User talk:BrownNotorious

BrownNotorious, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi BrownNotorious! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:03, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

FC Drita

Pershendetje

1. Se pari ju keshilloj qe te qetesoheni, une mirrem me dizajn grafik, ajo qe e ke marr ti nuk eshte logo, i kom koplet logot ne full HD te te gjithave klubeve te Gjilanit, pra ju lutem keni mirkuptim. Nese e shikoni historin time, ne shumicen e artikujve vetem i perditesoj logot.

2. Sipas kushteve te Wikipedias logot duhet te jene ne formatin .svg, dhe mundesisht te jene ne formatin me te mire te mundshem.

Faliminderit Hakuli (talk) 23:23, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replika

Hakuli: Nese mundesh perpuno ate logon qe e kam marre nga njeri prej anetareve te bordit te FC Drites ne formantin .svg edhe publiko!

Iván Balliu

Hello there, from Portugal,

i am not abusing article as you claim i am, OK? 1 - we don't link countries in infobox, so it's "Spain" not "Spain"; 2 - Mr. Balliu is not a "defender" but a "full-back". If he was a "defender" that would mean he could also play as a "central defender" and he can not.

3 - you say i ABUSE the article, then you write stats in box for ALL competitions then box should only contain LEAGUE stats, no cups. Also, per WP:FOOTY guidelines, we can only write caps (in this case for Albania) when he makes debut, not before (but OK no problem, we can leave that if it's so important to you); 4 - you say i ABUSE the article, then you remove completely valid new categories i had just inserted, like "Albanian expatriate footballers".

Attentively --Quite A Character (talk) 18:51, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No reply whatsoever even though i was polite. OK, sorry to BOTHER you. --Quite A Character (talk) 21:26, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, BrownNotorious. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leonard Pllana (January 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lee Vilenski was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sadly, he still hasn't played a game in a professional League, and thus doesn't meet WP:NFOOTY. This one has been deleted a few times for this. he'll be ready for inclusion if he plays in the Allsvenskan though.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Leonard Pllana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Leonard Pllana, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:45, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Ardit Gashi

Hi, I'm Boleyn. BrownNotorious, thanks for creating Ardit Gashi!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has beent agged for 2 issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 22:03, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leonard Pllana (February 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lee Vilenski was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Player does not meet WP:FOOTY, and will not be ready for inclusion until he does.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Leonard Pllana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Leonard Pllana, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:54, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Faton Maloku

Hello BrownNotorious,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Faton Maloku for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Natureium (talk) 19:55, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Flag carrier, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 17:03, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Football in Kosovo, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Kosack (talk) 17:20, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Timothy Weah. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Giant Snowman 19:38, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, BrownNotorious. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 17:45, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]