Talk:The Thin Red Line (novel)

Novels Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	World War II task force

Anti-war Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anti-war, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the anti-war movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anti-warWikipedia:WikiProject Anti-warTemplate:WikiProject Anti-warAnti-war articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

bad original research

how are we supposed to reconcile the CLAIM that "The novel depicts, but is CAREFUL NOT TO JUDGE, acts most readers would consider repellant" with the statement that "the characters who seem to possess those traits that would normally be equated with soldierly virtue are shown to be brutal and inhumane" ??????

clearly an implied judgment runs throughout the book, along the lines of whether the events within it are good or bad. it would seem as though only an apologist for mass butchery could say that this book doesn't actually carry any clear judgment of the ravages it depicts.

clean-up!

This article needs to be cleaned up. The english is not to good.

To me this is simply a shoddy book report someone did for and English class or something. It is someone's opinion essentially. Needs to be more than cleaned up. I'll try to look for a more objective description and format it like other books. --Tainter 03:15, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not only is the English not too good, but this "article" is simply the not too well-formed criticism of the book. Better to delete than simply clean up. This work was important enough to bring MAllick out of essentially a quarter century of retirment from cinema, and this is the best Wiki can do?Reimelt 01:16, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Come on guys, there's nothing wrong with the English! Maybe more information and a restructure to make it similar to other books entries would be appropriate though. WRT Mallick, I don't think the article needs to focus on his movie; I get the impression Mallick just used the book as a convenient scenario to hang his ideas from. The film is a classic, but its only resemblance to the book is in some of the characters' names and in the setting.

maybe mention that the book is on a lot of Top 100 (even Top 10!) lists for 20th century fiction?

Hopefully this is now a bit more readable - I don't, however, know enough about the novel to add more content. Septemberfourth476 (talk) 18:19, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lit. significance and criticism

This section needs a lot of work (the whole article does, actually). It should be used to present summary reviews of the novel, evidence of its literary and/or historical impact (not Wikipedia editor's lit crit review), etc. Sources should be included to published reviews; for instance, the quote from Christian Science Monitor comparing TTRL to Red Badge of Courage is all over the web. But it would be more useful to provide the actual original source. Alcarillo 18:15, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Title

Can anyone confirm, did the midwestern proverb of the thin red line between sanity and insanity actually exist? I believe James Jones invented it, as it sounds too abstract, literal and conceptual to be a folksy, commonly used old saying.--Ukas (talk) 10:47, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Thin Red Line is an expression used to refer to The British Army, as the British always used to wear red. As it says in the article, Jones took it from a Kipling poem. So, I've always thought it rather bizarre that it's used to refer to the Americans in this book & film.VenomousConcept (talk) 10:05, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Thin red line book cover.jpg

Image:Thin red line book cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Criticism

Can we improve the criticism section, I found a link to that citation but the link to the article was dead. Wrathofjames (talk) 07:23, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Thin Red Line (novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110807131652/http://www.jamesjonesliterarysociety.org/THIN.HTM to http://www.jamesjonesliterarysociety.org/THIN.HTM

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:53, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]