User talk:Aducci

Welcome!

Hello, Aducci, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Georgia

Hi, I've noticed that on a lot of your mixed martial arts pages you have been linking to Georgia. This is a disambiguation page, and shouldn't normally be linked to. The correct link for the American state is Georgia (U.S. state). Thanks, DuncanHill (talk) 20:43, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've caught most of them already - I keep an eye on links to Georgia. Best wishes, DuncanHill (talk) 21:22, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adding categories to Mixed Martial Artists

Greetings, I see that you've added a bunch of MMA articles, which have falled onto the "Uncategorized Pages" category. Would you mind adding a category section to the bottoms of your contributions? It will make them easier to find, and will keep them off the "Uncategorized Pages" list. Thanks. MatthewVanitas (talk) 10:25, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carlos Morena

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Carlos Morena, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? aktsu (talk) 11:50, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Marcelo Mello

A tag has been placed on Marcelo Mello, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Aktsu (talk) 23:46, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Marcelo Mello

A tag has been placed on Marcelo Mello requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Aktsu (talk) 23:47, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Achmed Labasanov

I have nominated Achmed Labasanov, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Achmed Labasanov. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. --aktsu ^(t / c) 08:45, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eugenio Tadeu, Joe Charles, Iouri Kotchkine and Alfonso Alcarez

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Eugenio Tadeu, Joe Charles, Iouri Kotchkine and Alfonso Alcarez suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Notability. No significant coverage of the subject.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --aktsu ^(t / c) 08:47, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Leo Sylvest, Eddie Ruiz, Keigo Kunihara, Curtis Brigham and Jake Short

I have nominated multiple article that you created, for deletion. I do not think these articles satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leo Sylvest, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eddie Ruiz, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keigo Kunihara, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curtis Brigham and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Short Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. --aktsu ^(t / c) 11:46, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Flavio Luiz Moura

The article Flavio Luiz Moura has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability: lack of fights in major/notable promotions.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --aktsu ^(t / c) 00:24, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Aducci! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 368 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Joao Roque - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Tait Fletcher - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 08:06, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mikhail Illoukhine

The article Mikhail Illoukhine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Barely sourced since 2008; not clear that the source is entirely independent; notability therefore unclear.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SlimVirgin ^{talk contribs} 07:54, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Mike Groves

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Mike Groves. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Groves. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Joe Sampieri

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Joe Sampieri. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Sampieri. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fabiano Scherner

The article Fabiano Scherner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not cite any reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Jeff G. ツ 02:52, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Fabiano Scherner

I have nominated Fabiano Scherner, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fabiano Scherner. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — Jeff G. ツ 03:38, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Amaury Bitetti

The article Amaury Bitetti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article does not provide reliable sources to show that the subject meets WP:NSPORTS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dkchana (talk) 19:49, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Petition to have flagicons returned to fighter pages

I have started a petition in the hopes of having flagicons returned to fighters pages. Sign here if you would like to help. Thank you.

Proposed deletion of Rex Holman

The article Rex Holman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsource BLP that covers an apparent non-notable MMA fighter.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TreyGeek (talk) 16:55, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chris Haseman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Haseman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Haseman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. LlamaAl (talk) 01:05, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Koji Oishi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Koji Oishi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koji Oishi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. LlamaAl (talk) 01:09, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of CJ Fernandes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CJ Fernandes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CJ Fernandes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. LlamaAl (talk) 01:10, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Travis Galbraith for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Travis Galbraith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travis Galbraith until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. LlamaAl (talk) 01:14, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tom Murphy (fighter) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tom Murphy (fighter) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Murphy (fighter) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. LlamaAl (talk) 03:17, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ron Faircloth for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ron Faircloth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Faircloth until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. LlamaAl (talk) 03:18, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James Lee (fighter) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Lee (fighter) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Lee (fighter) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. LlamaAl (talk) 13:28, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Phil Johns for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phil Johns is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Johns until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. LlamaAl (talk) 01:58, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Halverson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Halverson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Halverson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Beerest 2 talk 20:40, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alex Andrade (fighter) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alex Andrade (fighter) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Andrade (fighter) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:04, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Phillip Miller for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phillip Miller is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phillip Miller until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.