Talk:Nintendo
List of Presidents of Nintendo was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 13 August 2021 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Nintendo. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nintendo article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Nintendo" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Nintendo was one of the Video games good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
No controversies? Is this objectively realistic?
[edit]There have been several topics created requesting a controversies section, but none ever added. That makes me think this page deserves a WP:NPOV nomination for failing to do so, specifically failing WP:BALANCE?
These topics are related to discussing controversies in the past.
Talk:Nintendo/Archive 5
Talk:Nintendo/Archive 6#Controversies
https://kotaku.com/the-mess-that-came-after-nintendo-fired-an-employee-1771261927
https://www.polygon.com/24090415/nintendo-switch-controversies-debates
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-60405561
https://www.ign.com/articles/nintendo-america-contractors-full-time-complaints-report
https://nintendo.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Nintendo_controversies
Of all of the above they're probably not all equally significant, but it seems odd that there is absolutely no mention of anything of the sort. I don't hold a grudge against Nintendo (admittedly I also don't know the behind-the-scenes of the company all that well), but it seems for objectivity there MUST be such a section. I don't think there is any company of the size of Nintendo for which the Wikipedia page doesn't have a controversy and/or criticism section. Ybllaw (talk) 15:38, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- For the record, while the other sites are fine, wikis hosted on Fandom are not reliable sources. Harryhenry1 (talk) 07:59, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
The Wii U isn't the worst selling console in Nintendo's history
[edit]The Wii U isn't the worst selling video game console in Nintendo's history, it is actually the Virtual Boy, this is not mentioned at all on the page, neither is it mentioned even on the Virtual Boy's own Wikipedia page, instead, this Wikipedia page incorrectly says that "the Wii U is the least successful video game console in Nintendo's history". The Wii U sold 13.56 million units worldwide, while the Virtual Boy sold 770,000 units. Can someone please change this? 2A02:2F0A:B412:7300:80EB:BEF:5CEC:1C2F (talk) 18:11, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Environmental Record comes from activism and less from unbiased assessments
[edit]For one Greenpeace constantly ranks electronic companies low from their environmental assessments despite efforts made by those companies to reduce their impacts. Similarly the Enough Project used a lack of information as an attack and thus gave Nintendo a score of 0. These come from old sources that have not been renewed with later rankings nor a corrected record on Nintendo's response to these inquiries that are over a decade old.
This gives the appearance of pure activism attacks and not actual credible efforts to create a true environmental assessment nor stance from Nintendo. Setery10 (talk) 21:43, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 13 November 2024
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change percentage of Saudi Arabia stake in Nintendo, which is now at 6.3 percent. 188.65.191.61 (talk) 15:20, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Thank you! Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 16:47, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
"The Big N" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]The redirect The Big N has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 3 § The two "Big N" redirects until a consensus is reached. User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 05:15, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delisted good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- B-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- B-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- B-Class video game articles
- Top-importance video game articles
- B-Class Nintendo articles
- Nintendo task force articles
- WikiProject Video games articles
- B-Class organization articles
- High-importance organization articles
- WikiProject Organizations articles
- B-Class company articles
- High-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- B-Class Japan-related articles
- High-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles
- B-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- B-Class Washington articles
- Mid-importance Washington articles
- WikiProject Washington articles
- B-Class Seattle articles
- Mid-importance Seattle articles
- WikiProject Seattle articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- B-Class Baseball articles
- Mid-importance Baseball articles
- B-Class Seattle Mariners articles
- Unknown-importance Seattle Mariners articles
- Seattle Mariners articles
- WikiProject Baseball articles
- Wikipedia articles that use American English