User talk:Eowbotm1

Ok...if anyone has anything to say, please be concise, to the point, and avoid ad hominem attacks, or other logical fallacies. Thanks.Eowbotm1 22:24, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Gibberish

Just letting you know that I caught you adding nonsense in this edit of English language. If you want to avoid having this account permanently blocked as well, I suggest you refrain from further acts of vandalism. Thankyou. --Imroy 18:40, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Removing warnings from your own talk page

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from an article. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --ArmadilloFromHellGateBridge 20:59, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Removing warnings from other talk pages

Please do not target one or more user's pages or talk pages for abuse or insults, unwarranted doctoring or blanking. It can be seen as vandalism and may get you blocked from editing Wikipedia. --ArmadilloFromHellGateBridge 20:59, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked as a reincarnation of indefinitely blocked user Eowbotm (talk • contribs • [&user=Eowbotm logs] • block user • [type=block&page=User:Eowbotm block log]). If you wish to appeal this block please do so from your main account. Guy (Help!) 13:28, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eowbotm1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

What the hell? reincarnation of eowbotm? that username was taken when I got here. What exactly have I done to merit a block? And this is my main account. I haven't ever really vandalized. Please explain.

Decline reason:

You haven't "really" vandalized? It's apparent that you're only here to be disruptive. Not only do you share a username prefix, but the same editing patterns. This is enough justification for the blocking of all your accounts on sight. --  Netsnipe   ►  02:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What do you mean, same editing patterns? I looked at eowbotm, and he seems to have been blocked after like 6 pure vandalism. I have only made legit edits (the "really" was because a few of them were biased). And, again, I am not affiliated with him in any way. Perhaps you could look at more "evidence" than a site which says "people may want to review eowbotm1, but the others..." I don't understand why I have been blocked for the actions of someone else who so happens to have a similar username as mine. I don't know where he got it from, but its the name I've used in several of my online usernames: a joke from an online comic I like to read. Perhaps he got it from the same thing. In conclusion, don't punish me for the actions of another.Eowbotm1 02:28, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

You were previously autoblocked for sharing the same IP address as Freemoneyplz (talk • contribs). Considering that both this account and you have tried to vandalise English language by inappropriately inserting "gibberish" here and here you are definitely up to no good. So good bye. --  Netsnipe  ►  06:18, 5 December 2006 (UTC)