Talk:W. M. Keck Observatory

Astronomy Mid‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

University of California High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to University of California, its history, accomplishments and other topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject University of CaliforniaUniversity of California articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This page is within the scope of the UC Los Angeles task force. New members are always welcome!
	This page is within the scope of the UC Santa Cruz task force. New members are always welcome!

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per discussion below. -GTBacchus^(talk) 01:27, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keck telescopes → W. M. Keck Observatory — The formal name for the observatory should be used for the article title. Dr. Submillimeter 14:26, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Add # '''Support''' or # '''Oppose''' on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.

Survey - in support of the move

Support - Dr. Submillimeter 14:27, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Formal name wins. Recury 20:56, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. -- Coneslayer 14:39, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. — (As a side-note, Mauna Kea Observatory should be moved to Mauna Kea Observatories, because they are "an independent collection" of astronomical observatories, including the W. M. Keck Observatory.)--Endroit 04:57, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey - in opposition to the move

Discussion

Add any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

WikiProject University of California

Several editors are organizing a WikiProject to better organize articles related to the University of California. A preliminary draft is available UCSC=yes|UCSC-importance=|here. You are invited to participate in the discussion at Talk:University of California#Developing Wikiproject University of California. szyslak 22:01, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gobbledygook

There are several sections in the article that are very heavy on "science jargon" and do not explain the information provided in a way that is digestible for a layperson, such as the section on interferometry imaging and so on. The article would be improved by expanding and explaining what this means, in plain English. LennyValentin (talk) 06:12, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Images from Keck Observatory

Any location that has the images taken by the Keck Observatory especially any from the our moon ? Even the Near Infrared "...so sensitive it could detect the equivalent of a single candle flame on the Moon." --79.168.10.241 (talk) 04:27, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keck II laser

I was unable to locate confirmation that laser-guiding was added to Keck I; the Instruments section states it was expected in 2009. Needs update.Twang (talk) 09:51, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The location is incorrect

The red dot that is supposed to be on the map is over the text to the left. I don't know how to fix it though. 87.116.180.11 (talk) 23:06, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on W. M. Keck Observatory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110704072607/http://202.127.29.4/bdep_meeting/download/talks/20July/4-AHoward.ppt to http://202.127.29.4/bdep_meeting/download/talks/20July/4-AHoward.ppt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:03, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]