Jump to content

User talk:Cyclopia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello Cyclopia and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

The Signpost: 5 June 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 19 June 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 3 July 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 17 July 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 1 August 2023

[edit]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Office Assistant on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Rumble (company) on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 August 2023

[edit]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chaetognatha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Photoreceptor.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 August 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 16 September 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 3 October 2023

[edit]

Always precious

[edit]

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:50, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, I see this only now. Thanks, I guess! :) cyclopiaspeak! 15:00, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 October 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 6 November 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 20 November 2023

[edit]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Seasonal hyperacute panuveitis

[edit]

On 2 December 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Seasonal hyperacute panuveitis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that white moths are suspected to cause seasonal hyperacute panuveitis in Nepal? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Seasonal hyperacute panuveitis. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Seasonal hyperacute panuveitis), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 December 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 24 December 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 10 January 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 31 January 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 13 February 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 2 March 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 29 March 2024

[edit]

DYK nomination of Destruction of the Moon

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Destruction of the Moon at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 23:12, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, apologies - Due to unexpected circumstances am extremely busy at the moment, so I cannot work on the article now. It's okay if the DYK didn't work. Many thanks for your pings and sorry for any inconvenience! cyclopiaspeak! 10:47, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 April 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 16 May 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 8 June 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 4 July 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 22 July 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 14 August 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 4 September 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 26 September 2024

[edit]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Bitcoin on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 19 October 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 6 November 2024

[edit]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Notability (academic journals) on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There must be a difference on our systems

[edit]

On my system, I was SHRINKING the lead photo, by a significant amount, at Penis with both edits. Were my edits making it larger on yours? Very odd. Frankly, your reducing it a further 20px wasn't much of a change but I'm fine with it. Must have been a system difference though, since every time you said I was enlarging it, it was shrinking on my copy. Jtrevor99 (talk) 16:10, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On my browser (Chrome) it was definitely larger. The 20px reduction put it in the same width of the infobox. What is your system? We could share screenshots and, if there is actually a difference in rendering, ask what is going on technically. cyclopiaspeak! 16:15, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, that's interesting. I'm using Edge Chromium so wouldn't have expected much of a difference. I'll do a test revert so I can capture a screenshot, hang on. Jtrevor99 (talk) 16:17, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You don't need to revert, just use the history. cyclopiaspeak! 16:20, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here you can find the difference. cyclopiaspeak! 16:20, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah thanks! I wasn't actually going to revert; I was just capturing screenshots from the previews. That's handy, thanks. Jtrevor99 (talk) 16:22, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Available here https://easyupload.io/2vm2ly. I suspect the "original" image (with no width specified, last image) was at a 495px width as that's the preview size. Current version of Edge is 130.0.2849.80 64-bit. Jtrevor99 (talk) 16:28, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand. On your file, it is clear that your 440px edit is clearly larger, exactly as I saw. cyclopiaspeak! 16:37, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah no sorry, missed the last page! Ok that's indeed different from my case, and weird. I wonder if it is also because I use another skin (Monobook)? cyclopiaspeak! 16:38, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, that could be...I'm still using Vector Legacy. Maybe that's the difference? Eh, regardless, it's resolved now! Jtrevor99 (talk) 16:41, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The skin seems to make no difference. Firefox on my system (Ubuntu Linux) shows the original image in this edit small as well. cyclopiaspeak! 16:42, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, then that IS weird. Maybe something particular to Edge Chromium or my specific setup? I checked the image differences on my iPhone (Safari) and the 440px and no-width images appeared the same there also. Jtrevor99 (talk) 16:45, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just tried Chrome on my system; 440px and no-width are the same size there too. Jtrevor99 (talk) 16:46, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it's Edge. The images I posted were on my work computer; when I switch to my personal, 440px and no-width appear the same there also. The work laptop is used heavily for graphics editing and publications, so perhaps there's some atypical default setting that's mucking with the browser? I'll have to do more exploration. Jtrevor99 (talk) 16:51, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 November 2024

[edit]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Earth on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 December 2024

[edit]

FYI

[edit]

Tardigrade is going through GAN now. I'm responding to the reviewer's comments. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:20, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd better add (not sure if you saw the above, maybe not) that the concern is that the text has drifted from the cited sources. Over the years a very large number of sources of variable quality have been added, and many parts of the text have been edited at random so that it is close to impossible to see what text came from which source, if indeed some of it wasn't WP:OR. Anyway, I am now in the process not just of GAN but of fixing the OR/years of editing/wobbly source issue in the middle of the review, so it'd be much appreciated if you could hold off for now. After the review we can of course discuss further improvements. Many thanks! All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:25, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, sorry! cyclopiaspeak! 15:32, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Gosh, that was a sharp intervention in the GAN. I've replied there, but in future it'd really be appreciated if you'd have discussions like that on my (or your) talk page as it's less likely to disrupt the GAN. Reviewers are hard to find, the GAN queue is long (often many months), and the last thing one wants is to have to start over. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:49, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I understand the concern, but I believe -for transparency and consistency- that discussions about article content belong to the article talk page, and given that your recent substantial edits were related to the GAN process, I felt the discussion belonged there. After all, we have no deadline. Thanks! cyclopiaspeak! 22:00, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 December 2024

[edit]