Jump to content

User:Bellerophon/Tools

This user has autopatrolled rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User page

Go to my user page
Go to my user page

Talk

Click here to goto my talk page, where you can leave a message for me.
Click here to goto my talk page, where you can leave a message for me.

Email

Please do not email me for routine matters! Only email me for matters you do not wish to discuss on-Wiki.
Please do not email me for routine matters! Only email me for matters you do not wish to discuss on-Wiki.

Adoption

Check out my adoption school
Check out my adoption school

Awards

My awards and recognitions
My awards and recognitions

Contribs

Click here to see my contributions to Wikipedia
Click here to see my contributions to Wikipedia

Sandbox

Take a look at my work in progress
Take a look at my work in progress

Tools

Tools
Tools

Edit count

Take a look at my edit count
Take a look at my edit count


3

WikiDefcon 3
Moderate to high level of vandalism

4.28 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot —20:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)


Template:R template index - redirect template index


CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.


Update this page
Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 1
Requests for unblock 87
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 77
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 6
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 6
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 24
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 1
Candidates for speedy deletion 39
Open sockpuppet investigations 22
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

AB = Administrative Backlogs

[edit]

Administrative backlog

[edit]
Requested RD1 redactions
Requests for unblock
SPI cases awaiting administration
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests
Wikipedia pages tagged for copyright problems
Wikipedia:Closure requests
Wikipedia:Copyright problems
Template:Did you know/Queue
Template:DYK queue/backlog
Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion
Wikipedia:Requested moves
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/AutoWikiBrowser
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer
MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist
Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge
Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies/Requests

WP:AIV

[edit]

AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism

Administrator intervention against vandalism

Reports

[edit]

Bot-reported

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]


CSD / PRODs

[edit]

CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 2
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 2
Importance or significance not asserted 0
Other candidates 37

The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )

Deletion backlog

{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat

BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 2 items

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 4 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 1 item

Requested RD1 redactions – 48 items

Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

[edit]

UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection

Usernames for administrator attention

Bot-reported

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

[edit]
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Shortcuts

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Yukio Mishima

[edit]

Reason: There has been repeated instances of IP user (45.128.80.181, 85.203.211.66, 186.127.131.161, 2001:4455:1B1:2800:F880:F193:DDDA:4AF2 etc.) editing original research and destroying accurate corrections. it's probably the same person trolling. みしまるもも (talk) 12:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Ahmed Al-Kaf

[edit]

Reason: His page has had a long history of being vandalized, and now that it's unprotected again, it's still being vandalized. I'm sorry if I seem mad, I'm just genuinely fed up with people vandalizing this poor guy's wiki page. Thank you for understanding. OpalYosutebito (talk) 14:55, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:31, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Jonathan Mingo

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. LaffyTaffer (talk) 15:18, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Nissan Cherry

[edit]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandals have taken to making many nonsense edits on new accounts to bypass semi-protection. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Snakemaster7114. Kneesalt (talk) 15:38, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Dov Lior

[edit]

Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. A highly contentious BLP within scope of the WP:ARBECR that appears to be being edited mostly by IPs, non-EC accounts and checkuser blocked sockpuppets. Sean.hoyland (talk) 15:52, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Done. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:01, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Claudia De la Cruz

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. User:Namiba 17:12, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Chetsford (talk) 17:48, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Lazar Tasic

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page was a redirect, and a specific person keeps adding unsourced content, in Bosnian, that appears to either be wholly untrue or which belongs in the article to which this page used to redirect. AriTheHorseTalk to me! 18:56, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

User talk:98.188.150.203

[edit]

Temporary full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Violations of WP:NPA on blocked user's talk page. TheWikipede (talk) 19:08, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed by Ad Orientem. Favonian (talk) 19:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

[edit]
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Shortcuts

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Shortcuts

Talk:Mohammed Deif

[edit]

Unprotect: The talk page was recently semi-protected due to unregistered users using the talk page as WP:FORUM on Mohammed Deif's death. At the time, his death was in dispute. Now that his death is no longer in dispute, and the article shows him as dead, I don't think the talk page needs to be semi-protected any more. The Mountain of Eden (talk) 05:23, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

@Daniel Case: Any thougths on that request? Lectonar (talk) 12:10, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
Update: the death is still in dispute. Hamas has disputed the report that it has acknowledged the death. For now, it seems that the consensus is to have the article show that he is dead, and note the dispute. Since the WP:FORUM comments were from the side that wanted to have the article show Deif as dead, I don't expect this activity to resume. I also don't expect it to now come from the other side.
Please note that semi-protecting the talk page means that non-confirmed editors cannot make edit requests. This means that protection on talk pages should be applied only under the most extreme circumstances. The Mountain of Eden (talk) 17:00, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
So do we want to lift the protection or not? Daniel Case (talk) 03:37, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Meitei language

[edit]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because it is not vandalized and was not being vandalized by unregistered users, I don't think the protection was necessary and should be lowered to either semi-protected or unprotected. ミラへぜ (talk) 15:25, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

@ミラへぜ: The reason given for protection was Arbitration enforcement, most likely India-Pakistan. While this protection is over a year old at this point, you should have asked Courcelles (talk · contribs) if they'd be willing to unprotect first. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:14, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

[edit]
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Shortcut

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


Gaza genocide

[edit]

My suggestion is to leave out the following 2 sentences in the "German complicity" paragraph as they seem to be based on misunderstandings:

"She also highlighted police suppression of pro-Palestine protests throughout Germany[509] as evidence of state complicity.[508] Karen Wells et al. highlight how Germany has entrenched its complicity in Israel's actions by banning use of the word "genocide" in reference to Israel.[471][better source needed]"

1. In general violent protests are not allowed in Germany. As some of the first pro-Palestine protests were violent, they were sometimes forbidden by courts, if they were expected to turn violent. But that is common policy in Gemany with all subjects and not special for pro-Palestine protests.

Meanwhile, there even is a calendar concerning pro-Palestinian protests[8] with daily up to 20 protests all over Germany. Thus, there is no general police suppression of pro-Palestine protests as is suggested by the current wording.

2. The word “genocide” is not banned in reference to Israel in Germany - maybe that was a misunderstanding: What is not allowed in Germany is to call for genocide against Jews. The slogan “From the river to the sea” is seen as such call and banned. Gilbert04 (talk) 15:34, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

@FortunateSons: A quick browse shows at least for the first part support for removal, can you add any additional incite? -- Cdjp1 (talk) 12:38, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
I can confirm that both statements are broadly true. IMO, the best resource for this discussion (in the contemporary context) is probably Steinberg: Versammlungsfreiheit nach dem 7. Oktober - NVwZ 2024, 302. Direct citation: “Die Subsumtion unter diesen Tatbestand bereitet aber auch sonst Probleme. Die Stadt Frankfurt a. M. hatte dem Anmelder einer Versammlung „Frieden in Nahost" am 2.12.2023 untersagt, während der Versammlung zur Vernichtung Israels aufzurufen, dem Staat Israel das Existenzrecht abzusprechen, sowie die Aussagen „Israel Kindermörder", „Juden Kindermörder", „Israel bringt Kinder um" sowie „From the river to the sea" zu tätigen. Diese Beschränkungen hob das VG Frankfurt vollständig auf. Auf die Beschwerde der Stadt differenzierte der VGH Kassel Aufrufe zur Vernichtung Israels verstießen - wie gesagt - gegen § 111 StGB und die Aussage „Juden Kindermörder" erfülle den Tatbestand der Volksverhetzung (§ 130 StGB). Demgegenüber wurden andere Außerungen wie „Kindermörder Israel" oder die Bezeichnung der israelischen Militäroperationen in Gaza als „Genozid" nicht beanstandet und die Entscheidung des VG insoweit aufrechterhalten. Es sei davon auszugehen, dass bei den militärischen Verteidigungshandlungen Israels auch Kinder zu Schaden kämen. Eine solche laienhafte Zuspitzung sei im Rahmen der Meinungsfreiheit hinzunehmen. Anders hatte der VGH Mannheim am 21.10.2023 ein Verbot der Parole „Israel Kindermörder" und „Israel bringt Kinder um" durch die Versammlungsbehörde trotz bestehender Zweifel über deren Strafbarkeit aufrechterhalten; im Verfahren des vorläufigen Rechtsschutzes sei nur eine summarische Prüfung möglich; eine einmal getätigte Äußerung könne nicht rückgängig gemacht werden. Die Unterscheidung zwischen antisemitisch und antiisraelisch stellt sicherlich eine Gratwanderung dar, die hier im Einzelnen nicht beschrieben werden kann“autotranslated: “However, the subsumption under this offense also causes other problems. On December 2, 2023, the city of Frankfurt am Main had prohibited the person registering a meeting "Peace in the Middle East" from calling for the destruction of Israel during the meeting, from denying the State of Israel the right to exist, and from making the statements "Israel, child murderer," "Jews, child murderer," "Israel kills children" and "From the river to the sea." The Administrative Court of Frankfurt completely lifted these restrictions. In response to the city's complaint, the Administrative Court of Kassel differentiated that calls for the destruction of Israel violated - as mentioned - Section 111 of the Criminal Code and that the statement "Jews, child murderer" constituted incitement to hatred (Section 130 of the Criminal Code). In contrast, other statements such as "Israel, child murderer" or the description of Israeli military operations in Gaza as "genocide" were not objected to and the Administrative Court's decision was upheld in this respect. It can be assumed that children would also be harmed in Israel's military defense actions. Such a lay exaggeration must be accepted within the framework of freedom of expression. On October 21, 2023, the Mannheim Higher Administrative Court upheld a ban on the slogans "Israel, child murderer" and "Israel kills children" by the assembly authority despite existing doubts about their criminal liability; in the interim legal protection procedure, only a summary examination is possible; a statement once made cannot be reversed. The distinction between anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli is certainly a balancing act that cannot be described in detail here.” There is no broad ban on pro-Palestinian protests either, and they were even allowed to happen on Oct. 7 of this year (in some cases). While there are legal disputes on specifics for both, I’m pretty confident that no reasonable person would disagree with “broadly permitted” regarding both claims. FortunateSons (talk) 16:54, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Bonus: there can be cases where something isn’t criminal, but can be restricted in other ways, for example due to different burdens of proof or social pressures. FortunateSons (talk) 17:11, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
I've removed #2. But there does seem to be evidence that pro-Palestine protests have been banned in parts of Germany at times.[9][10][11].VR (Please ping on reply) 14:55, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Thank you. Maybe the following article gives a bit more clarity.[[12]] Gilbert04 (talk) 18:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately that source seems incomplete. Germany has indeed suppressed peaceful criticism of Israel.[13] And Washington Post says "A planned photo exhibit in southwestern Germany was canceled as a result of social media posts by its curator, including one describing “genocide” in Gaza."[14] VR (Please ping on reply) 22:32, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Well, I do not think that any source will ever be complete. Let me add two more.[[15]][[16]] Gilbert04 (talk) 20:44, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Gaza genocide 2

[edit]

Consider changing "The Israeli government rejected South Africa's allegations, and accused the court of being antisemitic, which it often does when criticised" to "The Israeli government has been accused of consistently weaponizing antisemitism against it's critics, including in the ICJ ruling." Ecco2kstan (talk) 23:12, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

The Weaponization of antisemitism page hyperlinked over "often done" has many sources to draw from regarding the accusations' consistency and nature.
My main concern with the original text is that it's voiced as if it's an observation made by a Wikipedian. The benefit here is that the weaponization of antisemitism has a clearer consistency grounded outside of Wikipedia. Perhaps other ways to word this out include adding a time scale (increasingly accused since Oct. 7th) or specifying the critique (against critiques of their actions since Oct 7th).
If a lead paragraph change is necessary, there may be reason to outline Israeli motives and conditions for the genocide, including Zionism and anti-Arab racism. Ecco2kstan (talk) 23:25, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
@Ecco2kstan, how about: "The Israeli government rejected South Africa's allegations. Supporters of Israel say that accusing Israel of genocide is both antisemitic[17][18] and a form of Holocaust erasure[19], but others argue antisemitism shouldn't be exploited to shield Israel from such allegations.[20][21][22][23]".VR (Please ping on reply) 00:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
I'm not as familiar with the Holocaust erasure claims, but I'm happy with that reworking! If that weaponization of Holocaust denial detail isn't on the weaponization of antisemitism page already, it might be a worthwhile phenomenon incorporate if there's more citations you can find. I might look into it myself. Thanks! Ecco2kstan (talk) 03:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
That does sound quite balanced. +1 from me. Neutral Editor 645 (talk) 18:02, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
@Vice regent: Would you please make this change, so we can close this request? ~Anachronist (talk) 21:28, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
The text I originally wanted modified was changed to "Israel's supporters say that accusing Israel of genocide is antisemitic, but others argue antisemitism should not be exploited to shield Israel from such allegations" after other discussions on the talk page. I almost like it better, but by saying "Israel's supporters" it relieves some of the responsibility from the Israeli government in the accusations that was, to an extent, duly credited in the original modification. Maybe now, it should just say "The Israeli government and their supporters say that accusing the state for genocide antisemitic..." or something similar. Ecco2kstan (talk) 17:39, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Israel–Hamas war

[edit]

Stated Israeli tank losses in casualty and losses infobox are incorrect, attributed article from Business Insider states "The IDF again had problems with anti-tank missiles during the 2006 war in Lebanon, when Hezbollah employed Russian-made Kornets. Though about 50 Merkavas were damaged, only five were destroyed, according to the IDF, which also struggled with poorly maintained vehicles and ill-trained crews." Casualties and losses box states this number as if it was from current conflict. Article does, however, state that "Israel has lost nearly two dozen tanks during fighting with Hamas since October 7." I believe losses of tanks in the infobox should be fixed to reflect this. 155.225.2.98 (talk) 14:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Module:Sandbox/பொதுஉதவி/doc

[edit]

Please help me in creating the page Module:Sandbox/பொதுஉதவி/doc. Thank you. பொதுஉதவி (talk) 04:29, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

I wonder if you've gone to the wrong place. Do you simply want to create a sandbox for yourself? I'm pretty sure Module:Sandbox/பொதுஉதவி/doc would be a documentation page (something listing technical instructions) for the "பொதுஉதவி" page on a kind of multi-use page called "Module:Sandbox". If you're familiar with all this, and you have good reason for creating a module subpage doc page at this title, please just give confirmation. Nyttend (talk) 18:47, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Nair

[edit]

In Diet section, "Pork was noted as a favourite food of the Nair,[78] and even high-status Nairs were noted as eating buffalo meat.[79] The Nair avoided beef, and many did not eat lamb.[80] In the modern day, alcohol is a component of Nair-dominated festivals in Kerala.[79]" These sentences are absolutely controversial, as most of the nairs are vegetarians, and the given statements are baseless. 103.177.252.111 (talk) 12:24, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Do you notice the numbers in square brackets above? Each of those is a reference to a source that should corroborate the claim made, and all three of those references are to what appear to be scholarly works (one research paper and two published books). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Handled requests

[edit]
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
Protected edit requests

13 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:In string (request) 2024-09-03 23:19 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
MediaWiki:Cascadeprotected (request) 2024-10-08 20:04 MediaWiki page (log)
MediaWiki:Noarticletext-nopermission (request) 2024-10-08 20:04 MediaWiki page (log)
MediaWiki:Protectedpagetext (request) 2024-10-08 20:04 MediaWiki page (log)
MediaWiki:Titleblacklist-custom-editnotice (request) 2024-10-08 20:04 MediaWiki page (log)
Template:Editnotice load (request) 2024-10-08 20:04 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
Template:Editnotice load/notext (request) 2024-10-08 20:04 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
Template:Editnotice/notice (request) 2024-10-08 20:04 Template-protected (log) Modified by Callanecc on 2014-02-14: "Highly visible template: and included in a high-risk template"
Template:Editnotices/Group/Template:Editnotices (request) 2024-10-08 20:04 Title blacklist (log) Matching line: Template:Editnotices\/.* <noedit|errmsg=titleblacklist-custom-editnotice>
MediaWiki:Titleblacklist (request) 2024-10-09 18:48 MediaWiki page (log)
MediaWiki:Bad image list (request) 2024-10-29 04:22 MediaWiki page (log) Protected by Redwolf24 on 2005-10-23: "Like all pages in the MediaWiki: space"
Module:Separated entries (request) 2024-10-29 12:19 Fully protected (log) Modified by Amorymeltzer on 2018-12-17: "High-risk Lua module: Over 2M transclusions"
User:AmandaNP/UAA/Similar (request) 2024-11-02 08:11 Fully protected (log) From User:DeltaQuad/UAA/Similar: Protected by AmandaNP on 2011-05-31: "User request within own user space"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 18:24, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
6 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Module:Lang-zh (request) 2024-10-10 09:41 Template-protected (log) From Module:Zh: Protected by HJ Mitchell on 2014-05-03: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Coat of arms (request) 2024-10-30 09:36 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2020-08-29: "High-risk template"
Template:House completed by year category (request) 2024-11-05 11:41 Template-protected (log) From Template:HouseCompletedYr: Protected by BrownHairedGirl on 2019-09-28: "Highly visible template: Over 500 categories are wholly dependent on this template"
Template:As of (request) 2024-11-05 18:25 Template-protected (log) Modified by Fuhghettaboutit on 2013-11-02: "Enable access by template editors"
Template:Canada province decade category (request) 2024-11-05 18:40 Template-protected (log) From Template:DecadecatCanadaprovince: Protected by BrownHairedGirl on 2019-09-28: "Highly visible template: Over 170 categories are wholly dependent on this template"
Template:Canada province decade category/core (request) 2024-11-05 18:46 Template-protected (log) From Template:DecadecatCanadaprovince/core: Protected by BrownHairedGirl on 2019-09-28: "Highly visible template: Over 170 categories are wholly dependent on this template"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 19:56, 5 November 2024 (UTC)


WP:RFA

[edit]

RFA= Requests for adminship

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
Voorts 130 10 3 93 21:06, 8 November 2024 3 days, 0 hoursno report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

Last updated by cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online at 20:06, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

WP:RFP

[edit]

RFP= Requests for permissions

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Davidindia

[edit]

Davidindia (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) He has created a remarkable total of 647 articles on English Wikipedia, with only 4 deletions. This impressive accomplishment highlights his expertise and dedication. Primarily, he focuses on biographies of sportspersons and politicians, demonstrating a strong understanding of these subjects. Additionally, he treats fellow editors with respect and professionalism. Thank you! Jannatulbaqi (talk) 14:23, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Though all the articles they have created cover notable subjects, almost all of them are missing a talk page, which are then created by NPPs. Some older articles are missing default sort, DMY formatting and very short articles do not need multiple sections; rather, they should be consolidated into a single Life or Career section. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:00, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

User:AxonsArachnida

[edit]

They have created 545 clean articles, none of which have been deleted. Their creations focus on spider species articles, so I believe their articles no longer need to go through NPP review. Thanks. GrabUp - Talk 06:30, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Currently created 631 articles, with 86 more added since this nomination. No single one was deleted. GrabUp - Talk 08:29, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
 Done, no issues seen. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 19:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Requests for confirmation


Confirmed

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:1255979u

[edit]

Hey, I would like to be confirmed as I am engaging in multiple editing already, and would like to further the discussion I have started under the UC Berkeley post. I have been providing edit on the page which has been recognized, but right now the semi-protection posed on the Berkeley wiki has stopped me from editing the post. I've done a few editings with IP address too, without recognizing the need of logging in. Thanks! 1255979u (talk) 00:57, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

 Not done autoconfirmed only takes an account age of four days and ten edits. You are already halfway there at five edits. Dr vulpes (Talk) 03:21, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag.

File mover

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Requests for page mover

Page mover

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


User:Toadspike

[edit]

I'd like to be able to take care of technical requests like the one I just posted [24], instead of having to wait for someone else to do them. I've participated in several move discussions and even closed a few – having this userright would also make it easier to close RMs. As far as I can see, all of my technical requests have been performed, and none of my RM closes have been contested. Toadspike [Talk] 11:42, 3 November 2024 (UTC) Toadspike [Talk] 11:42, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

 Done for a three-month trial; feel free to re-request a week or two before it expires. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:32, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Requests for pending changes reviewer


Pending changes reviewer

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:BittersweetParadox

[edit]

I would like to help contribute to the Wikipedia community and help reviews happen quicker. I am passionate about unbiased true information being presented and I think this would be a good privilege for me. BittersweetParadox (talk) 07:41, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

User:TyphoonAmpil

[edit]

I've been patrolling Recent Changes since August 28, 2024, and I helping to review pending changes. Thanks. Ampil (Ταικ • Cοnτribυτιοns) 02:25, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([25]). — MusikBot talk 02:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Wikibear47

[edit]

The pending changes reviewer will help me improve my ability to combat vandalism on Wikipedia. I have a good understanding of the relevant policies. Wikibear47 (talk) 13:55, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

 Done Dr vulpes (Talk) 03:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

User:Edasf

[edit]

Expand my works on Wikipedia.I want to counter vandalism and help Wikipedia by reviewing pending changes fastily and correctly. I have read all guidelines and policy I have also created some articles.Edasf (talk) 16:35, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Avishai11

[edit]

I love helping with new edits and making sure they are 100% correct and appropriate! I would love to help even more with this permission. Avishai11 (talk) 20:46, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Mims Mentor

[edit]

Hello, I am requesting Pending Changes Reviewer rights. I have been an active contributor to Wikipedia for over 5 years, with a strong focus on editing and combating vandalism. I am now keen to broaden my role by helping to review newly created articles, ensuring they meet Wikipedia's standards to qualify as stand-alone pages.--— MimsMENTOR talk 17:24, 3 November 2024 (UTC) — MimsMENTOR talk 17:24, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

 Done Dr vulpes (Talk) 07:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
@Mims Mentor I've granted you this permission for 60 days. I fully believe that you can do this as you have a long record of edits. I was just a little concerned about the number of edits you have. Keep in mind this is not a reflection on you, I've been an administrator for less than a day so I may be mistaken and could just be overly cautious. After the trial period if you still want to keep this permission feel free to come back and request it here. Ping me and I'll review your request as soon as I'm able. If you run into any problems or issues feel free to leave me a note on my talk page. Dr vulpes (Talk) 07:25, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

User:MSLQr

[edit]

Being a recent changes patroller for a while, I am already well aware of the content polices concerned with NPOV, NOR, BLPs and CV. I have also been using Twinkle and AntiVandal tools for a while to combat especially vandalism and unsourced changes to articles. I've read about the feature and the guidelines regarding reviewing process. I think my editing history is enough to meet the criteria making me applicable to review the pending changes. MSLQr (talk) 18:32, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

 Done Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:12, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

User:QEnigma

[edit]

I have been patrolling recent changes and reverting vandalism for some time. In addition, I have contributed to Wikipedia by creating new articles and improving existing ones.

During my recent changes patrol, I have often encountered articles with a "pending review" tag. I would like to assist by accepting constructive edits that are supported by verifiable sources, or by declining edits that do not meet criteria. I would be obliged if I could be granted "Pending changes reviewer" rights to support this work. Thank you. QEnigma (talk) 04:29, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

 Done Dr vulpes (Talk) 05:54, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Requests for rollback


Rollback

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:TheWikipede

[edit]

I would like to have Rollback access to use Huggle and so I can revert vandalism more easily and efficiently. TheWikipede (talk) 17:56, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 35 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 19:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
 Not done Please see the notice at the top of this page; with only 35 edits to the mainspace, I don't think you have the necessary editing experience for advanced permissions. Take a moment to check out CVUA, and if you decide you'd like to get involved, you can enroll at the Counter Vandalism Academy to learn more. Thanks, Fastily 20:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

User:Rasteem

[edit]

I respectfully request Rollback access to facilitate the use of Huggle, which will allow me to promptly and efficiently revert vandalism. I've been monitoring Recent Changes for the past 2-3 months, reverting disruptive edits.

I'm familiar with some Wikipedia policies, including: Reporting repeated vandals after 4 talk page warnings at WP:AIV, reporting reporting sock puppet accounts at WP:SPI and following the 3-revert rule (WP:3RR). And also I'm familiar with the use of Twinkle. ®asteem Talk 20:32, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits. Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make (especially when reverting good faith edits). Are you aware of tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet which make this extremely easy? -Fastily 21:32, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Fastily, I'm already using Twinkle. I've warned many users for vandalism, but I don't warn new users who have made only one edit, as per "Back Biting" guideline. Instead, I typically warn a user after their second vandalism attempt. But in future I'll consider warning users even after one non-constructive edit. ®asteem Talk 21:47, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
No, that is incorrect. You need to be leaving notifications (or warnings) for every revert, regardless of how many edits the user has made or whether this is the user's first instance of vandalism. -Fastily 01:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
{{Done}} I'll always leave a warning notice on their talk page without digging into their number of edits. ®asteem Talk ®asteem Talk 01:54, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Great, could you please now go do some RC patrol in which you demonstrate how you will always be notifying all editors when you revert their edits? Also please don't use {{Done}} or {{Not done}} in your replies to me; on this page at least, these are for admin use only. -Fastily 02:36, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Sure, I'll do RC patrol & will always notify users when I revert their changes. I sincerely apologize for using {done} or {not done} previously. ®asteem Talk 03:17, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

User:MersmanD

[edit]

I would like rollback right because: 1. I am a Recent Changes Patroller, who knows what is considered vandalism 2. Because when multiple occurrences of vandalism is occuring I have to go 1 by 1 and that can take time to revert all the vandalism. 3. I also just think it would help me fight vandalism in general. Thank you for any consideration. MersmanD (talk) 01:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 19 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 01:40, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
 Not done Please see the notice at the top of this page; with only 19 edits to the mainspace, I don't think you have the necessary editing experience for advanced permissions. Take a moment to check out CVUA, and if you decide you'd like to get involved, you can enroll at the Counter Vandalism Academy to learn more. Also this was grossly inappropriate, do not do this again. Fastily 02:36, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, if you were referring to the edit count, it was all in one space and I was trying to delete a point and accidentally deleted the number and the 100 was merged into the text below, in this case the edit count. Sorry for the edit I made, I will be more careful next time. MersmanD (talk) 02:42, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
I will be more careful with my edits in the future, especially with formatting. MersmanD (talk) 02:52, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Requests for template editor

Template editor

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Hilst

[edit]

I'm requesting template editor rights so that I can perform template mergers more easily (like the one me and Rjjiii completed over at {{Archive}}) and for moving prep areas to queues at DYK. – 🌻 Hilst (talk | contribs) 21:12, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Standard Guidelines review:
  1. Green tickY (guideline: >1 year, applicant: ~3)
  2. Green tickY (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~20.5k)
  3. Green tickY (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: ~600)
  4. Green tickY (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: NA)
  5. Red XN (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: 2)
  6. Red XN (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: 3)
Primefac (talk) 21:59, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Footer

[edit]

Policies and links

    My Tools

    [edit]

    ACC stuff

    [edit]

    AfC stuff

    [edit]
    [edit]
    • Replace the text with one of the following:

      {{subst:copyvio|url=insert URL here}}

      {{subst:copyvio|identify non-web source here}}

    • Go to today's section and add

      * {{subst:article-cv|PageName}} from [insert URL or identify non-web source here] ~~~~

      to the bottom of the list. Put the page's name in place of "PageName". If you do not have a URL, enter a description of the source. (This text can be copied from the top of the template after substituting it and the page name and url will be filled for you)
    • Advise the contributor of the material at their talk page. The template on the now blanked page supplies a notice you may use for that purpose.

    {{subst:cclean|url=}}

    Adoption stuff

    [edit]

    Anti-vandal stuff

    [edit]

    Special pages

    [edit]

    Quick templates

    [edit]
    • {{subst:ANI-notice}}
    • {{GOCE|user=Bellerophon|date=}}

    Sister projects

    [edit]

    Wikipedia is written by volunteer editors and hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization that also hosts a range of other volunteer projects:

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Bellerophon/Tools&oldid=712828272"