User talk:ElloGuvna

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, ElloGuvna, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 05:40, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bishop Canevin

I'm interested to know why you removed the Infobox Christian leader template from the article for Regis Canevin in order to replace it with Infobox Bishopstyles, which has none of the same information. — AJDS ^talk 20:10, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Mike Mansfield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Columbia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

'Ello, ElloGuvna! Your edit to Ben Nelson just showed up on my watchlist; and checking your user contributions, I see that you've recently edited a number of articles on politicians.

Could I strongly but politely suggest that you include an edit summary when you do so? Articles on pols attract a lot of vandalism, editorial comments, and other problem edits; and since vandals tend not to leave edit summaries, the absence of one is a red flag. It doesn't have to be a long justification of your edit; just something to let page-watchers know that they don't have to check the article to make sure that the edit didn't consist of inserting "is a fagget" or "CORPORATE STOOGE!!!" Thanks. Ammodramus (talk) 17:02, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for the expansion of Alan Bible! Lots more detail--it's a much better article now. Meelar (talk) 21:51, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Richard Schweiker, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Medicare and Social Security (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Joseph C. O'Mahoney, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atomic Energy Commission (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Margaret Chase Smith, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medicare (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]