User talk:Bolialia

This is Bolialia's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Thank you, I do appreaciate we kept respect even we holds an opposite viewpoint. Have a day.=--Jobas (talk) 19:09, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome and have a nice day! Regards, Bolialia (talk) 19:11, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Growth of religion

Hello, in my opinion it is still early, we still need to improve the sections about the growth of the other religions. There is alot of information about Islam and Christianity, and few about others- as Bahá'í Faith etc-. Have a nice day. -- Jobas (talk) 08:01, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is a good assessment. I do agree with that other religion sections can be improved if compared with Islam and Christianity sections. Wish you the same and may God bless you.--Bolialia (talk) 08:10, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bolialia. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Lazy Trader

The article The Lazy Trader has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of, nor even claim of, notability for the site itself. WP:BEFORE shows zero material actually about the site. Appears to have been created as a spam article. Has never been up to standard as a Wikipedia article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 08:29, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]