Jump to content

Talk:ORP Gen. K. Pułaski

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merger proposal

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was merge . - - mathmitch7 (talk/contribs) 17:57, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article USS Clark (FFG-11) should be merged here. It's about the exact same ship - only serving in a different navy with a different name. Neither article is too long to prevent justifying a merge, on the contrary - both articles are quite short. Even most of the infobox is duplicated in both articles. JIP | Talk 19:27, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support @JIP: This is an uncontroversial merger IMO. Ships in similar situations almost always have a single page with redirect from the other name, and then a single history about the ship. One example of this would be USS Whippoorwill (AMS-207), which RSS Jupiter (M101) redirects to. I don't believe there's really a standard of which article gets merged into which—of course the article's main title should be the more notable of the two. I believe as she is still in service as the Pułaski it should be that, though the Clark has hundreds of pageviews/month while this page only has a few, so there may be some disagreement there. I'll be happy to start the merge myself sometime soonish. - - mathmitch7 (talk/contribs) 12:29, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please do, if you have intended to do it anyway. JIP | Talk 12:43, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
@JIP: I've executed the merge, if you are interested in taking a look at the now-merged page and want to make any edits. - - mathmitch7 (talk/contribs) 19:37, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]