Talk:Suave (song)

Suave (song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 10, 2023	Good article nominee	Listed

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Latin music: Tropical music Low‑importance

	Latin music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Tropical music task force.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Suave (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 08:24, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I will review this per your request, Erick! --K. Peake 08:24, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

Shouldn't Larrabee be written as Larrabee Sound in the infobox?
"The song was met with positive reactions" → "The song received positive reactions"
Move the award-winning sentence to being the one after the above, also place the music video one after the commercial sentence
"by Kiko Guerrero, filmed in" → "by Kiko Guerrero and filmed in" since the last and is the only one to not use "was"
"Commercially, the track reached" → "Commercially, the song reached"
"Rivera's cover was nominated in" → "The cover was nominated in"

Background and composition

"A 27-second sample of Miguel's "Suave"," → "A 27-second sample of "Suave"," on the audio sample text, also change the title to "Suave"
First para looks good!
Wikilink as cover versions instead
Shouldn't you identify the album by name in the second para?
The dance genre is not sourced
"and its lyrics narrates about a" → "and its lyrics narrate about a"

Promotion and reception

Wouldn't it be more suitable to write that the live version was featured on Miguel's live albums then write the titles?
"listed as the best three songs" → "listed it as the best three songs"
Wikilink VH1
Why is the Notitas Musicales position not mentioned here?
Remove pipe on covered

Track listing

Good

Personnel

Pipe percussion to Percussion instrument
Pipe background vocals to Backing vocalist
Pipe mixing assistant to Audio mixing (recorded music)

Weekly charts

Retitle to Charts

Jerry Rivera version

Infobox looks good!
The 1995 recording year is not sourced
Wikilink funk
"became his first number one song" → "became Rivera's first number one song"

Charts

Good

References

Copyvio score looks respectable at 33.3%!!
Wikilink AllMusic on ref 2 instead of ref 3, also remove Rovi Corporation
Cite GQ as work/website instead on ref 13 with the wikilink
Fix MOS:CAPS issues with ref 18
Wikilink Milenio on ref 22
Pipe Sony Music España to Sony Music on ref 24
Luis Miguel should be author linked on ref 25 instead of ref 26 and format his name in the same way for both to be consistent
WP:OVERLINK of AllMusic on ref 28

Final comments and verdict

On hold until all of the issues are fixed; here is your true New Year's gift! --K. Peake 09:47, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the review! @Franlm14:, can you handle it for me? My only days off work are Sunday and Mondays. Erick (talk) 19:26, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Kyle Peake Alright, I think I got all of them. As usual, let me know if I missed any of them. The only one that confused me was ""by Kiko Guerrero, filmed in" → "by Kiko Guerrero and filmed in" since the last and is the only one to not use "was"". Erick (talk) 15:12, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Magiciandude This point meant that it is the last part of the sentence and does not use was, also you missed changing the audio sample text. --K. Peake 21:40, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Magiciandude ✓ Pass now, I had to re-edit the music video sentence since I meant the part after the comma could be changed because it did not use was. --K. Peake 09:20, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]