User talk:삭은사과

United Future Party

Hi Regarding the UFP info. we do not use the term president or parliament leader. Please use official name and information according to the info. of party official of the UFP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.46.125.253 (talk) 00:48, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Liberty Korea Party

There has been some discussion on the talk page about LKP's political spectrum. I wish you could join the discussion. Jeff6045 (talk) 00:45, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

삭은사과, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi 삭은사과! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Social Democratic Party (UK). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You have attempted the same unsourced alterations before - please stop. David J Johnson (talk) 09:13, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Wikiproject!

Hello, 삭은사과! I saw you recently edited a page related to the Green party and green politics. There is a WikiProject that has been formed - WikiProject Green Politics and I thought this might be something you'd be interested in joining! So please head on over to the project page and take a look! Thanks for your time. Me-123567-Me (talk) 17:02, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, 삭은사과, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Me-123567-Me (talk) 17:02, 23 April 2017 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Help directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of centrist political parties, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages German and Christian Democratic People's Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at United Russia, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:19, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at List of political parties in Poland, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:20, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Law and Justice, It is a right-wing party, It is not a centre-right party. --삭은사과 (talk) 21:16, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

This is not Disruptive editing. --삭은사과 (talk) 21:18, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Not only do we require that you provide sourcing for content you add, we also expect edit summaries to explain why you've removed content. Further, when you've been reverted the thing to do is discuss your edits on the applicable talk page. If you find that multiple editors are reverting your edits, now would be the time to consider how you're attempting to contribute to Wikipedia. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:24, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to New Rights. Jim1138 (talk) 07:10, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

The European People 's Party is a center-right party, IDU is also a centre-right organization, This is not vandalism. --삭은사과 (talk) 07:18, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

References

Adding references is how we ensure that content is valid. Without references, a reader can not easily validate information and there is no presumption of accuracy. See Help:Referencing for beginners and Help:footnotes. This is covered by the Wikipedia policy of wp:verifiability (WP:V). Please wp:cite your edits with wp:reliable sources (RS). Per WP:V unsourced content can be removed. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 07:10, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 15:36, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to United Russia, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:55, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, 삭은사과. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 삭은사과. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 삭은사과. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Without Me (Halsey song), without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Ss112 19:10, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

9 September 2019

I kindly ask you to avoid ad hominem argumentations and accusations, in my talk page we entirely discussed the issue, Fidesz is not a far-right party, even if some criticist media describes them like so (and this is shown in the relevant criticism section of the article), next to other weird accusations etc., I already explained to you it has no connection to my "own thoughts", this has been as well entirely dicussed and the base of the current consensus.(KIENGIR (talk) 10:12, 9 September 2019 (UTC))

@Jeff6045:,

if you write this I have to assume you did not entirely understood the details of our communication. Such epithets like "rational" is a serious POV. I am not familiar with the Liberty Korea Party's affairs, that's why I do not interfere on that, unlike European and Hungarian affairs, that I am very much familar. Contrary to your statements, yes, there has been many discussions, I warn you again to please stop unfolded accusations. Thank You(KIENGIR (talk) 10:38, 9 September 2019 (UTC))

@KIENGIR:,

Sorry, I misunderstood your opinion, my apologies. I will delete my talk on this page. (User:Jeff6045 (talk)

Personally I see Fidesz's political orientation as 'right-wing to far-right.' But I don't think Law and Justice is far-right.--삭은사과 (talk) 11:23, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

@삭은사과:,

Just igore my recent talk. I misunderstood, KIENGIR's opinion. In addition, If you wanto change Law and Justice's political position, please leave your opinion on 'talk' page before you edit. Thank you. Jeff6045, talkJeff6045 11:33, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Liberal Democratic party (Japan)

There has been recent discussion on LDP's Social democratic and pacific factions. Since you have careers on LDP's edit I wish you could join discussion. Thank you. Jeff6045 06:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeff6045 (talk • contribs)

I'm sorry. I'm dyslexic and it'll be hard to participate in that long talk.--삭은사과 (talk) 07:28, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Reply to your indication: Talk: Liberal Democratic Party (Japan)

Thank you very much for your reply. I gave a response to your indication and a supplementary explanation on LDP’s social democratic and pacific factions. Would you mind seeing the talk page and joining discussion ? Thank you. Littlelessleast (talk) 13:22, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Finns party

I have seen you participate many edit on european political party. Since you have interest on european politics I want you to participate discussion on the finns party. Recently some user have given objection to finns party's ideology. They say it is too undue to describe the party as ultranationalist, I want you to give your opinion on the talk page about ultranationalism. I think your opinion can be very helpful for progress on the discussion. Thank you. Jeff6045 00:48, 13 October 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeff6045 (talk • contribs)

In my opinion... I also don't think Finns party is an ultranationalist. Northern European major right-wing populist parties see themselves much more moderate than the major right-wing populist parties of other countries.--삭은사과 (talk) 01:28, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

December 2019

Hello, I'm Wallyfromdilbert. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Radical centrism, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 13:56, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chinese socialism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of right-wing political parties, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Conservative Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:01, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Party of Nationals moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Party of Nationals, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 02:17, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

I've filled in some of the sources. Now I will restore the document's proposition.--삭은사과 (talk) 02:27, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Bareunmirae Party

Hi, I saw that you reverted my edit to the political position. I know that there are some sources describing the party as right-wing, but from my searching, I felt that sources describing the party as centrist or center-right were more widespread and that the sources that did describe the party as right-wing generally did not distinguish "right-wing" from "center-right". Since I'm not Korean, could you let me know if there are reliable Korean sources that do distinguish center-right from right-wing and still call the party right-wing? Thanks. Ezhao02 (talk) 19:05, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

In S. Korean politics, unlike in Europe and the United States, the ideology and spectrum of the party are not often. However, we cannot deny that the right wing had a considerable stake in the Bareunmirae Party. Indeed, Hwang Kyo-ahn, who was the leader of the LKP, often called in right-wingers within the Bareunmirae Party. (#, #)--삭은사과 (talk) 22:22, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for your input. I understand now. Ezhao02 (talk) 23:08, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Kuomintang

Hi, I hope you're doing well. I saw that you added the source The Kuomintang and the democratization of Taiwan to cite "liberal conservatism" on the Kuomintang's page in this edit. If you still have access to this source, could you please add a quote, since it seems kind of difficult to find access to this source? Thanks in advance. Ezhao02 (talk) 16:02, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

United Future Party

한국말이 더 편하신 것 같아 한국말로 하겠습니다. United Future Party에서 Infobox 안에 있는 이념들을 본문에 넣어서 자료 인용을 해주시면 안될까요? 보수주의는 그렇다 쳐도 다른 이념들을 WP:BLUE로 보는 것은 무리일 듯 싶습니다. Res Iudicata (talk) 20:08, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

사회보수주의는 자유한국당, 새로운보수당, 미래를 향한 전진 4.0 모두 기본적으로 가지는 스탠스입니다. 국민보수주의와 반공주의는 자유한국당과 미래를 향한 전진 4.0의 성향입니다. 특히 당 주류는 자유한국당계입니다. 굳이 출처가 필요하지 않습니다. MOS:INFOBOXREF도 확인해주세요.--삭은사과 (talk) 13:11, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Japanese political party and newspaper political position.

Party

Japanese Communist Party - Left-wing to Far-left

Reiwa Shinsengumi - Left-wing

Social Democratic Party - Centre-left to Left-wing

Constitutional Democratic Party - Centre-left to Left-wing

Democratic Party for the People - Centre

Newspaper

Chūnichi Shimbun (Central Japan News) - Left-wing

Asahi Shimbun (Morning Sun News) - Centre-left

Mainichi Shimbun (Daily News) - Centre to Centre-left

DPFP is Conservative? I' think this party is centre-left.--Takanawa Gateway (talk) 08:42, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

• Asahi, Mainichi and Chūnichi Japanese leftist newspaper supported party is Democratic(CDP and DPFP) and Social Democratic. not support Communist.--Takanawa Gateway (talk) 08:45, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

The view that DPFP is center-left is only your own research.--삭은사과 (talk) 08:48, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

The DPFP has a co-fighting relationship with other left-wing opposition parties.--Takanawa Gateway (talk) 08:52, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Japanese rightist newspaper Yomiuri, Nikkei and Sankei is not support DPFP.--Takanawa Gateway (talk) 08:56, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

The current LDP leadership is held by Shinzo Abe, a member of the ultra-nationalist Nippon Kaigi. The fact that the DPFP, which is a "centre to centre-right", is allied with the left-wing camp cannot be grounds for DPFP's tendency to be center-left. We don't take it strangely that there is a right-wing party among the Nation Alliance (Turkey). and See Wikipedia:No original research.--삭은사과 (talk) 08:58, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

That DPFP is a center-left propensity is just your 'origenal research'.--삭은사과 (talk) 09:00, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

×Origenal ○Original. Yūichirō Tamaki, leader of the DPFP, is a progressive. However, he beensed in the debate on constitutional reform and appeared on the far-right (Netto-uyoku) Internet program, Bunkajin Hōsōkyoku, after his remarks.--Takanawa Gateway (talk) 09:08, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

The fact that DPFP is center-right has reliable data such as Freedom House. In DPFP document infobox, do not switch to center-left or remove center-right.--삭은사과 (talk) 09:46, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Political position of Japanese leftist newspaper Asahi, Mainichi and Chunichi? --Takanawa Gateway (talk) 11:58, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Diagnose the political position of the following organizations:

• Nippon Kaigi
• Japanese Society for History Textbook Reform
• Japan First Party--42.127.227.65 (talk) 07:10, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Political position of South Korean political parties

Hi, as I'm not South Korean, I have a couple questions about the political positions of South Korean conservative parties. First, is the New Conservative Party more right-wing than the Bareun Party? I understand that the only source anyone was able to find for the New Conservative Party's position stated that it was right-wing, but I feel like that the lack of sources is due to the party's short life. Could the New Conservative Party be considered center-right to right-wing like the Bareun Party?

My second question is about the United Future Party's political position. Is the UFP more right-wing than the Saenuri Party was before Park Geun-hye's presidency? From the limited knowledge I have, it seems like the UFP and the Saenuri Party are basically the same in terms of members, so couldn't the UFP also be considered center-right to right-wing? (This source describes the UFP as center-right.)

Thanks in advance for your help. Ezhao02 (talk) 15:22, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

UFP has a source that says it is far-right. Also, the party's personnel composition has not been replaced by more conservative figures, but the party as a whole has turned rightward to far-right populist tendencies.--삭은사과 (talk) 21:34, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. Was the same generally true for the New Conservative Party? Ezhao02 (talk) 16:05, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Yes. The NCP turned to the right more than the Bareun Party, and Ha Tae-kyung, a major politician, had considerable controversy over right-wing populism.--삭은사과 (talk) 22:08, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your explanation. Ezhao02 (talk) 13:45, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of social democratic parties, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Democratic Socialist Party and Socialist Democratic Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Union of Right Forces

Hi, I noticed that you partially reverted my edit to the political position on the article "Union of Right Forces" (I'm not sure how it took so long for me to see!). Can you send me the source you found calling the Union of Right Sources "right-wing", just so I can verify it? Also, even though the party's name has the word "Right" in it, this can't be used for the political position because it's a primary source and because it could mean anything from "center to center-right" to "far-right". Thanks, Ezhao02 (talk) 01:58, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

# From that source, SPS is described as 'right-wing' and Yabloko as 'social liberal'.--삭은사과 (talk) 02:10, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! Ezhao02 (talk) 12:55, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Serbian Progressive Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Springer

Socialist Party of Serbia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Springer

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

All India Trinamool Congress

Hello, I've noticed that you reverted the "political position" and "ideology" of All India Trinamool Congress to an iteration which uses questionable sources. Primary sources like the official website of the party can not be used for its ideology if its not supported by secondary sources. For the "political position", Election.in is also a self publishing sources while Daily News & Analysis is largely unreliable, neither of which are usable and can not carry anywhere near the same weight as academic publications; please do not remove the latter. Moreover, the party has near no presence in Kerala so it is practically irrelevant to provide an assertion like that in the hidden comments; which itself is an exercise in original research regardlessly. Therefore, I've reverted back your edit but if you can provide reliable sources which are in line with your intended edit, then I'm happy to revert them back. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 05:44, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

'Left-wing populism' and 'centre-right' are completely contradictory.--삭은사과 (talk) 06:02, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Can't one use left-wing populist rhetoric while also implementing center-right policy? I don't think its that clear cut. And even if we assume that, then "left-wing populism" should be removed since it is sourced to only one news outlet. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 06:17, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

I've replaced Left-wing populism with Populism as most sources which discuss them as populist do not give it a "left-wing" qualifier. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 06:35, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Serbian Progressive Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Springer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Croatian Democratic Union

Hi, what should we do about this? I've started a discussion already, as you can see in my last edit. Ezhao02 (talk) 18:06, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

I thought I should let you know that I reported the user involved here. (I tried to ping you, but I'm not sure if it worked. Ezhao02 (talk) 17:53, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Talk:Kibō no Tō#Pre-merger and post-merger distinction

Hi, did you see my ping at Talk:Kibō no Tō#Pre-merger and post-merger distinction? Thanks, Ezhao02 (talk) 19:00, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)