User talk:Agenthercules14

Agenthercules14, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Agenthercules14! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021

Please stop removing "WWE" from the lead of articles. Thank you! JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 23:15, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 23:21, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021 redux

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in professional wrestling. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

LM2000 (talk) 04:43, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PPV event infobox

Please stop changing the formatting, such as you did here and across all of WWE's PPV event articles. We don't need the full name of the show with the year in parenthesis. The year is enough, unless a specific event had different name. This is at least twice now that you've been reverted on this. At the very least, explain your reasoning before making these changes again. --JDC808 ♫ 06:23, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you need consensus to make these widespread changes. Consider going to WT:PW to make your case. If you continue to make these changes then you will be reported.LM2000 (talk) 21:58, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed you keep changing what I've done in making the years smaller in the infobox. They were made smaller to make the infobox cleaner and tidier. I've explained this a few times in edit summaries, but you keep changing it back. You are also failing to use the edit summary to explain why you keep making these changes despite being reverted multiple times. I see you are fairly new here. If you are reverted and you make the change again, please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning. --JDC808 ♫ 11:25, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are still changing things despite explanations being given, and you are still failing to use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for why you are making your changes. This is a final warning that you will be reported for your failure to communicate and continued reverting of content despite your edits being contended. --JDC808 ♫ 15:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021 ANI report

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. JDC808 ♫ 09:15, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 13:05, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Agenthercules14. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 01:55, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]