User talk:Dvin96

July 2023

You appear to have an agenda, which is to attack Ryan Tubridy. I've reverted some of your edits. If that's your only reason for being here, you risk being blocked for WP:NOTHERE and disruptive editing.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:34, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have no agenda. How is this edit attacking? He no longer presents the TV show as of last month. Describing him as a "radio and TV presenter" is accurate and makes more sense.

User:Bbb23 please explain this please. I have given sources for everything. Every sentence. It is possible to improve it of course. But it is international news. It is before government committees.

Tubridy is a small part of it. It focuses on other undisclosed payments. If it was only Tubridy it could be mentioned on his page. But it isn't. It is about wider issues. Your reverting it now makes it look like it is about Tubridy. By putting the focus back onto Tubridy's pay. Which is and was concerning. Because he is only one person in all of this. And that concern I was trying to fix. And to keep all the information in the one place. The title I used is similar to the reliable independent sources. Business Post Irish Independent It takes the focus away from any individual, including Tubridy and all the others involved. Now it is back on Tubridy. That is very serious. --Dvin96 (talk) 00:10, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And how does it "duplicate an existing topic"? It is not entirely about Tubridy. The title shows that. I wrote it myself and didn't copy from an existing topic. A10 says it is for something "that does not expand upon, detail or improve information within any existing article(s) on the subject," I expanded upon, detailed and improved information on this subject. Vastly. Something is not right here. I'd like you to respond to all your edits please. --Dvin96 (talk) 00:26, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not convinced by your comments or your edits that you do not have an agenda. Are you affiliated with RTÉ or one of its related companies? Please read WP:COI. As for the article I deleted, you're welcome to ask for it to be undeleted by posting at WP:DRV. As an aside, given the kinds of edits you are doing, it would be a good idea to use edit summaries explaining your edits, e.g., removing "credits" from a very large number of Irish journalists. That's pretty much all I'm going to say at this point. If you have questions on how to edit here, please ask them at the WP:Teahouse.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:15, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To try to answer this, which is all very confusing and contradicting:

I'm not affiliated with RTÉ or one of its related companies.
I'm not affiliated with any of its presenters.

(By the way, how can I be affiliated with RTÉ, and want to "attack" one of its presenters? That doesn't even make any sense. I think the agenda in that scenario would be to protect them?)

I'm not affiliated with any rival company or person who might want to "attack" a presenter either.
This edit is not an "attack" either.

As for 'removing "credits" from a very large number of Irish journalists'? No idea what you're talking about. This edit removed all of one person's "radio" credits. But I didn't make it. --Dvin96 (talk) 02:41, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you mean the edits on the redirect no one ever says and the redirect I've never heard anyone say either, I did that here coz it makes them easier to read. The newer pages use them and I read at, lemme see it was article titles the ucrn part I think, that it's the done thing round here. I also did it coz I wanted a break from all the unintended attacking someone and thought I'd edit something that wasn't the victim of all the alleged attacks. I defintely didn't touch this guy and he's got the shortened versions of the credits if that's what they are. I don't see anything else about 'removing "credits" from' anyone. Bye now. --Dvin96 (talk) 02:56, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]