User talk:DanEverett45
Welcome
[edit]
|
September 2016
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to 2016 California wildfires, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.
It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 03:51, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Canyon Fire 2016
[edit]Please be careful about 2 things. First, the reference you added for the Canyon Fire on 2016 California wildfires does not show the acreage, only that such a fire exist. Second, please note where Canyon Fire links... Be sure to check these things in the future. Keep up the work! --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 05:51, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Cedar Fire
[edit]Please check your sources. Once again your references do not support what you are stating in the article. InciWeb shows the fire as still being only 98% contained. --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:01, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Please Respond
[edit]Dan, I have tried multiple times to engage in conversation with you about your edits and you have failed to respond. I can see that you are trying to edit in a constructive manner but there are a number of issues with the edits you are making. Wikipedia is a collaborative encyclopedia. For it to function, we must all work together. You are currently blocked (block was performed by KrakatoaKatie who is an admin, please note that I am NOT an admin). This block is largely due to the fact that you have failed to engage in any type of dialogue with me. Please, PLEASE respond to these messages. You can respond on your page here using the {{ping}} template or by starting a new section on my talk page. I want to help you be a constructive editor! --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:23, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Monticello Fire for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Monticello Fire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monticello Fire until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 08:23, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello, SL93, terribly sorry. I'm very new to this talk-page process despite my working on article crafting. Is there a specific reason why you feel my article on the Monticello incident is worthy of deletion? Was my creator of the page inadequate? --DanEverett45 (talk) 08:37, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
SL93 I understand your position in this deletion process, however, I hope you consider my writing for the Monticello incident worthy of keeping.--DanEverett45 (talk) 09:05, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
- There is a chance that the article could be kept. I did start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Notability#Wildfires, Notability, and Not News RfC about similar wildfire articles in general. Feel free to comment there. SL93 (talk) 09:09, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Wall Fire (Wildfire)
[edit]Hi Dan! Just wanted to thank you for creating the Wall_Fire_(Wildfire) page..I live in Oroville and am still under watch because of this inferno. :-\ I've been updating the latest facts and figures twice-daily as CalFire updates incident page, and will be adding image(s) once things calm down and more photos roll in. Thanks again for the effort! :)
-Caleb Lambert Cclambert07 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cclambert07 (talk • contribs) 02:51, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Of course Cclambert07! I'm so terribly sorry to hear how you've been affected so directly because of this incident-- I'm glad you're alright tho! My goal is to make the article about the Wall fire and fires like it so far this year become good solid articles on Wiki for further accessible research. Perhaps this could be a good collaborative effort! The fire is mostly contained now which sure is a good thing. Still incredibly unfortunate to see such devastation done by the fire. Thank you for your contributions as well! They're deeply appreciate! --DanEverett45 (talk) 13:23, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi DanEverett45,
You may want to have a look at this California fire page as it's likely well out of date. Regards, --220 of Borg 03:51, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Thank you for your efforts with the Detwiler Fire page! --Cameron11598 (Talk) 00:24, 21 July 2017 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, DanEverett45. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, DanEverett45. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, DanEverett45. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Butts Fire) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Butts Fire.
User:Lefcentreright while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
Good article!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Lefcentreright}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Lefcentreright (talk) 08:52, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
@Lefcentreright: Thank you very kindly, means a lot! DanEverett45 (talk) 08:56, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |