User talk:A-lú-mih
merger
[edit]Hi, I thought that comment you made on that merger I proposed was rather funny.--Glas (talk) 07:44, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I saw that you were a native Min Nan / Taiwanese speaker and I wondered if you could help me with the Frank Hsieh page. Basically the question is how you pronounce, in Taiwanese, the family name 謝. I have only ever known that character to be pronounced siā, as in dō siā, 'thank you'. Do you know if there is an alternate way of pronouncing it, if it's being used as a name? Thanks, Alex. Alexwoods (talk) 22:46, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. Based on what you told me about there being two pronunciations of the name, I've reverted my own change in the article. Alexwoods (talk) 18:32, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
June 2008
[edit] Hi there, welcome to Wikipedia. I'm not sure why you changed this, but I thought I would mention that talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion and editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Cell nucleus, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tim Vickers (talk) 18:39, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Typing
[edit]Why the I may not typing semester as fullwidth size. R8o6d4e0d0 (talk) 09:19, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
A tag has been placed on Aimee Sun requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ecoleetage (talk) 17:54, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Aimee Sun
[edit]I removed the Speedy Delete tag, as per the addition of your references from the Taiwan media. Good job! I hope this did not create any stress. Ecoleetage (talk) 18:21, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
July 21 DYK
[edit]--Bedford Pray 21:43, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you
[edit]--Jose77 (talk) 04:44, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Zang Fu viscera Box
[edit]You rule. The box you made enhances the organization of the article and associated subpages alot. Keep up the good work. --Shaggorama (talk) 06:33, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Fruit photo
[edit]Hi, your fruit photo is excellent but misleading, in that only the darker green fruits in the middle are sugar-apples; the rest are "pineapple shijia" (Atemoya), a different species of Annona. Badagnani (talk) 00:58, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Romance of the Three Kingdoms TV series
[edit]Hi. I noticed that you were an editor of this article, and I was wondering if maybe you knew where or how to purchase the DVDs for the series. Also, any chance of them having English subtitles? Thanks in advance for any help! —GodhevalT C W 20:58, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Sawndip
[edit]Dear Luuva,
the three sample Zhuang characters, sawndip, added are very interesting, they are widely used they are not in Unicode yet. Where did the images come from?
JohnKn63
Johnkn63 (talk) 09:52, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Thank-you for the reply on my talk page. I added a little the description of the three characters in both the English and Chinese versions (please do correct any errors in the Chinese), I don't know Korean and so was not able to change the description there. Regards Johnkn63 (talk) 03:19, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Local Churches.svg)
[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:Local Churches.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:26, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
CALL TO REFORM: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese), ---4--- Names of groups
[edit]CALL TO REFORM: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese), ---4--- Names of groups
My point is that the linguistics box should include the romanizations appliable to the correspondent chinese characters, both in simplified and traditional chinese... For instance, in the ROC, we can see IN THE LINGUISTICS BOX both the simplified and the traditional form, and the appliable transliterations: In the country infobox we only see the traditional variant, CAUSE THATS THE OFFICIAL ONE THERE... DPP has its own linguistics box and its own political party box, where we only see the traditional variant, the same applies to some newspapers, TV channels... and so on...
Im interested in such a move, cause there is no a clear standard.. just today another contributor suggested to undo my reform of the "KMT" page, cause i added a lingustics infobox, with wiktionary links, and erased the simplified fomr FROM THE POLITICAL INFOBOX, where it shouldn't be... If we add simplified to the political party infobox, we should add simplified too to the ROC country infobox, where its not the official script, and well, that makes no sense...
I dunno if I should ask for support, or just unilaterally declare it a new policy... If somebody created that infobox, well, y dont we use it? Gumuhua (talk) 17:34, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit] Hello Luuva! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 729 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Kao Ching-yuen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Cheng-Wen Wu - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- James C. Wang - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:53, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
CfD nomination of Category:TV commercial actors
[edit]I have nominated Category:TV commercial actors (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Television commercial actors (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:28, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
CfD nomination of Category:Taiwanese TV commercial actors
[edit]I have nominated Category:Taiwanese TV commercial actors (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Taiwanese television commercial actors (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:28, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Dorothy Stowe
[edit]Nice job on the Dorothy Stowe article. Thanks for creating it. Best, Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 06:42, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks.luuva (talk) 13:41, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Zangfu
[edit]Template:Zangfu has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DH85868993 (talk) 09:43, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Luuva. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Luuva. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Category:L. Frank Baum has been nominated for discussion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
Category:L. Frank Baum, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 03:49, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Category:Hakka songs has been nominated for discussion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
Category:Hakka songs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 18:57, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, A-lú-mih. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, A-lú-mih. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wayne Pai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.