User talk:Alexzarach

Welcome!

Hello, Alexzarach, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

If you are interested in Russia-related topics, you may want to check out the WikiProject Russia and its task forces, the Russia Portal and the project discussion page. You might even want to add these pages to your watchlist.

Again, welcome! ~Adjwilley (talk) 00:26, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Small airline articles

It may be better to create a list of small airlines of Russia with a paragraph on each, as they will mostly fail notability guidelines and be nominated for deletion. This is better for Wikipedia, as it wouldn't get cluttered with lots of small articles of limited value.Petebutt (talk) 00:53, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant idea, so a column on airline name and founding date etc. (general info), a column saying what they do and a column on their fleet, and maybe a column with a photo of one of their aircraft. Think that would work? I did all those articles as many of those airlines have hardly any information and all of it's scattered round the internet in different languages so I think it's good to finally bring all the information together. Alexzarach (talk) 01:03, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good, maybe in table format; see Help:Table and/or Template:Table Petebutt (talk) 02:27, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds like a great idea. Let me know if you need help with the tables. ~Adjwilley (talk) 22:03, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to get something done before the 18th as I'm off to Minsk and Israel for two weeks after that. I should be fine with the table but if I have any problems I might well take you up on your offer. Small airlines - what would you classify as 'small'? I'm thinking those aerial service airlines with a couple of An-2 aircraft or helicopters. Should I do another list List of Helicopter Airlines of Russia? There are tons of them and yet many could hardly be called small. Alexzarach (talk) 23:05, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I just deleted two of the articles you marked for deletion, but wouldn't it make more sense to redirect them to the new article instead? Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:29, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for starting to delete them, I would have done it myself had I been allowed to! I don't want to keep the pages as redirects just because the Wikipedia fascists would get quite cross at so many redirects linking to one list; I don't want to risk it. I think I will leave it to your discretion if you want to redirect them to List of small airlines and helicopter airlines of Russia or notAlexzarach (talk) 18:40, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I personally haven't really ran in to any fascists here, but I very much doubt that anyone would object to redirects. Could you tell me the location of the list? Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 19:19, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've run into them, they're not interested on your point of view or any reasoning behind your articles! The list is List of small airlines and helicopter airlines of Russia, [1]. Thank you very much, any you'd like me to do? Alexzarach (talk) 19:25, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think I got all off them. If I left any, feel free to do those yourself. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 19:54, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of VIP airlines of Russia

Hello, just letting you know that this list you created today is being discussed at the WikiProject Airlines talk page. You are welcome to participate, and your comments would be much appreciated. Thanks, Comp dude¹²³ 20:48, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see you took my suggestion literally. I was unaware at the time that there were existing lists. A merge would probably be a good idea.Petebutt (talk) 05:15, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The thing is the main list exists but is a different kind of table, it doesn't have a column with descriptions of the airlines because each has its own page. These small airlines wouldn't warrant their own page (at least that's the view generally forced down my throat) which is why I went with the idea of having a small airline list. Then there was the issue of the 'VIP airlines' (private jet charter, but that phrase seems to be unique to Russia) which did not really fit into the main list so I made another list for them. Took over a week to research and page a page on each small airline to stop there being so many red links on the 'list of airlines of Russia' page, spent a whole day yesterday doing the separate lists. I know there is too much text in the new lists - can't remove the description column in the small airlines list as none of them have their own page anymore. The VIP list has some airlines without their own page (as some only procure planes from other airlines so apparently don't deserve a page of their own) so the description column is needed for those airlines. It just seems people suggest one thing without doing research, I spend several hours following a suggestion through, then I get people grumbling about it on another talk page (at least I was invited to dicsuss after a while) Alexzarach (talk) 11:11, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Such is the way of wikipedia. The way forward is a list o or lists of some kind. with NOTABLE airlines having separate articles. Good effort though even if a little misguided.Petebutt (talk) 14:01, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The thing is the airlines have fleets, incidents etc. (the less notable ones) - how can those be incorporated into lists? With so many different people with so many different yet strong views I understand - that is the way of Wikipedia (harsh judgement and a guilty-unless-proven-innocent view). I will be abroad from the 18th for two weeks but I can spend chunks of my holiday sorting this out if people can actually come to a decision on what to do with all those airlines (while retaining the descriptions, fleets and incidents because those are of encyclopaedic value) Alexzarach (talk) 14:05, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

Hi. When you recently edited List of small airlines and helicopter airlines of Russia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Samara, Bykovo and Pavlovsky (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of VIM-Aviaservice for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article VIM-Aviaservice is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VIM-Aviaservice until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. XXN, 01:11, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vzlet

The article Vzlet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable company. Defunct as of 2014.[2] The two article contains two refs: The first ref is an indiscriminate directory listing. The second ref is a deadlink - Waybackmachine shows it was a holding company, clearly not an independent RS. Russian Wikipedia has no article for this company. A significant Google source search (including in Russian), turned up only indiscriminate directory listings, user-generated posts, and similar unusable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alsee (talk) 16:21, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aerofreight Airlines for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aerofreight Airlines is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aerofreight Airlines until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

T v x1 22:16, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sirius-Aero

The article Sirius-Aero has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. (The claim of being "the largest in Europe" almost certainly not true.)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:02, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]