User:Timmy12

Harassments

• User:Timmy12/1rst plea for heal to Admin
• /from Admininistors Notice Board Incident
• /from Hanuman Das
• /Hanuman Das
• /on Hanuman Das
• /Hanuman Das on Technical Pump
• /Hanuman Das on my talk page
• /Ekajati
• /Ekajaki on my talk page
• /Techical Pump policy question
• /Admin board 999 warnings
• /Admin boad Harassment by User:Hanuman Das and User:Ekajati
• /999
• /Aguerriero
• /Admin board Question of Importance
• /Admin board Stalking, vandalism, possible sockpuppetry evasion of block by Timmy12
• /about Rosencomet
• /WP:V etc
• /User talk:Anger22

A more pertinent issue to examine might be the probable linkspamming by Rosencomet (talk · contribs) of his website, often using the claim that they're "citations". --Calton | Talk 00:45, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

• [1]

On Rosencomet talk page

-- Vandalism by Timmy12 --

Go [2] here and add a report of your personal experiences with being stalked by Timmy12. Your complaint will carry more weight than mine. I've probably only seen a slice of it. -999 (Talk) 14:06, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Etc

• from User talk:Ekajati 23:59, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[3] - what was actually said v what Ekajaki said

• A long story User:Rosencomet, who is connected to the event, added a lot of information to the Starwood Festival page. He also created (or expanded) pages on a large number of performers who have performed at the event[4]. On each of these pages there is an internal link to Starwood and also exteranl links to the pages to the Starwood site.[5]

--Netsnipe Rosencomet--

• [6] to Netsnipe.

• Rosencomet has a long justification for why he is not who he is.

Rosencomet.com

• and to Netsnipe:nest of interconnecting articles

Apologies

Sorry I went on Thanksgiving break, but I am back now. Geo. 16:10, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Hodebo

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Hodebo, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RedHillian 02:04, 30 March 2007 (UTC)