User talk:Ibmart

Welcome!

Hello, Ibmart, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Priit Tomson did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Introduction to referencing
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Tacyarg (talk) 21:52, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

What exactly does it mean, can it be removed:

This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification. (October 2009) Ibmart (talk) 09:22, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, that template message means that there is information in the article which is not supported by references. Everything in Wikipedia should be supported by citations to reliable, independent, published sources. Please read the Introduction to Referencing link above for more information. The Teahouse, also linked above, is a good resource if you have additional questions. Thanks, . Tacyarg (talk) 21:46, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hi Ibmart! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Priit Tomson several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Priit Tomson, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 23:28, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]