Jump to content

User talk:Gimubrc

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Gimubrc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Cirt (talk) 17:31, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Gimubrc! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 18:08, Thursday, March 10, 2016 (UTC)

TfD closes

[edit]

Thanks for the help at TfD! If you have any questions, please feel free to ping me here or anywhere else. As one piece of constructive criticism, please use the tfd top/bottom templates when closing discussions rather than the discussion templates you've been using. The tfd-specific top/bottom templates include some extra text directing editors to appropriate places to continue the conversation if they disagree with the outcome. See WP:TFD/AI, where you can find the templates with pre-prepared syntax. When I do closes, I just copy/paste those to the top and bottom and fill in the result. Makes things easy! Thanks again!. ~ RobTalk 18:01, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip; Wikipedia's policies on closure are a little arcane & I wasn't sure which template to use. --Gimubrc (talk) 18:14, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Gimubrc, please read over Wikipedia:Non-admin closure before considering closing any deletion discussion on Wikipedia. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 21:42, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Read and understood. --Gimubrc (talk) 13:05, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection policy RfC

[edit]

You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a discussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ Rob13Talk 16:10, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Grant

[edit]

Would you consider it "bad faith" for someone who is WP:INVOLVED to edit war against a bot, here and here, in order to keep a bitter argument" going? CassiantoTalk 19:52, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The RfC has been officially closed, regardless. Gimubrc (talk) 19:55, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Do this again and I'll drag your backside to ANI myself. CassiantoTalk 20:19, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Amusing, coming from someone who is throwing around threats, and has acted in bad faith throughout this entire ordeal. Gimubrc (talk) 20:26, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Threats? Where? Oh, here? No, no, that was a promise. Please don't confuse the two. CassiantoTalk 21:08, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Gimubrc! You created a thread called Shading in Contributions? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process

[edit]

Hello!

The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.

Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.

The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.

Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RfC on the "Airlines and destinations" tables in airport articles

[edit]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) § RfC on the "Airlines and destinations" tables in airport articles. I saw that you participated in a discussion on a similar topic. Sunnya343 (talk) 18:23, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]