User talk:Ezzex

August 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Sho Kosugi, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Do not revert your edit, it's disruptive. Alternative titles is unnecessary. Stick to the common title Armegon (talk) 20:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sho Kosugi, you may be blocked from editing. Stop edit warring. If you have an issue, take it to the talk page. If you continue reverting your edit, you will be violating WP:EW and you will be blocked Armegon (talk) 01:12, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Linda Evans edit

I have reverted your addition of a date of birth to Linda Evans. In addition to Wikipedia's basic principle of citing sources (Wikipedia:Citing sources), a special need for citations applies with regard to elements of a biography of a living person (WP:BLPPRIVACY). Feel free to add a date of birth when it is accompanied by a citation to a reliable, published source. Eddie Blick (talk) 19:40, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Silent films - running time

Hei hei, Ezzex,

Further to your question on the Help Desk a few days ago: engaged on another task I was reading a book about early German documentary films:

Jung, Uli; Loiperdinger, Martin, eds. (2005). Geschichte des dokumentarischen Films in Deutschland. Band 1: Kaiserreich (1895-1918) (PDF) (in German). Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam. doi:10.25969/mediarep/14035.

and on p. 511 I found what you may be looking for. If you don't read German, here's a translation:

"The projection speed of films was variable until the general introduction of optical sound films from 1929, which required 24 fps for technical reasons. It is now customary to show silent films at the speed at which they were recorded. Up until the late 1910s [i.e. around 1920], film was generally shot at 16 to 18 fps. The operators of the Société Lumière usually shot at 20 fps. Based on the length information in meters recorded in the filmography [immediately below, pp. 511–531], the running times of the films in the 35 mm normal film format can be calculated as follows:

16 fps: m × 0.055
18 fps: m × 0.0483
20 fps: m × 0.0433
24 fps: m × 0.0365
24 fps in 16mm format: m × 0.0916

My maths is very very bad, but:

If you have a 305 meter film running @16 fps, 305 x 0.055 = 16.5 minutes duration
And 305 meters @24 fps = 305 x 0.0365 = 11.13 minutes duration

Since 1 foot = 0.305 metre, a 1000 feet film running @16 fps = 1000 x 0.055 x 0.305 = 16.8 minutes (I think)
And 1000 feet @24fps = 1000 x 0.0365 x 0.305 = 11.13 minutes.

There must be some intermediate calculation involving 60 seconds per minute, but my maths is not that good. I read somewhere that some experienced cameramen continued to film at slower speeds into the 1920s, since it was "in their blood", having hand-cranked thousands of kilometers of film at the same speed. Also, beware, American Biograph and other production firms used 70mm film rather than 35mm to circumvent Edison patents, and I think that this may need even more calculation.

Not sure how any of this works with e.g. Abel Gance's Napoléon (1927 film).

Hope this all makes sense,

PS My favourite beer is Gammel Brygd, I have some old bottle openers from around 2001... ha det, MinorProphet (talk) 17:51, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the answer. That was very interesting and informal.--Ezzex (talk) 18:50, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion contested: Clinton "Clint" Eastwood, Jr.

Hello Ezzex. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Clinton "Clint" Eastwood, Jr., a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Use WP:RFD instead. Thank you. BangJan1999 16:40, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion contested: Clint Eastwood characters

Hello Ezzex. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Clint Eastwood characters, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Use WP:RFD instead. Thank you. BangJan1999 16:40, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Realart Pictures Corporation

Hello Ezzex, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Realart Pictures Corporation, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a valid CSD. Please use WP:RFD to discuss your concern. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 17:00, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Banana Joe (film)

The article Banana Joe (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ezzex,

Don't worry, I've deProded it. That film is obviously and clearly notable. Thanks for creating the page. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 08:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]