Talk:Rasmussen syndrome
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Rasmussen syndrome.
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 21 March 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Rasmussen's encephalitis to Rasmussen syndrome. The result of the discussion was moved. |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Rasmussen's encephalitis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090329081810/http://www.community-news.com:80/node/3302 to http://www.community-news.com/node/3302
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:31, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Requested move 21 March 2024
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Polyamorph (talk) 09:59, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
– This is now the name, following the ILAE, see "International League Against Epilepsy classification and definition of epilepsy syndromes with onset at a variable age: position statement by the ILAE Task Force on Nosology and Definitions", https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.17240 Johnbod at ILAE (talk) 02:28, 21 March 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Natg 19 (talk) 16:55, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Certainly a DuckDuckGo search of Rasmussen syndrome yields the encephalitis overwhelmingly. I added the associated move for the skin condition of the same name. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 01:49, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. The name change is recent (2022), so one would expect the old name to dominate in searches for a while. Johnbod at ILAE (talk) 01:53, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, now that I've had some time to sit and search, that's what I'm seeing.
- DuckDuckGo query for "Rasmussen" "brain" seem to indicate the WP:COMMONNAME is still Rasmussen['s] encephalitis.
- The query for "Rasmussen syndrome" shows the following:
- Sources use both, usually along the lines of Rasmussen's encephalitis (RE) is a rare, chronic neurological disease...It is also called Rasmussen syndrome.
- The primary topic of "Rasmussen syndrome" is definitely the neurological one, not the skin disease.
- Pubmed results from 2019 (so the last five years) for "Rasmussen('s) syndrome" and "Rasmussen('s) encephalitis" are 20 and 146, respectively.
- Those specific PubMed queries show both terms have been used since 1989 or so.
- Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 15:51, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, now that I've had some time to sit and search, that's what I'm seeing.