User talk:Ejaz92

Your submission at Articles for creation: Garden reach (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Garden reach and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Revent^talk 18:18, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Ejaz92, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Revent^talk 18:18, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Islamic Modernism

Islamic Modernism is NOT the same as Salafism --BoogaLouie (talk) 00:13, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ejaz, do you think you could defend your position on the talk page here before reverting text? Are you claiming that "Salafi modernism [groups] ... the Muslim Brotherhood and allied groups such as Pakistan's Jamaat-i Islam" (here) are Islamic modernist not revivalist? If so on what grounds? --BoogaLouie (talk) 18:12, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As the problem is related to the naming.Let me clear it:

1).I also have the same opinion that Islamic modernism is not salafism neither I say it is actually salafi movement.As you can see in the article salafi movement, the creators and the editors of the article tried to explain that Mohammad Abduh, Rashid Rida, who are actually the Islamic modernist, were the notable individuals of the salafi movement.But I too along with you contradict with them. What I explain in this edit is:

(a)Some people named the islamic modernism of Mohammad Abduh and Rashid Rida as Salafi Movement...When I wrote " It is also called by some as Salafi movement" : I gave references http://www.oxfordislamicstudies.com/article/opr/t125/e2072

and http://www.jamestown.org/programs/tm/single/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=528&

The last one can be found in the article Salafi Movement too.In google you may find an article of britanica name salafi movement where they talked about the movement of md. abduh and R.rida.

(b)I said the islamic modernism influenced the salafism.It supports your openion.I it is not salafism itself nor it is salafi movement When I wrote " while others say it only influenced the latter" I also added a section in the article named "Influence on Salafism" . I provided its refrences from the site of Dr.Yasir Qadi, a world renowned american scholar who is an ex-salafi and from an article written by Shaykh Nuh keller.

http://muslimmatters.org/2014/04/22/on-salafi-islam-dr-yasir-qadhi/5/

http://www.masud.co.uk/ISLAM/nuh/salafi.htm

(2)On your question,"Are you claiming that "Salafi modernism [groups] ... the Muslim Brotherhood and ...........are Islamic modernist no revivalist, I would say , yes, this name (i.e., Salafi modernism), you may delete. Ejaz92 (talk) 19:12, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is generally agreed that Mohammad Abduh and Rashid Rida can be claimed as pioneers by both the as Salafi Movement and the Islamic modernist movement. But no where among the sources you've given (or anywhere else) can I find anyone saying that the Islamic Modernism and Salafi Modernism are the same. Nowhere can I find anyone saying that Muslim Brotherhood or Jama'at-e Islami are "Islamic Modernist". --23:35, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Ok If its correct that salafi modernism is a term for muslim brotherhood and jamat, then I am going to delete the name salafi modernism from the article.

Now is it ok? --Ejaz92 (talk) 04:51, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I still think you should let a native English speaker/writer go over the righting for grammar, agreement, consistency etc.

For example, It [Islamic modernism] has also been called salafi movement

is not grammatical.

I suggest: It has also been called Salafism by some^[1]^[2] while others say Islamic Modernism only influenced Salafism.^[3] --BoogaLouie (talk) 20:07, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok you can change but what is the restriction in using salafi movement instead of salafism? You may change but use salafi movement.As salafism is not a particular movement rather its a trend or it is a mixture of whabism,salafism and many other movement.But salafi movement was a movement which was inspired by the figures like md.abduh. But in case,if you say it inspired salafi movement it insirectly means it inspired salafism.

Ejaz92 (talk) 04:29, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"what is the restriction in using salafi movement instead of salafism"? It is not grammatical in English. This is an English language encyclopedia.

Do you have any source saying there is a difference between Salafism and salafi movement? In English we consider them the same. --BoogaLouie (talk) 15:15, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

More bad edits

Ejaz why have you deleted the History of Islamic Modernism section?

--BoogaLouie (talk) 20:13, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Revert reasons

I reverted, because the content was improperly sourced to improper sources, overly promotional and failing to adhere to our writing style guidelines. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

You should probably read Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources because what you're trying to use don't fit the definition. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:22, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Garden reach (January 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 14:58, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Garden reach has been accepted

Garden reach, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Onel5969 (talk) 20:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bartala

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Bartala, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Badartala. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:59, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. Ejaz92 (talk) 07:04, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bartala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the Problem. Ejaz92 (talk) 09:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Taratala

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Taratala, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Behala. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:51, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. I have removed the tag from the article. Ejaz92 (talk) 13:11, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Garden reach.png

Thanks for uploading File:Garden reach.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Ejaz92. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions.
Message added 15:45, 3 February 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Vanjagenije (talk) 15:45, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Mufti akmal.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Mufti akmal.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Mufti akmal.jpeg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Mufti akmal.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mufti Muhammad Akmal

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mufti Muhammad Akmal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.muftiakmal.net/mufti-muhammad-akmal. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

The article was a copyright violation. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. The page you copied said © 2015 . All Rights Reserved, so cannot be used. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. But in any case the copyrighted text is far too promotional to be useful for Wikipedia's purposes, so there would not be any point in your jumping through all the hoops that are required.

It was also written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. His own website is not a independent verifiable sources. It is now Wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have independent verifiable references, or they will be deleted.

Not a reason for deletion, but titles and honorifics such as Mufti, Sir, Prince, President, doctor or professor are not used in article titles, just the name, eg Barack Obama, Albert Einstein

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 19:15, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll have another look to see if the tone and referencing are adequate. Bear with me for a couple of days as I'm not available until Thursday Jimfbleak - talk to me? 19:25, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've restored, moved and tidied Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:06, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Manzar-e-Islam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Azam Khan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock my IP & account

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Ejaz92 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

107.167.96.0/19 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · block user · block log)

Block message:

I dont find any reason why I am blocked from editing.I am not using any open proxy.Morever this block was set to be expired by 01:08, 19 July 2015 but it is still blocked

Blocking administrator: JamesBWatson (talk • blocks)

Accept reason: The IP range was blocked because it is assigned to the Opera Mini Proxy, and has been used to evade blocks on accounts. However, I have changed the block to anon-only, so you should be able to edit so long as you are logged into your account. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:37, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ejaz92 (talk) 06:42, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Akhtar Raza Khan has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Akhtar Raza Khan. Thanks! LaMona (talk) 19:13, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Akhtar Raza Khan (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Akhtar Raza Khan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 09:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Akhtar Raza Khan (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

Please do not just resubmit expecting to win a positive review in some sort of lottery. We all check the history. Please do the work. If unwilling to do the work then this will face deletion.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Akhtar Raza Khan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 14:33, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Akhtar Raza Khan (November 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Akhtar Raza Khan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 07:29, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Akhtar Raza Khan (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Akhtar Raza Khan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 08:56, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FreeRangeFrog

I don't understand what you were trying to do at User talk:FreeRangeFrog, but you ended up removing a lot of people's comments (comments where they said they were sorry he was gone). I've reverted your changes. Try again, if you like, but please note that FRF hasn't edited since August, so there's not much point in asking him for help. I suggest you try someone else. Bishonen | talk 09:57, 25 November 2015 (UTC).[reply]

December 2015 (initial)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Akhtar Raza Khan. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Please do not remove AFC decline messages from draft articles. It appears to be an attempt to game the system and is not well received. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:12, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have reinstated those messages. They must not be removed. There is a consensus for their retention. Removal after a warning is vandalism. Fiddle Faddle 22:37, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Akhtar Raza Khan has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Akhtar Raza Khan. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 22:14, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Akhtar Raza Khan (December 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Akhtar Raza Khan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 17:01, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at Draft:Akhtar Raza Khan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Fiddle Faddle 16:33, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As a direct result of your personal attack on LaMona two things have happened. An editor has nominated the draft for deletion, something I think may not happen, and I have removed the draft from those being actively reviewed pending your public apology to LaMona.

You may be upset, but you must be civil. You were entitled to suggest that they may be mistaken, if that is what you mean (whether they are nor are not), but telling the world that they are lying is intolerable. Fiddle Faddle 17:06, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon:,@LaMona:,@Timtrent: Well, I have apologized on the draft comment.I was not meant to insult anyone.I just tried to defend my edits.He was clearly rejecting the truth.My draft has reference for every words.And he gave an example for his support which was not true.I replied eith two visible sopport.And all these happened. By the way, I am really sorry for my use of the word"lying" which I am taking back.......

The draft have been nominated for deletion saying that I am not showing interest in improving it.I am politely requeating you to please see the revision history I added sources on 2nd december then on 25 november.At this time the draft has 14 verifiable sources. Again apologizing for my comment and hoping for the reconciliationEjaz92 (talk) 07:07, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I am sure the others will appreciate the apology. I recognise that English is probably not your first language, and thus your words may have had a stronger meaning than you intended. The deletion motion is very unlikely to succeed, even if it is not withdrawn.

LaMona disagrees with the referencing. I am not going to analyse it in detail, and I am not competent in the topic area. We have editors who are. I suggest you ask at Wikipedia:WikiProject Islam for someone to review the draft. Fiddle Faddle 09:19, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have made a request there on your behalf. Meanwhile please re-read WP:42 and let that be your guiding star. Be ruthless and compare each of your references against it. Fiddle Faddle 09:52, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Faddle.I have read WP:42 and found that my draft is completely in accordance with that.Ejaz92 (talk) 14:05, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the apology? Robert McClenon (talk) 16:18, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Place the apology either in the AFC comments in the draft or on the talk page of LaMona, not just here, and the statement here that you are apologizing is just a marginal apology. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:21, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes.I did the same.i placed it in AFC comments, just below my controversial commentEjaz92 (talk) 16:25, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Akhtar Raza Khan has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Akhtar Raza Khan. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 16:39, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Akhtar Raza Khan

Draft:Akhtar Raza Khan, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Akhtar Raza Khan and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Akhtar Raza Khan during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:39, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation Protection

The title is creation-protected or salted as a result of first a deletion discussion of a previous version of the article that deleted it and then a re-creation of the article with copyright violations. Before asking to have an admin lift the creation protection, it would be helpful to ask the community for help in improving the sourcing of the draft. It would also be useful to apologize to the reviewer whom you insulted. The creation protection only needs to be lifted when the draft is ready for acceptance. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:41, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Akhtar Raza Khan has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Akhtar Raza Khan. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 21:37, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Akhtar Raza Khan has been accepted

Akhtar Raza Khan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 22:45, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I decided it was only right to accept this today, so I have. I take your assurance on referencing on trust. Please may I advise you, now, to be the article's father, not its mother. Allow it to graze its knees rather than wrapping it in soft towels to protect it.

I am sorry you have had a frustrating experience. Fiddle Faddle 22:54, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Faddle: I am very thankful to you for this.I am glad to see it.Now I am going to get it semi-protected to save it from deletion.People edit it with committing copyright violation.Then initiates controversy and finally deletion.Ejaz92 (talk) 12:07, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to request protection. Sufficient people are watching it now to make it fine. Fiddle Faddle 16:46, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Syed Mohammad Izhar Ashraf, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fazil. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Ejaz!

(Charles R. Knight, 1922)

Ejaz, I wish you and those dear to you
golden days of love and joy in a

Happy New Year 2016!

Best regards,
Sam Sailor ^Talk! 01:30, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pass on!

Send this greeting by adding {{subst:User:Sam Sailor/Templates/HappyNewYear}} to user talk pages.

Automatic level-2 heading and auto-signing included.

(Unknown artist, Norway, 1916)

May 2016

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Abhinav Bharat does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Kautilya3 (talk) 13:13, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Kautilya3: thanks for you advice. I am really glad to see that you personally taught me on my talk page. But I think your decision to undo my last edit should be reviewed. It took me 2 hour to search and provide links to the article. I had basically tried to improve the article by providing more sources. Plus I added the founders name.Ejaz92 (talk) 10:32, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sure we can review it. Please open a discussion on the talk page (of the article) and explain what you were trying to do. Without proper edit summaries, we wouldn't know. Also, please don't mix several edits at one go.

I didn't get the ping you gave above. {{ping|...}} only works if it is at the beginning of a post. For more general use, try {{U|...}}. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:24, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Kautilya3: Please brother try to understand.I didn't do anything wrong. You may check it by compring the new edit with the previous one in edit history.Thanks for your advice. I will try to act on your advice. I will insert summery after every edit,in future. THANKS Ejaz92 (talk) 11:06, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I understand what you are trying to do. But this is not the way. You are stating opinions as facts, and replacing high-quality scholarly sources by opinion columns and blogs. Please read WP:RS and WP:NPOV carefully and gain experience with editing according to policy. You really need to open a discussion on the talk page and discuss your edits instead of edit-warring. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:17, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ministry of Labour and Employment. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Your addition to Industrial training institute has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. This is your final warning. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 20:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ejaz92. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ejaz92. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pir Saqib Shaami.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pir Saqib Shaami.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 13:15, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ejaz92. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Mufti akmal madni.jpeg

The file File:Mufti akmal madni.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sunni Community Wikimedia

Hello, I got to know that you are connected to articles related to sufism and Sunnism. Please be a Member of Sunni Community Wikimedia. —|Syed Aala Qadri Kalkatvi (talk) 12:33, 16 June 2023 (UTC)|[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Killing of David Ben Avraham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:02, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://www.oxfordislamicstudies.com/article/opr/t125/e2072

[2] ttps://www.jamestown.org/programs/tm/single/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=528&

[3] ttps://muslimmatters.org/2014/04/22/on-salafi-islam-dr-yasir-qadhi/5/

[1]

[2]

[3]