Talk:Pok

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Pok which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 20:50, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

Stop using edit summaries for discussions. "Pok may refer to Pakistan-occupied Kashmir" is a neutral statement on navigation page, because indeed "Pok" may refer to Pakistan-occupied Kashmir as covered by that article. -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:05, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do you disagree with the addition of the addition of a description? Wikipedia does not use terms like "Pakistan-occupied Kashmir" or "Indian-occupied Kashmir" in its own voice – they're only used in quotes or in the discussions of the terms themselves. I think the reasoning here will become a bit more obvious if you consider a somewhat analogous case, say Poof (disambiguation). Of course, "poof" may refer to a homosexual man, but the dab page rightly eschews wordings like Poofs are gay men and instead explicitly states that this is a pejorative term. – Uanfala (talk) 13:32, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]