Jump to content

User talk:HnHCDR

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, HnHCDR, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! - wolf 03:43, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:U.S. Coast Guard History and Heritage Sites. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:30, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the advice, I can work with that. A question though, I found several Wikipedia Sites that I can substitute, one of them has in-line external links too?????
Also after I make the updates then what, is there a resubmit button?
HnHCDR (talk) 22:57, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
It doesn't matter if other articles have the same errors (inline links). That doesn't mean you should create more such errors; it means someone should go through those other articles and correct them as well.
The resubmit button only appears once the draft has been reviewed and declined. So far it hasn't been reviewed yet (I've only commented on it).
Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:22, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks HnHCDR (talk) 00:29, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@DoubleGrazing Would you mind taking another look, I began to make the updates from your comments but did not want to get to far down the wrong path. I fixed the easy ones like external links, etc. I began fixing the inline external links in the tables. Please examine Atlantic>New England, I have updated the first three, 1. Amagansett, 2. Amesbury, and 3. Barnstable. For 1 and 2 I removed the external link but did not convert to a citation because the modern name and the historical names are so similar. For 3. I did convert the external link to a citation to show proof that the Barnstable Custom House is now the Coast Guard Heritage Museum. Thanks again for the assistance. HnHCDR (talk) 01:56, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@DoubleGrazing, thanks for the help, I guess it is waiting time now until someone reviews the draft. HnHCDR (talk) 10:38, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, not much to do but wait. List articles are a bit of a specialty, which I try to steer clear of, that's why I won't be reviewing this myself. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:42, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Cool thanks. HnHCDR (talk) 10:44, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi HnHCDR! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Trying to submit an article for reivew, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

About your editing...

[edit]

Hi, I see you've jumped right into editing, you are trying different ways to contribute, and that's great. You're not going to learn everything about editing here in one day, it takes time, and I'm glad to see your reaching out to venues like the Teahouse for guidance. There are a couple of things, however, that I would like to address with you now.

I've noted that for some reason you have been forcing the Table of Contents to the very top of the article, above everything else. (eg: [1]) I'm not sue why you're doing that but I'm asking you to stop. It's just not done. While it's mostly just weird, in some cases the page looks awful. That's leads me to a question I have: are you checking your changes via WP:PREVIEW, before saving, and again after saving, before leaving the page? Because in some cases the page is in an unsuitable condition. (eg: [2][3]) Taking a quick, but careful look through the page top to bottom can often show when a correction is needed.

Anyway, I don't want to drag this out much more, so I'll ask one more thing; can you stop placing images, enlarged and centered, down below the External links section? (eg: [4]) I have no idea why you're doing that, but again, it's just not done. There is also really no need to upsize images, and try blocking them together mid-page (eg: [5] - which plays havoc with smartphone screens). If you could follow the established usage for images, that would be appreciated. And that's it for now. Just check your edits before saving and them leaving, and keep making use of the Treehouse (and the Help Desk), and you'll get the hang of things soon enough. Have a nice day - wolf 09:02, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. Coast Guard History and Heritage Sites, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 17:15, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]