Jump to content

Talk:Regional science

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Criticisms

[edit]

These two paragraphs in the Criticisms section appear to be original research and should probably be dropped:

Perhaps part of the decline in interest from practitioners in planning and geography may be due to the rise of geographic information systems and other readily used statistical and modeling software, which have allowed predictive modeling and analysis to be done more efficiently and by non-specialists. In fact, such easy quantification apparently has induced somewhat of a reactionary response among some in academic geography away from the quantitative analysis of human activities as an end in itself — or as a guide to planners or corporations.[citation needed]
The dawning of globalization and the internet age has rendered one core technique of regional science, location theory, less applicable - since a number of social activities require no "optimal spatial location" whatsoever. Then again, the unification of Europe and the increased internationalization of the world's economic, social, and political realms has generated more interest in the study of regional, as opposed to national, phenomena.

Any opinions? Anthon.Eff 19:21, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

original research comment by Anthon.Eff

[edit]

Anton.Eff it looks like something from Trevor Barnes. I added the last sentence merely because this is what motivated Paul Krugman's work in the area and the rest of the stuff on this page at the time was sodown on regional sciennce that I just felt a need to end the whole thing on an upbeat note. As far as I am concerned, however, it could all be struck.

Mikelahr 20:13, 22 March 2006 (UTC)Mikelahr[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Regional science. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:56, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]