and contribute to The Signpost   Translate articles from Wikipedias in other languages

To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

Please remember to:

• Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
• Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
  

The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

• Español
• Deutsch
• Français
• Italiano
• עברית
• Русский
• 日本語
• Polski
• فارسی

Sincerely, Ad Orientem (talk) (Leave me a message) 01:13, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Ad Orientem (talk) 01:13, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of White Star Line ships, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Admiralty. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Gauge (actress)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Gauge (actress), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:32, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

Hello, I'm Grumpylawnchair. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Blue Crush, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Grumpylawnchair (talk) 17:55, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Woodlouse, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Blogs are generally not reliable unless the writer can be proved to be a "subject-matter expert". Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 12:44, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Football hooliganism, you may be blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 07:19, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Please stop creating categories. Not only are most of them empty, they are simply incorrect. Meters (talk) 07:43, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Again, stop with the over-categorization. We do not need to include articles in parent categories when they are already included in sub-categories, as you did at Elise Finch. And don't create single-entry categories such as Category:Television anchors from Mount Vernon and Category:Journalists from Mount Vernon, New York‎.. Meters (talk) 05:10, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kate Todd. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 01:09, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

What part of my request that you stop overcategorizing do you not understand? Sarah Dugdale was born in 1995 and per your own own material did not start acting until a series that started in 2010. Thus she was not active as an actress in the 20th century and should not be included in Category:20th-century American actresses or Category:20th-century Canadian actresses. There's nothing in the article saying she is American so she should also not be included in Category:21st-century American actresses or Category:American film actresses or Category:American people of British descent or Category:American people of Canadian descent or Category:American television actresses or Category:Canadian expatriate actresses in the United States, and there's nothing in the article showing she is of British descent so she should not be in Category:Canadian people of British descent. You are making unsourced, and sometimes incorrect, claims about the person by adding these categories. Meters (talk) 01:41, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Boomtown. Meters (talk) 01:48, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Teen Mom 2

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Teen Mom 2, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:55, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on List of American films of 2023

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of American films of 2023, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:54, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of American Fourth of July mass shootings, 2023 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article American Fourth of July mass shootings, 2023 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Fourth of July mass shootings, 2023 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 13:43, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Dawson City

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Dawson City, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:50, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Dawson City

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Dawson City, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL" error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:50, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Downtown Hotel

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Downtown Hotel, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:50, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Last Sentinel moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Last Sentinel. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:17, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2023 science fiction ocean films

A tag has been placed on Category:2023 science fiction ocean films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:18, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Night Heat article edit

Hi Jaiquiero. Regarding your choice to pipe the phrase "unnamed northeastern North American metropolis" to the article for Great Lakes megalopolis: Do you have a reference that can be cited to support that the city was identified as being around the Great Lakes? Marchije•^speak/_peek 00:20, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Celeste Desjardins for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Celeste Desjardins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celeste Desjardins until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 20:19, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:French-language Actresses from Northwest Terroritories

A tag has been placed on Category:French-language Actresses from Northwest Terroritories indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:15, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:French-language Actresses from Nunavut

A tag has been placed on Category:French-language Actresses from Nunavut indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:16, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:French-language Actresses from Ontario

A tag has been placed on Category:French-language Actresses from Ontario indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:21, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:French-language Actresses from Quebec

A tag has been placed on Category:French-language Actresses from Quebec indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:21, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:French-language Actresses from New Brunswick

A tag has been placed on Category:French-language Actresses from New Brunswick indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:21, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:French-language Actresses from Nova Scotia

A tag has been placed on Category:French-language Actresses from Nova Scotia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:22, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:French-language Actresses from Prince Edward Island

A tag has been placed on Category:French-language Actresses from Prince Edward Island indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:22, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:French-language Actresses from Newfoundland and Labrador

A tag has been placed on Category:French-language Actresses from Newfoundland and Labrador indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:22, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:French-language Actresses from Manitoba

A tag has been placed on Category:French-language Actresses from Manitoba indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:22, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:French-language Actresses from Alberta

A tag has been placed on Category:French-language Actresses from Alberta indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:22, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:French-language Actresses from British Columbia

A tag has been placed on Category:French-language Actresses from British Columbia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:22, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:French-language Actresses from Yukon

A tag has been placed on Category:French-language Actresses from Yukon indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:23, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:French-language Canadian actresses by province or territory

A tag has been placed on Category:French-language Canadian actresses by province or territory indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:52, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1970s rape films

A tag has been placed on Category:1970s rape films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:25, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2023 rape thriller films

A tag has been placed on Category:2023 rape thriller films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:26, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2020s rape thriller films

A tag has been placed on Category:2020s rape thriller films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:27, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2020s rape films

A tag has been placed on Category:2020s rape films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:27, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Film genres

Hello, Jaiquiero,

There is no film genre called "rape film" or "rape thriller film" and it's disturbing that you came up with this on your own. I encourage you to revert your edits before they are reverted by other editors. Please do not create unnecessary, invalid categories that will just need to be deleted. You care creating so many categories, if this disruption continues, you might receive a partial block from editing categories. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:36, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Murder of Patricia Lonergan

Hello! Your submission of Murder of Patricia Lonergan at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Edwardx (talk) 11:58, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Category:French-language British actresses has been nominated for deletion

Category:French-language British actresses has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 12:28, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Category:American Fourth of July mass shootings, 2023 has been nominated for merging

Category:American Fourth of July mass shootings, 2023 has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 12:34, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Category:Screen Media has been nominated for deletion

Category:Screen Media has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 12:55, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Excessive citations on Elise Finch

Hi. Eighteen citations covering her death is not needed and falls under WP:REFBOMB, so a majority of them have been removed, plus one is deprecated (Daily Mail). Thanks. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 04:12, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Screen Media films

Mainspace lists are not considered redundant to categories, no. They organize the information in different ways: a mainspace list can be arranged as a sortable table so that people can view it chronologically instead of alphabetically, while a category cannot; and a mainspace list can cite references to support inclusion in the list, while a category cannot. So no, a category and a list don't duplicate each other, because they serve different purposes and work differently. Bearcat (talk) 04:28, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Television personalities from Mount Vernon, New York

A tag has been placed on Category:Television personalities from Mount Vernon, New York requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Part fo a spate of over-categorization by a user who does not seem to understand cats. After cleanup contains only one, now empty, subcat. Mount Vernon has a population of less than 6000, so we do not need this level of categorization

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Meters (talk) 05:36, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Television personalities from Westchester County, New York

A tag has been placed on Category:Television personalities from Westchester County, New York requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Part fo a spate of over-categorization by a user who does not seem to understand cats. After cleanup contains only one, now empty, subcat.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Meters (talk) 05:41, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Note

Hello, Jaiquiero,

You have only been editing for two weeks now and you already have more notices on your User talk page than some editors have after two years of editing. I hope you are reviewing what editors are trying to communicate to you and changing your editing behavior accordingly. If your editing decisions don't improve, you face the possibility of losing your editing privileges for disruptive editing. For example, please don't create needless categories that will just be tagged for speedy deletion or CFD deletion discussions. In the past, eitors have been blocked from category space or from the project because of the reckless creation of unnecessary categories, I'm sure you don't want that outcome.

If you have questions about Wikipedia policies, editing on the project or the correct use of categories, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:34, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:American television anchors from New York City

A tag has been placed on Category:American television anchors from New York City indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:38, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Jaiquiero,

We already have Category:Television anchors from New York City that covers this area perfectly fine. Don't create duplicate categories. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:40, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Jaiquiero, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 18:42, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Category:Rape films has been nominated for deletion

Category:Rape films has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:46, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Sarah Dugdale for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sarah Dugdale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Dugdale until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 13:39, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Britney Spears

Hello, Jaiquiero,

How could you possibly think that you could PROD an article on someone as notable as Britney Spears and that it wouldn't be contested? At this point, your behavior is resembling that of a troll. Please edit responsibly or you could lose your editing privileges. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:43, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 04:11, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you're up to with these 3 edits, but if you think it's funny, it isn't, and if your intentions here are sincere, you may need to better familiarize yourself with this community's norms before continuing to edit. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 04:12, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Til Death Do Us Part (2023 film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Til Death Do Us Part (2023 film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BOVINEBOY2008 16:28, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

The Hollow (2015 film) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to The Hollow (2015 film). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:23, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Thats cool

A tag has been placed on Thats cool requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 13:45, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Son of Sam (film) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Son of Sam (film). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and Imdb is not considered a reliable source. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 10:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Laughing Jackalope for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laughing Jackalope is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laughing Jackalope until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 02:03, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Page moves

Hello. I suggest slowing down with the page moves. The new page titles that you're adding are longer than they need to be, and they don't seem to be in use anywhere, or are extremely uncommon. Wikipedia prefers names that are concise and commonly used among reliable sources. You can read more here.

Also, you can copy a blank infobox from Template:Infobox casino, thus avoiding errors like this.  AJFU  (talk) 16:55, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Yes, please stop these page moves. Our article titles are based on common names, we don't try to follow the official names of properties, and casinos often are referred to by multiple slightly different names. A page should only be moved when there's a clearly better title. Toohool (talk) 17:23, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Jaiquiero, you've only been editing here for one month and all I see here are warnings because some actions you have taken are not in line with Wikipedia's policies and practices. If you don't slow down, a less patient administrator will give you a WP:NOTHERE block. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:29, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Jeez, I thought the motto of Wikipedia was "Be Bold". I suppose it doesn't hurt to point out inconsistencies and polish off redundancies. When I was filtering through the links List of casinos in Nevada, I came across links that were outdated or vague or just plain misleading, I thought it didn't hurt to point it out. Jaiquiero (talk) 13:21, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

This is beyond being bold. You have repeatedly been undone, you have repeatedly been warned, and you have been blocked. That's not an impressive record for a one-month user. You might want to read WP:IDHT and WP:CIR. Frankly, you are becoming a time sink. and other editors' patience is not infinite. Meters (talk) 21:33, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

@Jaiquiero: I know you just want to help out, and to make the encyclopedia better. For now, your best option is to make suggestions for titles on each article's talk page, and get input from other editors. They can tell you whether or not the new title is better. BilCat (talk) 21:46, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dog Pound (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manhunt.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Redirect creations

Hello, I noticed you've been creating a lot of redirects for buildings to relevant tallest buildings in X pages. I've also noticed that some of the redirects you're creating are not mentioned at the target. Can you please pay attention to what's mentioned at target, and not create redirects such as The Sharp Centum Park 203 and The Sharp Centum Park 109 that are not mentioned at the target? Hey man im josh (talk) 14:37, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

@Jaiquiero: Following up again to mention the creation of Lanzhou City Square, which is not at all mentioned at List of tallest buildings in China. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:40, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

"AID Sea Colony Tower 101" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect AID Sea Colony Tower 101 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 1 § AID Sea Colony Tower 101 until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:11, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

"Majestower Beomil Tower 104" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Majestower Beomil Tower 104 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 1 § Majestower Beomil Tower 104 until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:11, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

"The Sharp Centum Park 101" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect The Sharp Centum Park 101 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 1 § The Sharp Centum Park 101 until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:11, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

"The Sharp Centum Park 103" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect The Sharp Centum Park 103 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 1 § The Sharp Centum Park 103 until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:11, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

"The Sharp Centum Park 105" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect The Sharp Centum Park 105 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 1 § The Sharp Centum Park 105 until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:11, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

"The Sharp Centum Park 109" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect The Sharp Centum Park 109 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 1 § The Sharp Centum Park 109 until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:11, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

"The Sharp Centum Park 111" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect The Sharp Centum Park 111 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 1 § The Sharp Centum Park 111 until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:12, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

"The Sharp Centum Park 201" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect The Sharp Centum Park 201 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 1 § The Sharp Centum Park 201 until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:12, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

"The Sharp Centum Park 203" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect The Sharp Centum Park 203 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 1 § The Sharp Centum Park 203 until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:12, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

"The Sharp Centum Park 205" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect The Sharp Centum Park 205 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 1 § The Sharp Centum Park 205 until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:12, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

"Sikka Dream Height" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Sikka Dream Height has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 1 § Sikka Dream Height until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:34, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

"Imperial 3" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Imperial 3 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 1 § Imperial 3 until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:36, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

"Dynamix-Balwas Tower (DB Tower)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Dynamix-Balwas Tower (DB Tower) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 1 § Dynamix-Balwas Tower (DB Tower) until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:38, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

"Songdo I-Core City" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Songdo I-Core City has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 1 § Songdo I-Core City until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:43, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

"I-Core City" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect I-Core City has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 1 § I-Core City until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:45, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

"Lanzhou City Square" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Lanzhou City Square has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 1 § Lanzhou City Square until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:34, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023

Hello, I'm Shadow4dark. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:46.8.169.126&diff=prev&oldid=1168411950 Shadow4dark (talk) 16:09, 2 August 2023 (UTC) Hi I responded.Shadow4dark (talk) 20:00, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Shadow4dark. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Do not restore content that a user has removed from their talk page. See WP:OWNTALK Meters (talk) 20:11, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Shadow4dark. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Enough. Meters (talk) 20:13, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of ethnic slurs, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 18:42, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Explanation and request to move on

So, the vandalism you're concerned about was part of a botnet attack. It's being dealt with at the administrator level and higher, and not something you need to worry about; if you see further instances, just press "undo" and move on.

None of that, however, justifies berating a colleague. Shadow4dark has indicated they don't wish to discuss this on their talk page. That is their right (just like you are allowed to remove this section from your own talk page). If I were Shadow4dark, I would not have warned you for incivility directed at an actual Nazi (because fuck Nazis), but what's done is done. Y'all should both move on. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 21:20, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Gareh

Please note that disambiguation pages like Gareh are meant to help readers find specific existing information quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

• Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
• Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
• Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
• Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
• Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
• Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

There's no mention of 'Gareh' in List of ethnic slurs, and I couldn't find its use as an epithet in any article. It doesn't help the reader to send them to a page that will not give them any information.

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 14:12, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:20th-century rape films

A tag has been placed on Category:20th-century rape films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:13, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:21st-century rape films

A tag has been placed on Category:21st-century rape films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:13, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Rape fiction

A tag has been placed on Category:Rape fiction indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:15, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Rape thriller films

A tag has been placed on Category:Rape thriller films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:15, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Fram (talk) 08:32, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 1. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Meters (talk) 17:57, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Little Ukraine (film)

Hello, Jaiquiero

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Edward-Woodrow, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Little Ukraine (film), for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Edward-Woodrow}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 16:58, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Some advice on editing

I see that you have received numerous warnings about various aspects of your editing, including several warnings that you may be blocked from editing, and I also see that you have in fact been blocked once for a short time. There is, I'm afraid, a very serious danger that you may be blocked again, for much longer, or even indefinitely, if you continue in the same way, so I am offering you a few pieces of advice to help you avoid such a block. Firstly, do take notice of the warnings you have received, and try to avoid making again the mistakes which led to those warnings. Secondly, don't expect to be warned about every possible unhelpful kind of editing you may possibly make; once you have accumulated such a list of warnings about so many probelems, it is likely that an administrator will decide you have had enough warnings, and block you for an accumulation of disruptive editing, even if the final edit which triggers the block is not of a kind that you have been warned about. Therefore, think carefully about your editing, and work at avoiding doing anything which might be considered disruptive. In addition, I would like to specifically mention one kind of unhelpful editing of which you have done a prodigious amount, and which you have been warned about, but have continued doing. That is creating totally inappropriate redirects. You have created over 3000 redirects, and to judge from a fairly significant sample of them, virtually all of them are at best pointless, and most of them worse than merely pointless. You have already been warned about creating redirects from subjects which are not mentioned in the target articles, but in many case you have done even worse than that. For example you have very often created a redirect to an article in which the only mention of the subject is a link to the redirect, which means you have created a circular link to itself. If you honestly don't understand that doing such things is unhelpful, then avoid any risk by simply not creating any redirects at all until you have enough experience to know what is suitable and what isn't. Since you have already been warned about this and still continued, if you create any more unhelpful redirects you may well be blocked from editing, without any further warning. To avoid the risk of that happening, please think about what I have said, and take it seriously. JBW (talk) 19:53, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of tallest buildings in Poland

added a link pointing to Liberty Tower

List of tallest buildings in Shanghai

added a link pointing to Future City

List of tallest buildings in Shijiazhuang

added a link pointing to Suning Plaza

WinStar World Casino

added a link pointing to Grand Casino

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2023 disasters in Spain

A tag has been placed on Category:2023 disasters in Spain indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:51, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2023 disasters in Portugal

A tag has been placed on Category:2023 disasters in Portugal indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:51, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Slow down

Maybe slow down with category creation. If a lot of your work is getting speedydeleted, then there's clearly a problem. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 15:16, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Category:Films shot in Brooklyn has been nominated for discussion

Category:Films shot in Brooklyn has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:14, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

"Raping her" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Raping her has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 10 § Raping her until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:36, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because of your persistent unconstructive editing, of various kinds, the main effect of which is to take up time of other editors who could instead have used the time on more constructive work. Warnings and advice have had no effect, nor has a short-term block. The fact that over 90% of the pages you have created have been deleted (with more currently under consideration for deletion) should in itself have been enough to indicate that there is a problem, and that you need to stop and rethink what you are doing, quite apart from all the messages you have received. Among other things, you have continued with creating unsuitable redirects at a very high rate, after the message I gave you above. Most of the redirects are just pointless, but some are outright wrong. For example, you redirected Nicoderma to Nicotine replacement therapy, but Nicoderma is a soil-dwelling fungus, and nothing to do with nicotine replacement therapy. One redirect like that could be put down to "we all make mistakes sometimes", perhaps even ten such mistakes could, but when an editor keeps creating such unsuitable redirects, despite warnings, it begins to look more like incompetence than understandable mistakes; when in addition a huge number of the same editor's edits are at best unhelpful and in many cases harmful, and when that editor fails to make any attempt whatever to change their approach despite numerous messages from numerous different editors expressing concerns, eventually it is time to say "enough is enough".

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  JBW (talk) 14:10, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about The plaza casino&resort

Hello, Jaiquiero

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Edward-Woodrow and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect The plaza casino&resort, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 10 § The plaza casino&resort.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Edward-Woodrow}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Speedy deletion nomination of Plaza casino&resort@lvnv

Hello Jaiquiero,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Plaza casino&resort@lvnv for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want Plaza casino&resort@lvnv to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 14:39, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Plaza casino&resort@las vegas

Hello Jaiquiero,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Plaza casino&resort@las vegas for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want Plaza casino&resort@las vegas to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 14:40, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Las vegas the plaza

Hello Jaiquiero,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Las vegas the plaza for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want Las vegas the plaza to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 14:41, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The plaza las vegas

Hello Jaiquiero,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The plaza las vegas for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want The plaza las vegas to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 14:42, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The plaza@lvnv

Hello Jaiquiero,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The plaza@lvnv for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want The plaza@lvnv to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 14:42, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The plaza@las vegas

Hello Jaiquiero,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The plaza@las vegas for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want The plaza@las vegas to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 14:42, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The plaza lvnv

A tag has been placed on The plaza lvnv requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 14:43, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Plaza casino&hotel@lv

Hello Jaiquiero,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Plaza casino&hotel@lv for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want Plaza casino&hotel@lv to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 14:44, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The plaza casino lvnv

Hello Jaiquiero,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The plaza casino lvnv for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want The plaza casino lvnv to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 14:47, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Giles cartoon

Hello Jaiquiero,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Giles cartoon for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want Giles cartoon to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 14:48, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The plaza casino resort lvnv

A tag has been placed on The plaza casino resort lvnv requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Plaza casino&hotel

A tag has been placed on Plaza casino&hotel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Plaza casino&resort

A tag has been placed on Plaza casino&resort requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The plaza casino&hotel

A tag has been placed on The plaza casino&hotel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jason and the argos

Hello Jaiquiero,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jason and the argos for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want Jason and the argos to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 14:57, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jaiquiero (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Completely overlooking the other thousands of constructive edits that I have made that countless editors have expanded upon

Decline reason:

They don't outweigh the damage and waste of time caused by the useless redirects. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 17:52, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Just a note - of the 3,871 articles created by this user, 3,610 have had to be deleted. That's making a lot of work for others. Deb (talk) 15:38, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

I started a discussion at WP:VPI regarding what to do with the redirects. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 15:39, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

The editor was warned about being a time sink. This is what can happen. Meters (talk) 19:31, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Why are you so relentless in deleting miniscule redirects? Jaiquiero (talk) 21:10, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Because they a) set a bad precedent, and b) clutter up the search bar. Unlikely search terms also go against WP:RPURPOSE. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 21:17, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Is it me, or am I strongly reminded of Neelixgate? --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 23:14, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

(ec)I have not been dealing extensively with your redirects. I was mostly involved with your mostly less-than-useful category edits. From what I saw, your redirects were of similarly problematic quality so I'm not surprised they are being deleted. Meters (talk) 21:21, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Where can I file a permanent block request for JBW for abusing his admin privileges, seeing how he deleted legitimate articles and other admins?Jaiquiero (talk) 22:51, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

*being meticulously neutral* You can start a case at the WP:CESSPOOL, but it's generally advised to try other means of dispute resolution. Of course, since you're blocked, I don't really know (since you can't edit the Administrator's Noticeboard). Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 22:53, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

*being honest* I'd like to point out that JBW in no way abused his admin privileges. Even if he did, a desysop might be in order, certainly not a block. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 23:00, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Welp, the least dramatic and most constructive step at this point is to use the unblock template to request unblocking and ask that the request be carried to WP:AN for community review. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:13, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

@Tamzin: cause she's been here before to see if she'd like to opine. However, if the community endorses the block, it would result in a WP:community ban.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:26, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

He deleted many articles that ended up being recreated by a third party. Want to explain that? Jaiquiero (talk) 00:20, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Care to cite examples? And who is this third party? Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 01:06, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Maybe this one for starters. Jaiquiero (talk) 01:10, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Hmm... definitely a mistake, and a bit of a biggie at that. If you find more serious examples this could, in my view, be cause for further discussion. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 01:14, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

By the way, by position has moderated somewhat with time. I'm willing to give you a second chance, but with a moratorium on page creation. Prove that you can improve the encyclopedia while avoiding serious conflict for one month and then we can see about creating redirects again. But if you revert back to the patterns that got you blocked in the first place, I'll have no sympathy (Cue dramatic music ) Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 11:26, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Not that big a mistake under the circumstances. And when notified, he took ownership. This is why I no longer mass-delete. The risk of collateral damage is too great. (We all make mistakes; we all must own them. We all should learn from them) But, @Jaiquiero:, JBW's mistake in no way changes the problem cat and redirect creations for which you are rightly blocked. As someone who could actually, potentially unblock you, I think @Edward-Woodrow:'s opinion above has merit. You need to read the WP:GAB. There you will see that pointing out the faults of others is rarely if ever a successful strategy for an unblock request. You need to take ownership of your mistakes, and describe what you will do to not repeat them. Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:03, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Rape films by century

A tag has been placed on Category:Rape films by century indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:45, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fiction about rape

A tag has been placed on Category:Fiction about rape indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:48, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Rape in popular culture

A tag has been placed on Category:Rape in popular culture indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:49, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Rape films by genre

A tag has been placed on Category:Rape films by genre indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:50, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Category:American women fiction writers has been nominated for deletion

Category:American women fiction writers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 12:58, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Folio Prize Award

Hello Jaiquiero,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Folio Prize Award for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want Folio Prize Award to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 14:13, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Plaza casino resort

Hello Jaiquiero,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Plaza casino resort for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want Plaza casino resort to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 14:43, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

2023 Kodak Film Awards moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2023 Kodak Film Awards, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 20:23, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jaiquiero. Thank you for your work on Johnny & Clyde. User:DreamRimmer, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please add some more reviews.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|DreamRimmer}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 15:48, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

"Shawarma poutine" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Shawarma poutine has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 10 § Shawarma poutine until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 18:04, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Last Sentinel

Hello, Jaiquiero. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Last Sentinel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 11 December 2023 (UTC)