User talk:103.190.179.16
RFC
[edit]Please read wp:rfc the most important thing is the question must be neutral, and editorialising should not be part of teh RFC itself, but rather a separate comment. Slatersteven (talk) 14:17, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Really, you need to stop with this line immediately: if you actually have read or have internalized any of the talk page arguments you claim to have read first, you would know perfectly well why we don't do this. Remsense ‥ 论 14:23, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Why? Because of polling? 103.190.179.16 (talk) 14:26, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- We call things what sources call them. You cannot read a single paragraph of discussion in the archives without someone stating this point. Sources do not generally call Taiwan a "de facto country". Remsense ‥ 论 14:27, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
103.190.179.16 (talk) 14:32, 22 October 2024 (UTC)We have no real dispute about if Taiwan is de facto a country (has an army, currency, navy, passport, internet TLD, telephone country code, etc.
I'm closing this RfC as finding consensus that it is best to refer to Taiwan as a "country" rather than as a "state".)— WP:TWRFC- We also have no real dispute that Taiwan is a sovereign state. But we do not call it that because our sources don't. Remsense ‥ 论 14:33, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- ????? really???? what about ones who reliplied as coungtry? 103.190.179.16 (talk) 14:35, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not really sure what the confusion is, but I'll try to answer: things can have multiple correct descriptions, but we pick the one that is most widely attested in sources. We call Taipei a city, but there's no real dispute that it is also an urban settlement. Remsense ‥ 论 14:40, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Let's discuss peacefully.
A consensus decision takes into account all of the proper concerns raised. Ideally, it arrives with an absence of objections, but often we must settle for as wide an agreement as can be reached. When there is no wide agreement, consensus-building involves adapting the proposal to bring in dissenters without losing those who accepted the initial proposal.
- We have no real dispute about if Taiwan is de facto a country while some disagree country or state. 103.190.179.16 (talk) 14:56, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Again, we have no dispute about a lot of things: most things are de facto things, that's what de facto means. I am a de facto Wikipedia editor. You'd only specify if you want to draw attention to something in particular—our sources generally do not do this, so it would be unbalanced for us to do so, just as it would be to refer to Taiwan as a "country on Earth" or "country whose name begins with the letter T". Remsense ‥ 论 14:58, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- But there are huge disputes whether TW a country, state or sth. Just like what Slatersteven said, it is very complex. We should describe it in a less disputive way. Can't you get the point? 103.190.179.16 (talk) 15:03, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- That's exactly why we begin with merely "country", because anything more specific would be less representative of the sources. Remsense ‥ 论 15:08, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Don't you understand the complexity of Taiwan? Is the example you cited relevant to this matter? 103.190.179.16 (talk) 15:04, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- These issues are discussed in the actual article. In the introduction, we articulate a summary that is as brief and representative as possible. If readers would like to know more, they would read the article. Remsense ‥ 论 15:09, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- But there are huge disputes whether TW a country, state or sth. Just like what Slatersteven said, it is very complex. We should describe it in a less disputive way. Can't you get the point? 103.190.179.16 (talk) 15:03, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Again, we have no dispute about a lot of things: most things are de facto things, that's what de facto means. I am a de facto Wikipedia editor. You'd only specify if you want to draw attention to something in particular—our sources generally do not do this, so it would be unbalanced for us to do so, just as it would be to refer to Taiwan as a "country on Earth" or "country whose name begins with the letter T". Remsense ‥ 论 14:58, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not really sure what the confusion is, but I'll try to answer: things can have multiple correct descriptions, but we pick the one that is most widely attested in sources. We call Taipei a city, but there's no real dispute that it is also an urban settlement. Remsense ‥ 论 14:40, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- ????? really???? what about ones who reliplied as coungtry? 103.190.179.16 (talk) 14:35, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- We also have no real dispute that Taiwan is a sovereign state. But we do not call it that because our sources don't. Remsense ‥ 论 14:33, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- We call things what sources call them. You cannot read a single paragraph of discussion in the archives without someone stating this point. Sources do not generally call Taiwan a "de facto country". Remsense ‥ 论 14:27, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Why? Because of polling? 103.190.179.16 (talk) 14:26, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Remsense is keeping me from doing so. and why... suddenly close and delete? I wish you could guide me. 103.190.179.16 (talk)
- I will leave them to answer why they are doing it, but its not neutral wodred for a start. Slatersteven (talk) 14:31, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
I think you need to drop this and read wp:tenditious before you are blocked as a time sink. Slatersteven (talk) 15:15, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- ???? 103.190.179.16 (talk) 15:44, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- There are huge disputes whether Taiwan a country but Wikipedia stand with "country" by describing it a country. I think its much more tenditious. You know, we won't say these when talking bout us, uk etc. 103.190.179.16 (talk) 15:51, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'll articulate it like this: we can't invent our own phraseology. Our sources mostly use "country", some do not and would dispute country. We can discuss that dispute, but what we cannot do is decide to introduce a new form "de facto country" that none of our sources use. WP:NPOV means presenting all the positions, not trying to find a new average position between them. Remsense ‥ 论 16:07, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- I have a question. Is the "
our sources mostly use 'country'
" you mentioned obsolete? I don't know where this statistic comes from. I heard that Google ranks search results based on page views, and I tried to count the top results, but found that they seem to prefer "island", even when there are many context about countries, such as flags. 103.190.179.16 (talk) 13:47, 29 October 2024 (UTC)- No. Feel free to actually read the RFC. Remsense ‥ 论 19:55, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm so sorry that the discussion is too long for me to grab what accually useful. 103.190.179.16 (talk) 10:58, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- The close at the top of the RFC summarises it. Slatersteven (talk) 11:23, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Emmm i have noticed that but it just said the consensus formed numerically, choosing country rather than state (but not de facto country) and no real dispute about if Taiwan is de facto a country. So IMO da facto country is the better choice. 103.190.179.16 (talk) 11:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- But we go by what RS say, not what they do not say. Slatersteven (talk) 11:54, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Emmm i have noticed that but it just said the consensus formed numerically, choosing country rather than state (but not de facto country) and no real dispute about if Taiwan is de facto a country. So IMO da facto country is the better choice. 103.190.179.16 (talk) 11:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- The close at the top of the RFC summarises it. Slatersteven (talk) 11:23, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'm so sorry that the discussion is too long for me to grab what accually useful. 103.190.179.16 (talk) 10:58, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- No. Feel free to actually read the RFC. Remsense ‥ 论 19:55, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- I have a question. Is the "
- I'll articulate it like this: we can't invent our own phraseology. Our sources mostly use "country", some do not and would dispute country. We can discuss that dispute, but what we cannot do is decide to introduce a new form "de facto country" that none of our sources use. WP:NPOV means presenting all the positions, not trying to find a new average position between them. Remsense ‥ 论 16:07, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- There are huge disputes whether Taiwan a country but Wikipedia stand with "country" by describing it a country. I think its much more tenditious. You know, we won't say these when talking bout us, uk etc. 103.190.179.16 (talk) 15:51, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia!
[edit]I'm Ad Orientem, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Although you're free to perform most tasks on Wikipedia without registering, it's highly recommended you create an account as there are many added benefits. It's private and secure and it's also free, simple, and quick to do.
Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{Help me}}
here on your talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. If you register an account, you can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you could put a link to it on your user page.
Please remember to:
- Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes
~~~~
at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your IP address linked to your contributions page (however, if you create an account, your IP address will be hidden and you will be able to build a custom signature that can link to your own user page), a link to this IP's talk page, and a timestamp. - Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
Sincerely, Ad Orientem (talk) (Leave me a message) 07:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Ad Orientem (talk) 07:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Answers to your reverted questions about Taiwan
[edit]"If just to say Taiwan is RoC, does that mean Taiwan ruled mainland before? It sounds so ridiculous. Taiwan is roc currently for sure and we should add "currently" to the article. 103.190.179.16 (talk) 5:42 am, 4 November 2024, last Monday (2 days ago) (UTC−5)" You will notice that I said "currently". I don't see where you are getting your ridiculous idea that Taiwan ruled the mainland. At no point does the article claim anything like that, nor is anyone arguing for that. The state of the RoC ruled over the mainland (and for a time the island of Taiwan) as the country of China. Since 1949 the state of the RoC has ruled over the island of Taiwan as the country of Taiwan.
"How does Taiwan itself become a country instead of being the common name of the country RoC? Did anyone announce the country of Taiwan was founded? Or the country of Taiwan was founded by nature? 103.190.179.16 (talk) 5:37 am, 4 November 2024, last Monday (2 days ago) (UTC−5)" Taiwan becomes a country by virtue of being a reasonably large chunk of ground inhabited by people. The RoC is not a country. It is a state. You keep confusing the two. --User:Khajidha (talk) (contributions) 16:17, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |