Jump to content

Talk:Ned Haig

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

This page was recently listed on Wikipedia:Third opinion with the message "Ned Haig page needs a 3rd opinion.". What do you want a third opinion on? There seems to be no discussion or controversy here. Please re-list it (or reply here) with more details. --Scott Wilson 16:17, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The edit history shows two editors accusing each other of copy/paste violations. Proscibe a course of WP:CIVIL, WP:COPY and WP:OWN and they should feel better in the morning.

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ned Haig. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:19, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]