User talk:BangladeshiEditorInSylhet

Assalamualaikum, If you wanna talk to me, Just leave a message in this talk page. I have a Phone Number but I prefer not to say it for now. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet. 9:32 PM, 23 November 2024. (Bangladesh Time).

Welcome, Macarius Ibne Mito!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Macarius Ibne Mito! I'm Mujinga, and I've been assigned as your mentor. About half of new Wikipedia accounts receive a mentor chosen randomly from a list of volunteers. It just means I'm here to help with anything you need! We need to have all kinds of people working together to create an online encyclopedia, so I'm glad you're here. Over time, you will figure out what you enjoy doing the most on Wikipedia.

You might have noticed that you have access to a tutorial and suggested edits. It's recommended that you take advantage of this, as it'll make learning how to edit Wikipedia easier.

If you need assistance with anything or have any questions, click on the "Get editing help" button on the bottom right corner of your screen. This will open up a module with links to help pages and a place to ask me questions. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or go here to get help from the wider community.

Again, welcome to Wikipedia! Mujinga (talk) 12:03, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hi Macarius Ibne Mito! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Attacks on schools during the Israeli invasion of Gaza that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Speederzzz (Talk) (Stalk me) 09:53, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Speederzzz Sorry, I will change the edit summary next time if i edit. Macarius Ibne Mito (talk) 10:34, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Selfstudier (talk) 11:13, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Only cite reliable sources

Thank you for your interest in contributing to the article Bangladesh genocide. However, please do not cite sources such as modern day newspaper editorials, opinion pieces, or commentary for matters of historical fact. Such a source is reliable only for documenting the opinion of the writer (such as a reviewer's feeling about a film).

Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (history) describes the best sort of sources to use in articles about history, generally scholarly works written by historians or academics in allied fields. Other sources may express views that are widely acknowledged as pushing a particular point-of-view, sometimes even extremist, being promotional in nature, or relying heavily on biased narratives and personal opinions.

If you require further assistance, please look at Wikipedia:Reliable sources, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 07:35, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clean

Could you please clean North South University, BAF Shaheen College Dhaka and Daffodil International University. 37.111.207.77 (talk) 18:01, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@37.111.207.77 I'll try BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 04:05, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you plz update the new principal name of BAFSD to the article according to their website. 37.111.194.85 (talk) 05:12, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@37.111.194.85 I'll try. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 06:38, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Stop editwarring on Battle of Bint Jbeil. The last 12 edits to the page have been you and מתיאל making the same trivial revert of each other. Take content issues to the talk page. Also, this edit summary is unacceptable. Longhornsg (talk) 19:53, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate edit summaries

Edit summaries like this and this are not constructive. Calling sources deprecated because you disagree with them and throwing around Zionist is not constructive. Also calling Zionists terrorists on your userpage is WP:POLEMIC, so I removed that. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May I add that the current statements on this editor's talkpage, calling to "remove Pro-Zionist statements on Wikipedia, The Pro-Zionist or Pro-Western editing lowers the credibility of Wikipedia and makes it less reliable", raise possible issues of WP:NOTHERE, WP:RGW and contribute to the growing battleground behavior we see in this topic area. 916crdshn (talk) 17:59, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hi, I noticed you removed a helpful link without explanation in this edit on World War II.

Checking your edit history, I see that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. For me, it would have sped up the process of finding the edit where the change occurred, as well as understanding any reasoning behind it.

Even a short summary is better than no summary, and they're particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may want to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your editing preferences.

Thanks! — W.andrea (talk) 22:52, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinks and edit summaries

I noticed that you have been making changes to wikilinks which were complying with WP:MOS before your changes. You have then used types of style that are not recommended with no description of your actions in the edit summary. Please have a look at the guidance on MOS:PIPESTYLE which explains how to treat plurals and other derived names. I see that other editors have already commented about you using no edit summaries (or inappropriate phrases) on your talk page and have given you feedback on actions that you should take. Drchriswilliams (talk) 12:20, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the DCWC!

Welcome to the 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest, BangladeshiEditorInSylhet! The contest is now open for submissions. List your work at your submissions page to earn points. If you haven't done so already, please review the following:

Got open nominations? List them at review requests.
Looking for a topic to work on? Check out suggested articles and eligible reviews.
Not sure if your article qualifies? See the guidelines for more information or contact a coordinator for verification.
New to Wikipedia? Many experienced editors are part of this contest and willing to help; feel free to ask questions about the contest on the talk page.
Know someone else who might be interested? Sign-ups remain open until 15 July, so don't hesitate to invite other editors!

On behalf of the coordinators, we hope you enjoy participating and wish you good luck! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 20:23, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Romanized text

How to write romanized text in wikipedia? Can you help me about this. Lahsim Niasoh (talk) 15:19, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Lahsim Niasoh Sure, Just go to Google Translate, Translate the English text to whatever language you selected to be translated to, underneath the translated text.

Then, There is the romanized text. If it does not work, or you don’t understand, reply. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 15:51, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, Thank you so much. Lahsim Niasoh (talk) 16:34, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1958 East Pakistan-India border clash for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1958 East Pakistan-India border clash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1958 East Pakistan-India border clash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Georgethedragonslayer (talk) 10:00, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Short description capitalization

WP:SHORTDESC are not titles, and as such should use sentence case (e.g., only capitalize first letter and proper nouns). Please don't apply title case as you did here. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 12:59, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ohnoitsjamie Alright. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 13:00, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, per WP:SDNONE, articles like this have self-explanatory titles and should not have short descriptions. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:02, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 12:55, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DCWC August update

The 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest has now been running for a month, and we've already seen some momentous improvement in the quality of many articles about underrepresented subjects! So far, our top-scoring participants are:

Magentic Manifestations (submissions) – 338 points, mainly from nine good articles. He's a contender for the "most submissions for a single country" specialty award, with nine submissions for India.
Arconning (submissions) – 305 points, including from six seasonally-appropriate Olympics-related good articles.
Generalissima (submissions) – 290 points, the bulk from her featured article about Greenlandic interpreter Qalaherriaq and two China-related good articles.
AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) – 245 points, mostly from the achievement of bringing Genghis Khan to featured status.
Thebiguglyalien (submissions) – 144 points from three good articles, including two about Kiribati elections, and four reviews of good article nominees.

Looking for ways to climb up the leaderboard yourself? Help out your fellow participants by answering a few review requests, particularly the older entries. Several more nominations needing attention are listed at eligible reviews, and highlighed entries receive a 1.5× multiplier! The coordinators would like to extend a special thanks to Thebiguglyalien (submissions) for his commitment to keeping these review pages up to date.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 14:24, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Bangladesh Army, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. In particular, please familiarize yourself with the Manual of Style related to capitalization. In general, only proper nouns and beginning of sentences get capitalized. – macaddct1984 ^{(talk | contribs)} 13:58, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 16:05, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Belbury Ok, Sure. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 16:07, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ramu Cantonment English School and College

Hello, BangladeshiEditorInSylhet,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Pppery and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Ramu Cantonment English School and College, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Pppery}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:14, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Anything I should attempt to prevent deletion of the page? BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 16:36, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2014 Bangladesh-Myanmar border skirmish for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2014 Bangladesh-Myanmar border skirmish is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Bangladesh-Myanmar border skirmish until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Worldbruce (talk) 06:52, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 12:54, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unhelpful links, polluting meta data

Internal links are not all good. Within citations, the work may be linked "if relevant". It does not have to be linked, and is not always relevant. The purpose of citations is to allow readers to find the source that supports the information that cites it.

I can't imagine any situation in which linking Dhaka Tribune or bdnews24.com makes a source easier to find, the name alone is quite sufficient. If the source is obscure, has a name that has varied significantly over the years, or has a common name that might easily be confused with a different source, and has no other identifying information (such as a url) then a link might be relevant.

Although The Daily Star is not a unique name for a newspaper, it is generally obvious from context whether the Bangladeshi or Lebanese paper is meant. I would only link a citation to The Daily Star (Bangladesh) in an article where both newspapers are cited, or an article about a Lebanese topic, where a reader might otherwise assume The Daily Star (Lebanon) was meant.

Never, never, ever add "BD" to the end of the name of a work. The newspapers are named The Daily Star and Daily Sun, not The Daily Star BD or Daily Sun BD. Please clean up this pollution anywhere you've done it.

If you are at a loss for things to do, check out:

Worldbruce (talk) 17:39, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've cleaned up the "|work=<newspaper name> BD" mess for you.

You make some useful edits, which are sincerely appreciated. In your recent ones, however, for every one that fixes something, another creates a new problem. Editors are allowed to make mistakes, and maybe you're just having a bad day, but that is not a good ratio of beneficial to detrimental edits. Successful contributors to Wikipedia find something they're good at and stick to it. Some editors, for example, concentrate on images or categories because they aren't fluent in English. If you're great at spelling or punctuation, but weak on capitalization rules, focus on what you're good at and leave the rest to other editors who have different strengths. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:08, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Worldbruce Alright, Please notify me if I make that mistake again. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 07:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Parbatta News for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Parbatta News is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parbatta News until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 16:18, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paharer Alo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paharer Alo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paharer Alo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 16:30, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Radio Capital (Dhaka), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page World News. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Daily Jalalabad

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Daily Jalalabad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daily Jalalabad. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 08:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@আফতাবুজ্জামান No, this is not my first page, Sure I'll contest the deletion. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 08:33, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mohammadpur A. Gafur Government Primary School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohammadpur A. Gafur Government Primary School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammadpur A. Gafur Government Primary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 08:35, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Riverview Cantonment Board School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Riverview Cantonment Board School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riverview Cantonment Board School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 08:38, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jalalabad Cantonment English School And College for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jalalabad Cantonment English School And College is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jalalabad Cantonment English School And College until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Worldbruce (talk) 06:40, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 08:49, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summaries

I might make mistakes in edit summaries. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 14:04, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 1

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Manab Zamin

added a link pointing to Alexa

Md Shafeenul Islam

added a link pointing to The Telegraph

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 12:49, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DCWC September update

The Developing Countries WikiContest has now been running for two months, and we've seen tremendous improvement in the encyclopedic coverage of several underrepresented areas from a wide range of editors! The coordinators would like to highlght some of the newer faces who have been making notable contributions in the contest, including but by no means limited to:

Arconning (submissions) – 386 points, with several good articles primarily relating to the Olympics
Vigilantcosmicpenguin (submissions) – 141 points, who created multiple articles about abortion rights and laws in African countries
TheNuggeteer (submissions) – 126 points, who has contributed to several articles associated with the Phillippines
Jaguarnik (submissions) – 125 points, with several good article reviews and an appearance in the In the news section of the Main Page
Averageuntitleduser (submissions) – 119 points, and has written about several Haitian topics and historical figures.

Only one month remains until the end of the contest, so it's time to make your remaining nominations! Please consider answering some review requests, particularly the older entries, as a way of helping out your fellow participants and moving up the leaderboard. Good luck!

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 12:48, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ibrahim al-Maqadma Mosque attack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaza.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2005 Bangladesh-India border clash for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2005 Bangladesh-India border clash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2005 Bangladesh-India border clash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Nxcrypto Message 16:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dainik Khagrachari

The article Dainik Khagrachari has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The only "independent" source cited is the self-published dailybanglanewspapers.com, a directory listing which has no reputation for accuracy or fact checking. They say their data was collected by searching Google. Searches of the usual types in English and Bengali found no sources that would meet WP:GNG, WP:NMEDIA, or WP:NPERIODICAL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Worldbruce (talk) 23:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Daily Rangamati

The article Daily Rangamati has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Searches of the usual types in English and Bengali found mentions in lists of newspapers, passing mentions in connection with the local press club or in lists of event attendees, and one article in an obscure newspaper saying that three staffers were among five journalists acquitted in what appears to be a routine-course-of-business legal case.[1] No sources that would meet WP:GNG, WP:NMEDIA, or WP:NPERIODICAL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Worldbruce (talk) 23:10, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Daily Rangamati for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daily Rangamati is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daily Rangamati until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Worldbruce (talk) 05:31, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2019 Bangladesh-Indian border clash for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2019 Bangladesh-Indian border clash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 Bangladesh-Indian border clash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Nxcrypto Message 14:32, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1979 Bangladesh-Indian skirmishes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1979 Bangladesh-Indian skirmishes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1979 Bangladesh-Indian skirmishes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Nxcrypto Message 14:34, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sheikh Hasina. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ratnahastin (talk) 14:09, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ratnahastin What was disruptive? BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 14:54, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ratnahastin Please tell me, What was disruptive. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 14:55, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You removed the undisputed fact that Mujib was the founder of Bangladesh without explaining why. That was disruptive. Ratnahastin (talk) 15:18, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ratnahastin Mujib was not the founding father of Bangladesh, I first thought about that fact in September. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 15:21, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ratnahastin Please provide me with a source from Independent publishers that describes Mujib to be matching with what makes someone be titled the founding father and It's definition. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 15:23, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If a correct source is given, then your argument is correct. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 15:25, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Ratnahastin (talk) 13:21, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ratnahastin Okay. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 13:42, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prothom Alo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Additionally, editors must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert on the same page within 24 hours for pages within this topic. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics.

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Hassan Nasrallah for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 09:45, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BangladeshiEditorInSylhet,

Reading your User page, it seems like you might be here to "Right great wrongs". Please read the linked page. Be sure your content contributions embody a neutral point of view especially when writing about foreign or national conflicts, in the past or present. You don't have to be neutral but your writing must. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:52, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz How is removing not neutral content, a violation of NPOV? I agree some of my edits are horrible, but the argument that has been presented is wrong. And, I just wanted genocides to be known, Welcome. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 12:02, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz I have read it, You are right that I should agree with NPOV but removing non-neutral content is not a violation of NPOV. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 12:03, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Theleekycauldron Ok? BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 12:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

How are you? Please 01812668660 inbox me? MD Hydrogen 123 (talk) 06:22, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MD Hydrogen 123 I am well, What am i supposed to do With that number? BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 07:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please communicate

I have to talk to you about Wikipedia related articles. 01812668660 WhatsApp. MD Hydrogen 123 (talk) 09:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MD Hydrogen 123 Um ok, I will send message but you can talk on this talk page as well. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 09:50, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Communicate

I want to learn something about how to upload photo/logos in Wikipedia. So please SMS me over the WhatsApp? Thanks. MD Hydrogen 123 (talk) 09:52, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gafur Bahini for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gafur Bahini is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gafur Bahini until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Nxcrypto Message 09:17, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary/incorrect addition of commas at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion

Hi BangladeshiEditorInSylhet. Would you please:

stop making incorrect/unnecessary additions of commas to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (or similar editing to this or any other pages)
if you do make necessary correct edits, please avoid flooding editors' watchlists by making a bunch of trivial edits instead of only one or only a few.

You are likely headed for a block if you continue (I am not an admin; this is advice from a fellow editor). 11:26, 3 October 2024 (UTC) ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 11:26, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hydronium Hydroxide What incorrect commas did I type? I am trying to remove grammatical issues, that's all. Ok, If I make multiple edits, what is the problem? I should edit less? BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 11:34, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Literally every single comma you added was incorrect. You've done this across multiple pages. Please familiarise yourself with the rules of English punctuation before you copyedit pages, especially highly-visible policy pages. – Joe (talk) 11:40, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Joe Roe I now agree that some of them were incorrect, but a few were correct, approximately 4. i have also added commas to pages, that were correct. I am familiar with some rules of English Punctuation. Blocking someone Just Because of Commas is ridiculous. What if someone else that contributed heavily to the encyclopedia gets blocked because of Commas, If i make mistakes, Notify me. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 11:50, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Joe Roe Sure, I will be cautioned during editing of highly known pages. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 11:53, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I did here. When someone reverts a bunch of your edits, it's time to stop, not immediately make even more of them. That's when we start talking about disruptive editing and blocks. – Joe (talk) 12:01, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Joe Roe First of all, the reverts were conducted 1 hour after the revision. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 12:07, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Joe Roe I didn’t make the revision right after many edits were reverted, It was not reverted at that time. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 12:11, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @BangladeshiEditorInSylhet: Joe reverted your edit at 15:36, and just 3 minutes later, you started adding the commas again. This is what Joe is referring to. GrabUp - Talk 12:17, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GrabUp Oh, He reverted it? BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 12:19, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You get a notification when it happens. You should read those. – Joe (talk) 12:30, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Joe Roe I use my phone most of the time and I don’t put my notifications on, because my battery runs out quickly, I just check my talk pages. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 12:39, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Joe Roe Can I add a comma after a date such as: "In 12 March 2001 they formed a organisation", Can I type a comma after the date? BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 15:22, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, you generally don't use commas after introductory clauses in English when they're less than five or so words. It also should be "On 12 March 2001..." – Joe (talk) 10:16, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Joe Roe Oh, I write commas in sentences like, "In 1950, It was founded" BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 10:18, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a correct use of a comma in English. – Joe (talk) 10:21, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Joe Roe Something new learned. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 10:22, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As an example, [2] changes the meaning of the sentence (the original is restricted to "articles which may be bundled"; inserting a comma makes it refer to the unrestricted set of all articles, and states that these can be bundled). [3] has much the same problem. The problem with multiple trivial edits in a row is that it makes the page show up 15 times in Special:Watchlist. The exact same changes in 1-3 edits would still be equally incorrect, but far less distracting. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 11:56, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hydronium Hydroxide Ok. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 12:07, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hydronium Hydroxide Fine, I understand the example. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 12:08, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I came to your talk page a couple hours ago to start a similar discussion. As a non-native speaker you obviously and understandably have some trouble with English grammar. In many of your edits and stubs, random words are capitalized. Many of your punctuation edits, as explained by @Hydronium Hydroxide, may change the meaning of the sentence subtilely, which makes reversion extremely challenging. Some of your grammatical edits are just unnecessary. [4] In these cases it'd be best to refrain from making the edit.

Other grammatic edits are fundamentally wrong, like adding commata after "Although" [5] or "While" [6] at the beginning of a sentence.

Another thing I've seen a lot while looking through your edits is random capitalizations of words that shouldn't be capitalized.

I would recommend focusing on the things you do best, and, as a non-native speaker, check your grammar edits before publishing them. I believe I have a decent grasp of English grammar, and still, I make sure to be quite certain about my edits.

Wikipedia is not about quantity, it's largely about quality. If, for example, you took more care creating articles, your talk page would probably not be riddled with so many notices of deletion. fschu (talk) 13:47, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Fschu Yeah I should've been more logical while creating pages, I didn’t know many things about Wikipedia at that time, and still sometimes make inaccuracies. Yes, I am not from a country that speaks English but I did learn better English over the years at educational institutions. Many times, I think that a comma is necessary for grammatical accuracy, Fine I'll Check. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 15:00, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ramu Cantonment Public School and College for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ramu Cantonment Public School and College is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramu Cantonment Public School and College until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Nxcrypto Message 11:56, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lalmonirhat Cantonment Public School And College for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lalmonirhat Cantonment Public School And College is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lalmonirhat Cantonment Public School And College until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Nxcrypto Message 12:11, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rajendrapur Cantonment Public School and College for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rajendrapur Cantonment Public School and College is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajendrapur Cantonment Public School and College until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Nxcrypto Message 12:16, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rajshahi Cantonment Board School And College for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rajshahi Cantonment Board School And College is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajshahi Cantonment Board School And College until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Nxcrypto Message 12:20, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DCWC closing update

The 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest has come to a close! After a thrilling finish to the event with a slew of submissions on the final day, we have our winners. With 608 points, Thebiguglyalien (submissions) comes in third with his series of Kiribati and Botswanan submissions; BeanieFan11 (submissions) flies into second place at the last second with 771 points after a string of good articles about sportspersons; and after leading for much of contest's three months, Generalissima (submissions) finishes with a whopping 798 points to take home the Gold Belt Buckle. Congratulations to our winners!

In addition to his spot in the top three, BeanieFan11 (submissions) also wins the special awards for submitting under the most countries (44 countries) and for writing the most articles about women (15 Did you know? nominations)! Magentic Manifestations (submissions), after making 16 submissions under the Indian flag—15 of them good articles—receives the awards for most submissions for a single country and most featured or good articles promoted. For their submission of one FAC review, five FLC reviews, and 20 GAN reviews, Simongraham (submissions) wins for most article reviews.

The results of the contest have far exceeded any expectations the coordinators had for it at the beginning: among the submissions to the event were 3 FAs, 10 FLs, 88 GAs, dozens of article reviews of every kind, and more Did you know? submissions than we can count! Regardless of your level of participation, every contestant can be proud to have contributed towards a major step in countering the systemic bias on Wikipedia. Every year, millions of readers and editors around the globe use Wikipedia to educate themselves and communicate with others about parts of the world that often receive less attention than they deserve. Thank you for participating with us in the contest and contributing to this effort. The DCWC will return next year and we look forward to seeing you contribute again! However, before that...

We need your feedback! Join the conversation on the talk page to discuss your reflections on the contest (even if you didn't participate!) and help us make it better.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 19:02, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

Hey dude, this may be a glitch or something but can you add 4 of these ~ to sign yourself properly because you may be doing 3 of ~ The reply button doesn't appear as I am trying to agree with you in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gafur Bahini If you don't understand look at WP:AFDFORMAT 79lives (talk) 14:40, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dainik Shiksha for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dainik Shiksha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dainik Shiksha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sayful Ialam (talk) 16:27, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sayful Ialam Sure. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 17:13, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:38, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BangladeshiEditorInSylhet,

You are not signing your posts correctly. Please use FOUR tildes, not three or five. You are only leaving your username without a date and time. Please remember to sign your comments on noticeboards, talk pages and deletion discussions correctly. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:40, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz Ok Sure. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 11:41, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages such as Talk:East Pakistan are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. ZimZalaBim ^talk 18:00, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ZimZalaBim Ok! BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 11:40, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ZimZalaBim Oh, I should not create a topic With no goal to Improve a page? BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 11:41, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creating a topic on an article's talk page with the goal to improve the article is indeed precisely what talk pages are for. What you did, however, was just create a section that said "Ok". That isn't helpful. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 13:20, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Daily Ajker Jamalpur for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Daily Ajker Jamalpur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Daily Ajker Jamalpur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sayful Ialam (talk) 04:20, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Delwar Hossain Sayeedi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page International Crimes Tribunal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DPL bot Oh. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 04:08, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

يحيى إبراهيم حسن السنوار

يحيى إبراهيم حسن السنوار يحيى إبراهيم حسن السنوار (talk) 13:55, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@يحيى إبراهيم حسن السنوار اَلسَلامُ عَلَيْكُم BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 04:08, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Help me to develop an Draft to an article

I have started an Draft Draft:2024 Bangladesh internet blackout. Can you help me! Gaplow43286 (talk) 06:05, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gaplow43286 Ok, I'll help, I just came back From School, I have to do tutor a few minutes later, After I finish my work, I will help. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 08:11, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gaplow43286 I told the tutor to come later, I will be busy from 4:00-6:00, I'm gonna help in editing now. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 08:41, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're just fixing typos

Please add references and more Information Gaplow43286 (talk) 08:46, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gaplow43286 Yes, I will add references, We should make the page understandable. I Will add citations now, Bad grammar doesn't help viewers. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 08:47, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gaplow43286 See? I added citations. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 09:06, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Gaplow43286 (talk) 09:07, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gaplow43286 I am not busy now, I will help more now. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 11:43, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Our draft has been improved. 3 editors working on the draft. Just cheek!

But there is cn tag and one section completely empty. Gaplow43286 (talk) 08:56, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hamas,talk

Hello. Just to inform you, that I've answerd you on Talk:Hamas. --~~ Corriebertus (talk) 05:40, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Corriebertus Ok. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 07:57, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Corriebertus I am also informing you, that you made some mistakes in your response (grammar-related). BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 16:54, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your userboxes (what is the good of such boxes anyway?)

Hello BangladeshiEditorInSylhet. You are student, probably young, possibly boisterous. But I wonder: what is the good, in saying on your user page, that you are “against Communism”? Isn’t ‘communism’ a thing with hundreds of definitions? Bad things happen in Russia, North Korea etc., purportedly in the name of ‘communism’, but it seems not wise to me, and not logical, to blame ‘communism’ for those bad things. Also: you believe “the Western World is a threat”. I happen to live in Western Europe (ten countries with their 222 million inhabitants), but I wonder: in what way and how do those “states”, or “nations” (if nations exist at all—I’m not sure they do), or 222 million people, ‘threaten’, and what do they threaten? Sure, a lot of dubious or lamentable actions are perpetrated by governments in U.S. and Western Europe – but can’t that be said of more states in the world? --~~ Corriebertus (talk) 18:16, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Corriebertus I was looking for some templates to put in my userbox, I just implemented them without properly seeing the result. I agree not every Westerner is threatening to others, No person is born and becomes a danger, instead people become it later on. The governments and government affiliates are problematic and corrupt, I don't hate Communism because of the countries that implement it, There are other reasons. Sure I'll remove those templates. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 02:36, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikibreak

I'm taking a semi-break from Wikipedia. I have important difficult exams at school that I have to study for. I will be unable to edit Wikipedia as much as I used to. Inshallah/God willing I will return to editing more again. @User:Stranger43286 @User:Mehedi Abedin BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 14:20, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will edit still, that's no problem but it is difficult. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 11:39, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Style issues

Why are you removing commas e.g. here? They are not optional. Please re-add them wherever you've removed them to date. Also, please stop wikilinking publishers that don't yet have articles within citations, that's a place where we don't want redlinks. Remsense ‥ 论 03:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Remsense Oh ok. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 03:46, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Remsense I got a message on my talk page, a few weeks ago and I thought that I should remove incorrect commas, so I began and I might've made some incorrect revisions. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 03:50, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

fellow editor from sylhet

Hello, where are you from in Sylhet? Therealbey (talk) 14:57, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Therealbey I'm from Sylhet District but I live in Dhaka and study at Bangladesh International School & College (Nirjhor). BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 17:27, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh i see. where in sylhet district? Therealbey (talk) 18:31, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Therealbey Dakshin Surma Upazila and near (Area is Close to) Renga Hajiganj. I am from a area in South Surma (Dakshin Surma Upazila) which is not too far from Renga Hajiganj. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 01:27, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

okay 👍🏻 I am very near of it from Golapganj. Nice to see an editor's origin from near me in Wikipedia! Best if luck to you. Therealbey (talk) 04:32, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Therealbey Next time when I return to Sylhet with my family, I'll try to visit Golapganj if I can. Thanks, May Allah Bless you. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 05:00, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Therealbey Also I am kindly asking for you to fix your grammar and others.

You said:

"Okay I am very near of it from Golapganj. Nice to see an editor's origin from near me in Wikipedia! Best if luck to you"

You are supposed to say:

"Okay I am close to that area, I am from Golapganj. Nice to see a editor's origin close to me in Wikipedia! Best of luck given by Allah (God) to you" BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 05:08, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, you too! You should correct your vowel. You said, "Dakshin Surma Upazila and near (area is close to) Renga Hajiganj. I am from a area in South Surma (Dakshin Surma Upazila), which is not too far from Renga Hajiganj. You were supposed to say an right? But put that vowel aside. I was talking freely and raw; I didn't even check the grammar. Therealbey (talk) 10:18, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Therealbey Ok, I just want people to speak properly and clearly so other people can understand and give a proper response. Thanks for also giving me information about how I forgot to write a vowel. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 10:30, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, that's ok. Therealbey (talk) 10:38, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Therealbey We Should also improve pages and create pages related to Sylhet. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 10:41, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Metro stations articles

Every article has their own style, For metro stations we don't to write "metro station" on the infobox. Mehedi Abedin 15:04, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mehedi Abedin Oh ok, I thought people may accidentally think it was the area, not the metro station that it is based on. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 15:39, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creating new pages

I Will create new pages and begin editing tomorrow Inshallah. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 16:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was unable to do it. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 08:16, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An Draft

I have made an draft Course of the Iraq War. beacuse section in main article is too long.

After finishing the draft, I will remove the section and linked to new page. Can you help? BangladeshiStranger🇧🇩 (talk) 12:13, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Stranger43286 Yeah sure, I can help. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 12:16, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Stranger43286 In pages that I edit, I first add internal links and fix stuff or others then I add citations and Improve it overall. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 12:18, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do Know Me?

Hi @BangladeshiEditorInSylhet. it is not an sockpuppetry. I logged out. Guess my account. 180.149.232.103 (talk) 08:18, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@180.149.232.103 I don't know your account, I can't guess. You tell me. While logged out, do not make edits that will result in consequences for you. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 08:21, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It’s me! BangladeshiStranger🇧🇩 (talk) 09:09, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Stranger43286 Ok. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 14:55, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

The purpose of edit summaries is to provide a meaningful summary of your changes so that other editors don't have to waste their time opening up your edits to see what changes you made. An edit summary of "Some stuff" is of no help. Obi2canibe (talk) 21:47, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Obi2canibe Ok fine, I'll give more information in edit summaries. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 08:25, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

I have less focused on Bangladesh-related events, because There's no new informations.

I'm currently focusing on American politics for this month. BangladeshiStranger🇧🇩 (talk) 14:10, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Stranger43286 Ok. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 16:16, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]