Talk:Streamline diffusion

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Streamline diffusion article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Mathematics Low‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

‹See TfM›

Physics: Fluid Dynamics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fluid Dynamics Taskforce.

Untitled section

This article has unfortunately enough been written solely from memory. I searched for good sources, but could not find any. It would be great if someone could provide a good source. Bfg 13:29, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This really does not make sense -- D Laplace Psi is a scalar, |u|=1 => u ( u * D Laplace Psi ) = D Laplace Psi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.13.156.50 (talk) 14:34, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The streamline diffusion is Divergence (u D u . Gradient Psi) but it is not the only mistake in the equation. The sign of the diffusive term is wrong as well. For a reference, it could be interesting to show that the weak form obtained after integration by part correspond to what is in Elman, Silvester, Wathen 2005, Oxford University ("Finite Elements for incompressible flows or something like this") —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.178.186.13 (talk) 19:17, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Context

Could someone please explain what we're talking about here? Is this fluid dynamics? No fair typing random equations out of the book and pretending they are articles. --Wtshymanski (talk) 13:38, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]