User talk:Diaadeen

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created, as you did with Prime Group Egypt. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 11:20, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Prime Group Egypt. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 11:33, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Prime Group Egypt. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 11:44, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Prime Group Egypt. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 11:53, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Prime Group Egypt. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 12:01, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Prime Group Egypt. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 12:05, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Prime Group Egypt. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 12:10, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Prime Group Egypt. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 12:25, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Prime Group Egypt. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 12:30, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Prime Group Egypt. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 12:32, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Prime Group Egypt. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 12:34, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Prime Group Japan

A tag has been placed on Prime Group Japan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:23, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Prime Group

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Prime Group, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Prime Group and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Gilo ö 07:57, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

The article Prime Group has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:34, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shireen Alkady

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Shireen Alkady, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.primegroup.org/Default.aspx?tabid=202. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:36, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shireen Alkady

A tag has been placed on Shireen Alkady requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:40, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]