Talk:Paneth cell

Physiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to the physiology of cells.

Anatomy: Microanatomy Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to microanatomy.

redundency

There's a duplication of a paragraph, that is found both in the introduction and a section called secretions. Where is the right place for that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mifam (talk • contribs) 09:24, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation?

The image of the Paneth cell

appears to be a copyright violation. The same image appears in the Encyclopaedia Britannica website under Paneth cells http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/441200/Paneths-cell#tab=active~checked%2Citems~checked&title=Paneth%E2%80%99s%20cell%20--%20Britannica%20Online%20Encyclopedia, yet the image data here suggests it is the creator's own photo. However, the creator's talk page is dotted with small warnings about appropriate sourcing of images, use of tags etc. Can an admin look into this please?

This message is also posted at the user's talk page and at Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions

Mattopaedia (talk) 23:54, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The image at EB is credited to jpogi and per this, EB "claims no compilation copyright in images or materials that are subject to the GNU Free Documentation License or similar licenses" and "Photographs and illustrations are copyrighted by their respective owners, as noted in the credits." Presuming the two jpogi's are the same, jpogi has released the photo under GFDL. The wiki image has appropriate metadata and is much higher resolution than the EB image. I don't see a problem here. Franamax (talk) 06:58, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL IWAS HE ONE WHO TOOK THAT PICTURE.. DID YOU SEE THE NBAME OF THE CREDITOR FROM THAT SITE? IT SAYS JPOGI LOL I GOT THE ORIGINAL FILE HERE IN MY PC.. I WAS 1STYEAR MEDICAL STUDENT WHEN I TOOK THAT PICTURE FROM MY CLASSMATE'S CAMERA FROM OUR INSTITUTIONS MICROSCOPE.;. THAT WAS 3 YEARS AGO.. sorry for tha caps, im in a hurry.. i forgot to change, got no time to change.. take care my friend

it doesnt mean that when you see a picture from other site, they didnt got from wikipedia..Jpogi (talk) 12:10, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fine then. I've uploaded the image to the Commons. --CopperKettle (talk) 19:06, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copy Editing needed

This page is embarrassing to WP. I will try but wow what a mess.--Akrasia25 (talk) 18:54, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May the "medical citations needed" box be removed?

I believe I have added enough research and medical sources. Is it OK to remove? Irena.Buskova (talk) 11:44, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]