Talk:The Monkey and the Cat
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]When was this written? Why is it notable? RJFJR (talk) 15:40, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
It is notable because it is a well-known fable, and it touches on greed, psychology, and morals. Many a time have humans exploited each other for various purposes. -24.131.169.195 (talk) 13:05, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- Notability, for Wikipedia's purposes, should be defined in terms of WP:NOTABILITY. If it's "well-known" it should be quantified in some regard and referenced that it is. Barkeep Chat | $ 13:29, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
New version
[edit]One hopes that the rewrite will lay to rest the doubts expressed above and the concern shown by an administrator last year that the article lacks credible references. It would be nice if the article could now be upgraded from Stub class. Mzilikazi1939 (talk) 23:36, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Monkey and the Cat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121111084331/http://www.archive.org/stream/flowersoffablecu00londiala to http://www.archive.org/stream/flowersoffablecu00londiala#page/340/mode/2up
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:15, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Monkey and the Cat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.archive.org/stream/flowersoffablecu00londiala#page/340/mode/2up
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:36, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Monkey and the Cat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110926212007/http://www.fundp.ac.be/universite/bibliotheques/bump/numerisation/livres-imprimes/esbatement-moral-amimaux to http://www.fundp.ac.be/universite/bibliotheques/bump/numerisation/livres-imprimes/esbatement-moral-amimaux
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:10, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
deprecated positioning of box
[edit]I'm not sure what it is about the positioning of the box that is deprecated, but if you could elabroate we could probably find a positioning that was not deprecated. ----Pontificalibus 10:28, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- The Manual of Style clearly advises against having illustrations or text boxes opposite each other. However, the other objection to this item is that it does not illustrate anything in the text. It is established there that the fable was known in several countries from the 1500s and commonly mentioned. There seems little point in singling out one of these references for such prominent display when there are already so many. Sweetpool50 (talk) 17:03, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
21st Century
[edit]International short story? 64.226.63.220 (talk) 04:45, 15 May 2023 (UTC)