Talk:Qal3ah
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Here's some quick whois info:
Whois info for, qal3ati.net:
Registrant:
Self Hmdan street abu dhabi, abu dhabi 25852 AE
Domain name: QAL3ATI.NET
Administrative Contact: Qalaah, Qalaah [email protected] Hmdan street abu dhabi, abu dhabi 25852 AE +971.506258852 Technical Contact: Technical, Host Europe [email protected] Portland Street Beeston Nottingham, Nottinghamshire NG9 2LP UK +44 115 9170000 Fax: +44 115 8770213
Registration Service Provider: PIPEX Communications Hosting Ltd, [email protected] +44.115-917-0000 http://www.123-reg.co.uk/ This company may be contacted for domain login/passwords, DNS/Nameserver changes, and general domain support questions.
Registrar of Record: TUCOWS, INC. Record last updated on 24-Nov-2003. Record expires on 17-Sep-2005. Record created on 17-Sep-2003.
Domain servers in listed order: NS1.HOSTWORLD4U.NET 64.246.51.41 NS2.HOSTWORLD4U.NET 64.246.51.42
Domain status: REGISTRAR-LOCK
So, proof they are from the UAE.
Natalinasmpf 7 July 2005 15:17 (UTC)
Natalina! Nice to see you here. But I can't seem to access the any mirriors of this website... I always get a 500 error.
How is a site which is little more than a list of mirrors a "reactionary site"?
It's not a "little more". It attacks the site owner, and other sites...not a mere list. Of course, these allegations probably have some basis, but they are not an NPOV link. -- Natalinasmpf 8 July 2005 13:48 (UTC)
Still, though, "reactionary?"
Seems very inappropriate --Cruci 8 July 2005 20:00 (UTC)
Not really. See, I had suspicions Al-Faqih might not even own the site, and clearly those sites are dedicated to attacking his reputation, whether those attacks have basis or not. Hence, not POV. We label the external links the same for global warming. -- Natalinasmpf 9 July 2005 04:26 (UTC)
Current status
[edit]Does this site still exist? Everything I hear about it comes from 2005. I'm beginning to think this site was only used to co-ordinate the July 7th bombings, and then was discontinued. Xaxafrad 02:31, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- Excuse me, but honestly, when I saw this article I was thinking "does wikipedia have articles on forums as well, now? In that case, there's like a billion other forums to start articles for." I think articles for forums either should not - or should - be included. But I dont think it's really necessary (or encyclopedic). - 84.208.112.195 11:31, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- Well, al-Faqih's forum isn't just any forum. Or rather, it wasn't. It has been shut down by the Law. BTW it had numerous aliases. I'll come back to this. LDH 05:24, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
I've brought the article up to date, and organized the references, deleting the dead references to the forum itself.
Are we sure that SOFIR is Israel-based? I know Haganah has a dot-il URL, but still...
LDH 07:14, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Qal3ah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20050706230322/http://www.treas.gov/press/releases/js2164.htm to http://www.treas.gov/press/releases/js2164.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:34, 21 July 2016 (UTC)