User talk:Cox wasan
Hi Cox wasan,
WP:PORNBIO: "2. Has received nominations for well-known awards in multiple years". I think someone who has received 11 noms (including "Performer of the year" and "Best new starlet") between 2006 and 2009 passes this guideline, isn't it? --Cavarrone (talk) 12:19, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
This has been re-nominated for deletion following a listing on AN/I and removal of substantial puffery. As a user with ownership issues that hint at CoI has canvassed selectively, and omitted notifying you (who voted delete) when called on the one-sidedness of their canvassing, I'm taking this opportunity to alert you to the re-listing. --77.100.209.249 (talk) 12:32, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 23:15, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Alerts
[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
- MrX 🖋 13:30, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Biden article
[edit]Cox wasan, I see you referring to a neighbor of Tara Reade as a "witness" in the article about Reade's sexual assault allegation. A witness is a person who has observed the act in question. It is false and misleading to refer to the new individual as a "witness" and that violates Wikipedia's policy on content about living persons. Please rephrase all wording in which you referred to this individual as a new "witness". Thank you. SPECIFICO talk 23:23, 27 April 2020 (UTC)