Jump to content

User:Leutha/Archive 5 (Aug 2012)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Signpost: 02 July 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 09 July 2012

[edit]
[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Royston Cave, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crossroads (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:18, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi Leutha,

I am brand new to Wikipedia, so I'm not sure I'm answering correctly. But I'm very familiar with Bogdanov. (Рядовой! one of his pseudonyms, as I'm sure you know.)

I will definitely follow the link you gave me. Thanks so much.

Рядовой (talk) 03:39, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 July 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 23 July 2012

[edit]
[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Thomas Hibbert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 July 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 06 August 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 13 August 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 20 August 2012

[edit]
[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Tower of London, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frederick III (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:19, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 August 2012

[edit]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George Green (shipbuilder), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Perry and Blackwall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 September 2012

[edit]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gillingham, Kent, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chartist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 September 2012

[edit]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited All-Russian Teachers' Union, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ministry of Education (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 September 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 08 October 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 15 October 2012

[edit]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Watford Palace Theatre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 October 2012

[edit]

Greetings.

[edit]

Hope all is well. I am online at home. Gordo (talk) 13:17, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Greetings from London E14

[edit]

How goes it? Gordo (talk) 14:03, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Articles.

[edit]

Anything for me to check? Daria says that you have been using resources from the centre... Gordo (talk) 16:46, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Greetings from south London

[edit]

Really good seeing you today, looking forward to making things happen! Eartha78 (talk) 19:35, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi!

[edit]

Hi there, well, we already worked together! If you can involve people with those pictures I linked, it would be simply awesome. --Elitre (talk) 19:29, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 October 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 05 November 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 12 November 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 19 November 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 26 November 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 03 December 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 10 December 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 17 December 2012

[edit]

Yo Ho Ho

[edit]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jason Moyo, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Plumtree and Kalanga (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:22, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 31 December 2012

[edit]

The Signpost: 07 January 2013

[edit]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Di Department (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Bossé and Benkadi
Joseph Ki-Zerbo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Toma

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 January 2013

[edit]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited River North Esk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Episcopal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 January 2013

[edit]

Train the trainers agreement

[edit]

Hi Leutha. I don't know if you've seen it already, but you may be interested in this. Yaris678 (talk) 13:23, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 January 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 04 February 2013

[edit]

New article, needs some TCL?

[edit]

Golgonooza Gordo (talk) 10:49, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 February 2013

[edit]

The article Alain le Pichon has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- Patchy1 REF THIS BLP 11:20, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 February 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 25 February 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 04 March 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 11 March 2013

[edit]

The article Albert Łaski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability; minimal sources available, and I cannot see any that cover the subject in great detail.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 12:10, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Albert Łaski for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Albert Łaski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albert Łaski until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GiantSnowman 16:45, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 March 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 25 March 2013

[edit]

Free University of New York

[edit]

Hello, you have edited Free University of New York. I have made some edits, which have provoked the need for discussion, which is taking place on the talk page. I welcome your contribution.--Theredproject (talk) 16:24, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Konstantin Chevkin

[edit]

Hello Leutha,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Konstantin Chevkin for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, ♦ Tentinator ♦ 14:16, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 April 2013

[edit]

RFC at WikiProject Freemasonry

[edit]

This is going out to all active members of WikiProject:Freemasonry. We are attempting to determine the "consensus of the project" on an issue relating to categorization. Please see: WT:WikiProject Freemasonry#Dispute over instructions at Category:Freemasons and share your opinion. Thanks. Blueboar (talk) 12:23, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 April 2013

[edit]

68th London wiki meet

[edit]

Hi, it was a pleasure meeting you. Thank you for the interesting conversation. Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 07:55, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 April 2013

[edit]

Proposal to include David North as Key Trotskyist

[edit]

Could you take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Trotskyism#Proposal_to_include_David_North_as_Key_Trotskyist ? Thanks! --Duncan (talk) 11:54, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 April 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 29 April 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 06 May 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 13 May 2013

[edit]

The Wikimedia UK AGM will be held in June, and nominations for the UK Wikimedian of the Year are currently open. If there is someone who you feel has made an important contribution to the UK Wikimedia movement in the last year please go ahead and nominate them here by 09:00 (BST) on Monday 20th May at the latest. Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 13:01, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 May 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 27 May 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 05 June 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 12 June 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 19 June 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 26 June 2013

[edit]

Hi

[edit]

Blessedbe54 (talk) 13:33, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Cheers

[edit]

This Wiki workshop is so helpful. Cheers Blessedbe54 (talk) 14:14, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Deletion

[edit]

Hi Leutha. The main problem with this page was that it didn't actually appear to be an encyclopaedia article as such, more a list of resources and suggestions. It's the sort of thing you would expect to see on an article talk page (or on a project page, if there is a black music project). A couple of editors had tagged it as original research or lacking in context, and it obviously wasn't actually an article telling us about British Black Music, so I deleted it. I'll post the deleted text here shortly for you to decide where you want to keep it. If you have any questions, feel free to get back to me. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 19:42, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 July 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 10 July 2013

[edit]

The Signpost: 17 July 2013

[edit]

Anglo-Soviet Trade Agreement : evolution along the years ?

[edit]

Hello Lutha ! I am now strolling in early SSSR, &, wondering about this treaty evolution, I asked a question on Ref. Desk before getting the idea to find the author in the § "Article History" . Here is my question, with the only answer I got (as of 3 weeks later) . Thanks BTW for your work, & your User Page looks amazing to me ( while how poor seems mine on WP fr ! But I'm a very late-comer on computers...)

"What became of the Anglo-Soviet Trade Agreement in the '20 an '30 ? Hello Learned Ones ! It seems to me the article Anglo-Soviet Trade Agreement doesn't say how fruitful this agreement has been in the following years; & the blue link n° 1 seems to me to lead into a cul-de-sac...It may not have been very long-lived, since I notice that during the Great Purge, "espionnage for G.B." was frequently the reason for a bullet in the neck. Thanks a lot beforehand for your answers. T.y." Arapaima (talk) 10:22, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

I would guess that most aspects of USSR-UK relations suffered a strong setback after the Zinoviev letter affair... AnonMoos (talk) 03:57, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi, am currently away from home (Haute Savoie yesterday!) and so do not have my references handy. What was particularly of interest to me was how the British got around the lack of recognition of the Soviet regime, by going through the co-op movement. My interest was aroused by a cartoon in Workers Dreadnought which was very much against it. This appeared in the issue just before the conference of the Communist Party (British Section of the Third International), who were largely pro-soviet and anti-bolshevik. The cartoon appeared in a document for the same conference which comprised a draft constitution of the British Soviets, which contained detailed proposals for Poplar (where WD was based, Manchester and South Wales). This was going on at .a time when news of the defeat of the Ruhr Uprising had yet to sink in. I shall add more when I return to London. (any information of parallel events in France would be useful including material around the Occupation_of_the_RhinelandLeutha (talk) 08:43, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 July 2013

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:English slave traders and slave holders, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ...William 18:02, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

William de la Founte

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at William de la Founte shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

The consensus at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 June 20#Category:Slave traders and slave holders was pretty clear, please stop your edit warring - or you might end up with a block. GiantSnowman 18:11, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Comm Int.JPG

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Comm Int.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:24, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2013

[edit]

Blocked

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for repeatedly removing valid categories / adding deleted categories, contrary to CFD consensus. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

GiantSnowman 21:28, 2 August 2013 (UTC)