User talk:EdWood

Firstly, if you know Upchuck personally then any editing you do falls under WP:COI. Secondly, don't add week by week results, he one this match on the 22 June, then 23 June, then 24 June etc., we could be here all year. Thirdly Backyard Wrestling titles don't count, otherwise I am winner of the HHF World Title seventeen times. Fourthly, YOUTUBE and MYSPACE are NOT reliable sources so don't add them. And finally, none of this BS establishes notability any more than this time last week, in fact judging by those youtube clips Chuck is wrestling in front of two men and his dogs, so any claim to "the fastest rising" anything is not justified. Darrenhusted 22:50, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So?

"Ah I see things a little more clearly now " Have you recently purchased some new glasses, or perhaps swapped to contact lenses? Darrenhusted 22:59, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!

Chuck Taylor should not have been recreated without the permission of an admin, at the very least the one who deleted it would have been worth talking to. The second AfD will not overturn the result of the first, in fact the page is likely to be salted afterwards so it will never be re-created. Darrenhusted 23:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The image is not fair use, it is under copyright, and unless Matthewhack and Chuck Taylor are the same person then no permission has been given. The irony is that a bot will mark it and delete it anyway, than the article will be deleted and taken to review where the delete will be endorsed and because of these antic will be protected from recreation. Darrenhusted 23:49, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Angry?

I'm not angry, it's just we already had one fan boy who spent 150 edits defending Chuck, and now we have two fan boys defending Chuck. What did you do wrong? You (or whoever) re-created a deleted article, and now you are wasting editors time with a second AfD when the article is a carbon copy of the first, and the real kicker is that he is just a no mark indy wrestler holding a nothing indy title (whose previous champions are mostly redlinks), an what is really frustrating is that what would be helpful is if those 150 edits could have been done to articles for people who have actually done something, so inbetween rverting vandalism on ten other articles I now have to keep explaining to you why a no name wrestle is a no name wrestler when the burden of proof actually lies with you, and you have done nothing other then breach copyright and post linkspam to the article which shows me that this guy wrestles nobodies in front of crowds you can count on one hand in school gyms. Darrenhusted 00:08, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding youtube and myspace

...and week by results, no wrestling article can contain Youtube, Myspace or week by week results. Darrenhusted 00:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Go for it...

...remove every single myspace and youtube link you see. Saves me having to do it. Darrenhusted 00:22, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...found this:Chuck f'n Taylor The thing gives me a headache, thanks for picking it up for AfD number 2. Darrenhusted 22:17, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

I may re-add the speedy delete tag, I don't think the AfD is needed. Darrenhusted 00:16, 10 July 2007 (UTC) I've messaged two admins, the closing admin last time and and admin who works with the WP:PW and so can bitch slap any indy fans. Darrenhusted 00:23, 10 July 2007 (UTC) Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Wildthing61476"

I'm really not sure what you are driving at, you didn't find anything because it wasn't lost. Trawling my contribs for comments on other userpages will not get Chuck Taylor undeleted. Darrenhusted 12:01, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Under no circumstances will I undelete an article based on the actions of one participant. I base my judgment on the reasoning of arguments presented, not on actions unrelated to the topic at hand. —Kurykh 01:10, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...or related, for the matter, unless it involves disruptive sockpuppetry or the like. —Kurykh 01:14, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then go to WP:DRV. —Kurykh 01:34, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of EdWood

Please stop tagging the category with {{db-attack}}. This is not what the template is intended for and you will find no administrator that will speedy delete the category on this ground. I will file a request for checkuser regarding these accounts and this will probably clear up the matter. If it confirms that these accounts are unrelated, the category will be deleted then. Best, Pascal.Tesson 16:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just re-iterating what Pascal said before, this isn't a CSD candidate, so I went ahead and removed the tag. If you aren't a sockpuppet-master, this is going to be cleared up shortly and the category's going to be removed. Wildthing61476 16:24, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a checkuser request here Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/EdWood. This will probably clear up the matter. Pascal.Tesson 16:40, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop with the tagging of the category. Two editors have explained to you why this is not a proper speedy candidate. If you continue tagging the page I will block your account for a short period and temporarily protect the category. Thanks, Pascal.Tesson 16:46, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]