Talk:Nikon D100

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Photography

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

First paragraph

The first paragraph makes no sense, a camera that costs 1,999 cannot have broken the 2k barrier!? 22:31, 29 December 2010 (GMT) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.147.83.40 (talk) Presumably it means that the Nikon D100 was the first camera to break the $2000 barrier downward (i.e. the first one to be that cheap). Nullinfinity667 (talk) 12:26, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation

Removed copyrighted material added by one-time contributor 66.27.186.184 from the article. Also, as I imagine the unformatted feature-list was the cause of the cleanup notice, I removed that notice as well. jareha 22:11, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

How to format references

The specifications list could do with references. I have added these to the top entry on the list - anyone have any better ideas to make clear the references provide information for the whole list? Nullinfinity667 (talk) 12:26, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]