Talk:New York State Route 359

New York State Route 359 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 20, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

U.S. Roads: State highways / New York Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	New York
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Change of Intersection Template

This article was changed to bring its intersection template to the NYint format. No other changes were made. It is important to verify, update and/or correct as necessary. Fwgoebel 15:59, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 359/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
Your WP:LEAD introduces new, unreferenced information: One of the shortest signed routes. Also: "It is the only instance in New York of a route designated without an alphabetic suffix that terminates at both ends at suffixed routes" is new / unreferenced.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Awaiting improvements. On hold. --Admrboltz (talk) 06:40, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Most removed, otherwise - it should be done...Mitch32^(UP) 19:25, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, now that we know that information exists, the article is not broad in coverage since you've removed it. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 21:09, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Readded, but not in lead and with refs.Mitch32^(UP) 18:22, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Passing --Admrboltz (talk) 19:23, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]