Talk:Twinkle (protein)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2018 and 7 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jmarcellus713, Ks7n, Daniel.Knorp, Rma3t-mtsu, Mona Kanakrieh.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 11:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Subject clarity

"In most cases, PEO occurs due to a sporadic deletion or duplication within the mitochondrial DNA.[5] However, transmission from the mother to the progeny appears only in few cases. Both autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive inheritance can occur," Mitochondrial DNA is not passed down in a Mendelian manner. An earlier statement links CPEO to TWINKLE, which is not mitochondrial. Also, something needs to be added to explain why there are few cases of being passed from mother to child when that is the pathway that mitochondrial DNA is passed down. In short, the section on genetics reads as if someone typed in "CPEO" into PubMed and chose a sentence from the abstract of several different papers without actually trying to organize their presentation. - Not a sentient octopus — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.220.15.42 (talk) 12:40, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

citation redundancy

I just believe that some of the sources need to be taken out. I think editors generated the citations as new ones instead of looking for citations that were already in use. Plus, some information was repeated in different sections of the article. Two options can be done: either delete the information if it does not belong to the section or when repeated for the second time; another option is to talk about it more when it is repeated; for example, if a function was mentioned in the Discovery section, then it is repeated in the Function section, it should be reintroduced with more details. Rma3t-mtsu (talk) 06:31, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

It looks like you have a good start on your article. I see that it is a fairly new and there is not a lot of information on "Twinkle" yet, so you have a lot of room to play. Good luck, and check out the University Library to find good peer-reviewed articles you could use as sources. Elp3h.emily.powell (talk) 02:03, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]