Talk:Skendleby
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Skendleby article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reassess - December 2013
[edit]Reassessed from B to C :- B articles would have all general information about place at least partially fleshed in per WP:UKVILLAGES, including enough stuff on History/Government/Geography/Demography/Economy/Culture/Landmarks/Transport/Education/Religion/Sport/Notables, to create reasonably-sized sections, and with infobox, as would eventually be expected for Good/Featured articles, all sourced and with appropriate style for refs. This one doesn't fit the bill. There may never be enough to fill in the necessaries, in which case the article is destined to stay as a lower class. Acabashi (talk) 22:32, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class WikiProject Cities articles
- All WikiProject Cities pages
- C-Class UK geography articles
- Low-importance UK geography articles
- C-Class England-related articles
- Low-importance England-related articles
- WikiProject England pages
- C-Class Lincolnshire articles
- Mid-importance Lincolnshire articles
- WikiProject Lincolnshire articles