Talk:Otho
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Otho article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wrong coin
[edit]The coin depicted in the article was minted under Nero and shows Nero's portrait. It would be much better to use issues from the mint of Rome rather than Greek drachms to depict the Roman emperors. Because of Otho's short reign there are no Drachms in his name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.5.187.42 (talk) 11:10, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
I was...
[edit]Certain that the population Rome despised Nero.. This article contradicts what I had believed when it says "The population of the city was also unhappy with Galba and cherished the memory of Nero." --- Is this true? Did the Romans like Nero? Why on earth would they miss such a tyrant?
"According to Suetonius and Cassius Dio , the people of Rome celebrated the death of Nero. [137][138] Tacitus, though, describes a more complicated political environment. Tacitus mentions that Nero's death was welcomed by Senators, nobility and the upper-class.[139] The lower-class, slaves, frequenters of the arena and the theater, and "those who were supported by the famous excesses of Nero", on the other hand, were upset with the news.[139] Members of the military were said to have mixed feelings, as they had allegiance to Nero, but were bribed to overthrow him.[104"
Wikipedia page on Nero.
- Also, the Flavian emperors deliberately invoked the memory of Nero to court favor with the Roman crowds, which is further proof that he was popular with the masses, if not the aristocracy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.146.101.146 (talk) 16:17, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Dio Reports
[edit]Dion Cassius reports that Othon said the following words before his death "It is far more just that one should perish for all, than many for one" (Roman History,book LXIII ,13) - added that to the article - Babur (*thanks to whoever added the link for the book)
The name Otho
[edit]I seem to think that the name Otto and all its variants (Ottone, Odo, Odone, Oddo etc) are derived from "Otho". Can anyone confirm this? If so perhaps a merge of all these pages would be appropriate. Zargulon 13:42, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
[Julio]-Claudian Dynasty??
[edit]In the article, he's listed as belonging to the Claudian dynasty. How's this even possible? The Claudian dynasty ended with Nero. Otho was not related by blood or any relation to anybody in the Claudian dynasty. He belonged to the chaotic Year of Four Emperors period, not particularly associated with any dynasty, especially none of them to Claudian. (The last of the "four emperors" founded Flavian dynasty.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.185.227.61 (talk) 10:33, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Otho. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090220184654/http://www.cartage.org.lb/en/themes/booklibrary/books/bibliographie/J/Juvenal/juv-sat2lateng.html to http://www.cartage.org.lb/en/themes/booklibrary/books/bibliographie/J/Juvenal/juv-sat2lateng.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:18, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Bust of Otho
[edit]Are we sure that the bust of Otho in the article is ancient? It looks modern to me. Where is it displayed?
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (military) articles
- Low-importance biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- C-Class biography (royalty) articles
- Low-importance biography (royalty) articles
- Royalty work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Classical Greece and Rome articles
- Mid-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles
- All WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome pages
- C-Class history articles
- Mid-importance history articles
- WikiProject History articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class Roman and Byzantine military history articles
- Roman and Byzantine military history task force articles
- C-Class Classical warfare articles
- Classical warfare task force articles
- C-Class Roman and Byzantine emperors articles
- Top-importance Roman and Byzantine emperors articles
- C-Class LGBTQ+ studies articles
- C-Class WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies - person articles
- WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies - person articles
- WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies articles