Talk:Workers' Communist Party (Norway)

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Political parties

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Several of those named as members of AKP were in fact not members of the party, but members of the various youth groups etc. I changed the text accordingly.

Mainstream?

The leftmost in MAINSTREAM politics? AKP was hardly mainstream...--Oddeivind (talk) 04:45, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retarded

This article is just fucking retarded, no more, no less. One of the worst local journalism-pieces I've ever read on wiki...

Sino-Albanian split

Hum, just wondering.. What direction did AKP(m-l) take in the Sino-Albanian split? OF(ml) and EIK(m-l) both followed Albania. KAP followed China with the people following Albania forming their own organisation. What SKP did I don't know.. neither the norwegian, swedish nor english article about SKP mentions their path in the Sino-Albanian split. The reason I find this interesting is that the Faero islands and Iceland are western nordic countries, with western nordic languages and culture while Norway, a country that used to be western nordic now is more eastern nordic in a lot of ways. So perhaps if both SKP and AKP(m-l) followed china it could perhaps be another indication of the possible differences in thinking forming in the nordic countries.. With western nordic countries on one side and the eastern nordic ones on the other. If SKP followed china but not AKP(m-l).. well, perhaps Norwegians and Icelandic people ain't as different as they might seam after all. If SKP followed Albania and AKP(m-l) followed china.. well.. Who knows, the nordic countries are closely related at any rate.. Perhaps there's no significance at all in what path the various organizations decided to follow.. Still, I can't help being curious.. Luredreier 16:25, 3 January 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Luredreier (talk • contribs)