User talk:Diwas

Polargeo (talk) has given you a kitten! Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Kittens must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{subst:Kitten}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

Here have a kitten. I get a bit grouchy sometimes. Welcome to Wikipedia. Polargeo (talk) 12:47, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thank you very much ;) I had given you not very exact informations, in my very bad english writing. --Diwas (talk) 12:56, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Czapka revert

No problem. Congratulations on the good work you are doing to help tidy up Wikipedia!buistR 02:15, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Castelnuovo

Ciao! Surely it's 11th century... Shame on me! See you soon and good work. --'''Attilios''' (talk) 08:07, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete the article Elizabeth Willoughby, 3th Baroness Wiiloughby de Broke. It was a mistake.

Peter Lucas

Albert Stroni

Many thanx for finding the error in the article. I saw your questions in the footy project page, so I know exactly what you meant in the edit summary. No, the number (3rd Division) is right. I wrote 3 th because I was writting quickly, and English is not my native language. I usually do them right, but that was an exception :) . Many thanx for having seen it, and I will also take this oportunity just to say "Hi"! FkpCascais (talk) 04:53, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, FkpCascais, thanx for checking. If you are crazy for work, you may look at my contributions to find articles you are interested to check it ;) I found a few wrong numbers like. Some cases I can't guess if it may be correctly 3rd. In this cases I insert a {{clarify}}. English is not my language, too. There are many non nativ english language users writing. --Diwas (talk) 05:16, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Rolling Stones discography

Hi Diwas, I read your note on the talk page, but don't understand what you mean by 1th... is it a certain song with the wrong peak position (Swedish charts)? You can leave me a note on my talk page, if you like. I work on ABBA discography too. Best, --Discographer (talk) 01:58, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, okay... I understand what you mean now! I assume whoever typed in the Swedish music charts information typed the book edition number incorectly. They prabably meant to type 1st edition, I assume. Best, --Discographer (talk) 02:16, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Diwas... just so you know, I "took care of it". Best, --Discographer (talk) 02:48, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx --Diwas (talk) 03:13, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your AWB edit

Regarding this edit: "31TH" is a transmission designation, not an ordinal number. I don't know how AWB works but please make note of this so other occurrences of this won't get mistakenly changed. Thanks. --Sable232 (talk) 02:26, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so sorry, I don't know how did I have done it. Some other of this designations I have skipped, but this ... Thanx for revert --Diwas (talk) 02:38, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your Juggling World Records edit

Regarding this edit: The erroneous "62th" is in the title at the top of this web page outside of Wikipedia. Is it Wikipedia policy to correct errors in text from external sources or keep the error in the citation, so that it matches the title of the page that is being cited? If you haven't looked at that page, please do so and let me know what you think. Thanar (talk) 06:33, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have thought, we do not need to multiply those misspellings. There will be many copies of Wikipedia texts. If the page will be moved it will be more difficult to find it by corrected title, but possibly the page title will be corrected and our citation will be wrong. But I don't know if there are a policy and you may revert it if you are thinking that's better. Another case, of course, are a the citation of written historic texts. A citation of written historic texts with misspellings, we will copy exactly with errors. I hope you will understand my very bad english. --Diwas (talk) 23:23, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

After researching the Wikipedia policies on this, I believe that the sic template should be used instead of correcting the error in the quoted title. You may also want to read this for further understanding. Thanar (talk) 06:33, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I used the template now. --Diwas (talk) 13:24, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your AWB edits

I am having a hard time making sense of the edit summary you are using for your most recent automated edits. Just wanted to let you know in case thats not what you meant. jorgenev 22:42, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry i did not wanted to write a long comment. There are some numbers (ordinals) with the wrong ordinal suffix th like 21th. I guess it should be 21st. But I do not know if it should be 11th or 25th or .. And I do not investigate if it is absolutely sure a ordinal number and not an abbreviation. --Diwas (talk) 22:52, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I understand now. Carry on, sorry for bothering you. Just note that 'I guess, this was a bad ordinal suffix th using AWB' isn't crystal clear. jorgenev 22:58, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Colombia, copyedit, competitions?

In this edit, what does "This is a competitions related article" mean? tedder (talk) 16:10, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry my information was not very specific. There are some ranks in the infobox, I see population_density_rank=172th 172th is senseless. I don't know, if 172nd is correct or another rank, or if we need this rank. --Diwas (talk) 16:22, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Grebbeberg

What is the problem on Grebbeberg that you put such an ungly tag on it? Night of the Big Wind _talk 17:51, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the link in the tag: Ordinals. There are only two ordinals just below the tag. 8th is correct but 22th is a senseless string of characters. Thanx for your work. Unfortunately I haven't time to investigate hundreds of wrong military unit names in wikipedia. --Diwas (talk) 18:17, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you fix it when you know something is wrong? Night of the Big Wind _talk 18:21, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'd tried to explain it, I know something is wrong, but I havn't time to investigate what are the correct names of all the military units like 22th regiment, 91th squadron, 52th division and the correct ranks of states and companies und the ranks and places of sportspeople. I don't know if the author means 22nd or 24th or 20th or 220th or 12th.--Diwas (talk) 18:40, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is a ridiculous exercise. If you know how to spell it, you can also fix it. This is just laziness. Night of the Big Wind _talk 18:42, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Next time, give me the list of articles that have to get fixed. This is completely senseless and annoying! Night of the Big Wind _talk 18:44, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How you wished the little leftover:

Glenn Greenwald 293th
Gresham, Oregon 253th
Habib Umar bin Hafiz 33th
Harlingen High School 81th
Henry Hudson Parkway 253th
History of football in Tibet and the diaspora 21th
Hong Kong at the 2011 Summer Universiade 22th
Illinois Army National Guard 131th
Jeremy Van Hoof 222th
Jiang (江) (surname) 141th
Jimmy Connors 43th
Jozy Altidore 63th
Kepler Input Catalog 253th
Kerala School Kalolsavam 51th
Kham football team 22th
Lahore District 21th
Lakewood, Colorado 172th

--Diwas (talk) 19:15, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Night of the Big Wind _talk 21:06, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. --Diwas (talk) 21:39, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

... And how you wished, a little leftover: see User:Diwas/Ordinals --Diwas (talk) 01:38, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks you!

Thanks for your contribution on Maidashi. Thanks you.--Hot cake syrup (talk) 03:08, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Janus

I agree, could you pls. tell me the location? The article is long...Aldrasto11 (talk) 14:53, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall check Gagé's articles, be patient, they are long...I suppose there is no explanation though.Aldrasto11 (talk) 05:59, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ordinal suffixes - Minister for Foreign Affairs (Japan)

I am indonesian citizen.yeahhh.ok.

Thank you very much for reading my hinds. Best regards --Diwas (talk) 11:37, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Diwas. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2011 September 18.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback

Hello, Diwas. You have new messages at Template talk:Cite Oregon Geographic Names.
Message added 22:57, 10 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Little Mountain 5 22:57, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback III

Hello, Diwas. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Infoboxes.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Redrose64 (talk) 16:53, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Diwas. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Diwas. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Diwas. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Diwas. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Diwas! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:07, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]